Interesting modification.
The engine gives me concerns, seeing as the 110A's "Trirad" was intended to be easy to produce and cheap. Are parts available in large numbers for such an old engine?
I'll have to take a closer look at some of the other changes later.
This could, possibly, come in handy. If I'm remembering company history right, back in the 1960s Graingy developed a piston-powered attack aircraft. I don't believe it saw too long of a production run, if really a run at all, but I think the required tooling still exists and I wouldn't be entirely surprised if the Eel Protectorate managed to get production going again. I don't think the base 110A would really be able to catch them, meaning we'd be reliant on more expensive aircraft types to ward them off.
@Guywhobuildsstuff Also known as making an entirely new aircraft.
The whole point of the aircraft is cost. We have to be sure not to drive it up too greatly. At that point we might as well just produce a higher class of aircraft i.e. a jet.
@Guywhobuildsstuff If we're facing fourth gens we're screwed anyways.
The Eel Protectorate operates glorified lawn mowers as far as I know, so I think we're in the clear.
Note how I said Russian and not Soviet.
While I understand that Soviet equipment was generally inferior for its time period, many of these systems, such as the T-72, were far newer at the time and were built by a country with an actual military budget (and not just Corruptovich's yacht fund). Had the USSR not collapsed I'm sure they would've eventually devised something far scarier to better match NATO equipment (and learned from the Gulf War curbstomp), instead of the constant upgrade packages or paper tigers Russia makes.
Anyways, on the topic of the forum:
I have little specialized knowledge in regards to modern tanks. That being said, I have generally little faith in Russian Federation equipment and have heard less than flattering things about the T-90's performance.
@Guywhobuildsstuff as seen here.
Comparing it to an older Graingy aircraft, such as a GP-43, shows admittedly worse performance in some aspects than the WWII fighter. Most noticeably, speed.
Regardless, I consider this design successful.
@AurouraPlanes Neither. I have bigger things to worry about than a bunch of overpaid hosers sliding around on ice chucking rubber bullets at each other.
I think there are combinations for AGs, but I cannot remember how they work.
As for full-on sequences, I have no idea if that's even possible. At least, as far as REQUIRING the sequence.
Also, while not strictly its purpose, the ADP-110does have a payload hardpoint on its belly which does permit some CAS use.
Unfortunately it's also a fair bit more expensive that... this.
Yes, this is a reasonable request.
@Graingy 7.62 for the prototype.
Production model has .50s. I'm not stupid.
Interesting modification.
The engine gives me concerns, seeing as the 110A's "Trirad" was intended to be easy to produce and cheap. Are parts available in large numbers for such an old engine?
I'll have to take a closer look at some of the other changes later.
This could, possibly, come in handy. If I'm remembering company history right, back in the 1960s Graingy developed a piston-powered attack aircraft. I don't believe it saw too long of a production run, if really a run at all, but I think the required tooling still exists and I wouldn't be entirely surprised if the Eel Protectorate managed to get production going again. I don't think the base 110A would really be able to catch them, meaning we'd be reliant on more expensive aircraft types to ward them off.
I am not an Albertan.
@DatFiat126Fan19 This is a digital file you nincompoop.
@TheMouse Hit Grain.
@Jaspy190 That's a good opinion.
To bring down evil.
@Rb2h I-
...
I can actually see that.
@DatFiat126Fan19 Peculiar.
And please put those back.
Ah, my bad. I couldn't make it out with my screen lighting. It's rather dark.
@Guywhobuildsstuff Also known as making an entirely new aircraft.
The whole point of the aircraft is cost. We have to be sure not to drive it up too greatly. At that point we might as well just produce a higher class of aircraft i.e. a jet.
@Guywhobuildsstuff If we're facing fourth gens we're screwed anyways.
The Eel Protectorate operates glorified lawn mowers as far as I know, so I think we're in the clear.
Note how I said Russian and not Soviet.
While I understand that Soviet equipment was generally inferior for its time period, many of these systems, such as the T-72, were far newer at the time and were built by a country with an actual military budget (and not just Corruptovich's yacht fund). Had the USSR not collapsed I'm sure they would've eventually devised something far scarier to better match NATO equipment (and learned from the Gulf War curbstomp), instead of the constant upgrade packages or paper tigers Russia makes.
Anyways, on the topic of the forum:
I have little specialized knowledge in regards to modern tanks. That being said, I have generally little faith in Russian Federation equipment and have heard less than flattering things about the T-90's performance.
@TheMouse Ah, I see.
hm
Ah
Junior high... what's that, 6-8?
Is that another term for middle school? I cannot remember.
Ha
To be honest, I kind of agree.
Hm, congrats.
Now you have to figure out where you're going next.
Fun.
What have I missed?
I do not believe the Eel Protectorate operates any GP-43s, so at least there's that.
@Guywhobuildsstuff as seen here.
Comparing it to an older Graingy aircraft, such as a GP-43, shows admittedly worse performance in some aspects than the WWII fighter. Most noticeably, speed.
Regardless, I consider this design successful.
@Graingy Yeah pretty much.
That place is a void.
@AurouraPlanes Neither. I have bigger things to worry about than a bunch of overpaid hosers sliding around on ice chucking rubber bullets at each other.
I'd rather die than support Alberta
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 *Their (?)
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Yes, do not.
"My mini"
Your what?
D:)
That's a fine looking biplane
Something Moses something Locusts
your what?
I will not
@TheUltimatePlaneLover no.
Somehow I get the feeling that is a very bad idea.
Be sad.
@TheMouse Of course it is.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Good.
Say that again but slower for the layman.
Holy hell
Trippy looking
This truly is the most serious of conflicts.
Sigh.
I think there are combinations for AGs, but I cannot remember how they work.
As for full-on sequences, I have no idea if that's even possible. At least, as far as REQUIRING the sequence.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover no
Also, while not strictly its purpose, the ADP-110 does have a payload hardpoint on its belly which does permit some CAS use.
Unfortunately it's also a fair bit more expensive that... this.
Ahem!
"313,062 Kenyan Shillings = 3294.98 CAD" We have GOT to talk about your supplier man. That thing's made outta cardboard and scotch tape.
@HuskyDynamics01 Well, at least you now have an Alt.
@ComradeSandman No, I don't.