Hmmm, You have the movements right. I have the Trigger as AC-1 and the side button as AC-2. The top two buttons besides the thumb stick I use for the throttle, and the ones below that I use for the landing gear and changing camera views. I would say give it a day and practice with it, youll be able to fly your planes a lot smoother (And mine too)
@CapitalTechnologies Ok, yours is 20mph faster. But the take off speed it lower. And the 133 still turns better. This is still a good air craft though.
@phoenixzis i dont judge by numbers, i judge by creation and dear, you cant say that mine arnt that detailed when yours arn't that sparkly either. If you hadn't noticed, Ill tell you what I do. I innovate. I couldnt give two shits about detail, they are my creations and I have pumped out so many different types that I often have to scroll down my list just to remember what i have mad. Yeah I know they are a bit plane, but I make up for that in the different kinda of ways I can make them. And at the scale I build, its a bit hard to put much detail into them.
After extensive testing, I have come to the conclusion that the Bf-133-B is a better aircraft for the job. It's faster, and more maneuverable. BUT- The B1 version of your fighter (after increasing the engine power and size of the prop) could turn as well as the Bf-133, and had a decent speed of 680mph, tot he Bf's 740mph.
@AgDynamics Im had tried to do that but I simply dont like it. I know my planes are simple and unnoticeable but I do research into them to see what would be the best way to make them at my scale.
@NovaTopaz The carrier is a revision of a older carrier, I had been thinking of using fuselages which I have for the newest flying carrier. This one I just used what I had to test out the fighter launch system.
This doesnt have 100 parts though
Ill try it.
@Acer500 I did that on purpose to make it look mooooreee organic?
@NSStancik
You can use mine, check out my list
You can use mine, check out my list
@Acer500 Try 50% while pulling up, and after gaining speed throttle up more.
@Acer500 Really? It doesnt do that for me.
@Acer500 this is just an escort version, the main carrier is in the works.
@Acer500 thank you
@Acer500 no problem
Hmmm, You have the movements right. I have the Trigger as AC-1 and the side button as AC-2. The top two buttons besides the thumb stick I use for the throttle, and the ones below that I use for the landing gear and changing camera views. I would say give it a day and practice with it, youll be able to fly your planes a lot smoother (And mine too)
@phoenixzis Me too. I will put in some more detail to my planes.
@Solarisaircraft The Graf-Zeppelin 5, with the Bf-133 fighters. And thank you.
@phoenixzis I am really sorry
@Solarisaircraft There are two in my list. Check them out.
Wow this is nice!
Mind if I use the missiles?
@CapitalTechnologies Ok, yours is 20mph faster. But the take off speed it lower. And the 133 still turns better. This is still a good air craft though.
Alright, Ill test it out.
Ive decided to start out on the ocean fleet.
@phoenixzis Your planes are fine.
@phoenixzis Im sorry, dealing with stress while typing.
@phoenixzis i dont judge by numbers, i judge by creation and dear, you cant say that mine arnt that detailed when yours arn't that sparkly either. If you hadn't noticed, Ill tell you what I do. I innovate. I couldnt give two shits about detail, they are my creations and I have pumped out so many different types that I often have to scroll down my list just to remember what i have mad. Yeah I know they are a bit plane, but I make up for that in the different kinda of ways I can make them. And at the scale I build, its a bit hard to put much detail into them.
@phoenixzis gee thanks for the speech...
@NovaTopaz There you go.
@Snipe121314 Thanks.
@NovaTopaz I like to pace myself abit when it comes to huge projects.
Wow decent design. It does need some work though.
Yep, it would be good for my carriers.
@DeezDucks They are military aircraft though, what will i paint them? Bright pink?
After extensive testing, I have come to the conclusion that the Bf-133-B is a better aircraft for the job. It's faster, and more maneuverable. BUT- The B1 version of your fighter (after increasing the engine power and size of the prop) could turn as well as the Bf-133, and had a decent speed of 680mph, tot he Bf's 740mph.
@ronyseptian17 I do sometimes, I just rather not since adding bits onto the plane creates drag.
@CapitalTechnologies Very well, the test start now.
@CapitalTechnologies Ohhh neat
@CapitalTechnologies This is the plane you are competing with.
@CapitalTechnologies I will have to do some research to see if this is better than the Bf-133-C that I was planning for the carrier.
This is actually to scale of my aircraft, very cool!
@CapitalTechnologies Alright, she will be on the new Uber Graf Zeppelin 9.
@CapitalTechnologies Thats fine, ill see what I can do with them in the afternoon.
@AgDynamics Im had tried to do that but I simply dont like it. I know my planes are simple and unnoticeable but I do research into them to see what would be the best way to make them at my scale.
THanks everyone.
@CapitalTechnologies Sure, The fighters there are about the fastest one prop I got thoguh.
@AgDynamics Not like you have to worry about it, your so good at this while Im complete shite.
@AgDynamics I just want to know if my planes are any good.
@NovaTopaz Also, I like to keep my planes to scale of the cockpit, that's why they are all simple yet have the same scale.
@NovaTopaz The carrier is a revision of a older carrier, I had been thinking of using fuselages which I have for the newest flying carrier. This one I just used what I had to test out the fighter launch system.
@NovaTopaz Im talking about the big projects, like the carriers. And Most of my fights are simple yet complicated.
I identify as a Bf-109, thank you very much >:(
Im willing to help, but next time you should credit the designer.