@32 Yes, but going through the list is daunting considering that many shaders only look good with extremely specific settings.
Multiplying the number of combinations total would likely require scientific notation to display.
How do you suggesting picking out shaders? There are countless of them, many seemingly redundant/overlapping in purpose, and with incredible numbers of combinations of settings. Even getting a single one to work can be virtually impossible, let alone multiple in conjunction.
Or this a problem literally only I have?
@crazyplaness Yeah, saw so.
Still, enough is different to make the process very unpleasant and uncertain. Also, it seemed some filters just didn't download?
@crazyplaness Tech tutorials are some of the most annoying things in existence.
They either don't match what you see, or they just don't work.
That is, IF you can even find one.
@Guywhobuildsstuff You wouldn't have happened to have caught who took this photo, would you?
We picked it off the airwaves, but its sender and destination are unclear.
It could perhaps benefit from moving the leading edge of the main wing forward to increase forward and overall lift.
Also, something to make the Trim control show up without needing a keyboard.
Conversion for naval use seems unlikely.
Painfully loud. Looks good, though hard to lift off and tends to veer on the runway. Nose-heavy.
Could have potential regardless.
Perhaps worth looking into conversion for seaborne operation?
Unfortunately due to technical issues with verification I am stuck with this horrible, horrible auto-generated thumbnail. Just a few seconds earlier it'd be fine but noooo that'd be too convenient. Instead I get this garbage.
@Guywhobuildsstuff I'll give it a look later.
Working on something at the moment.
Also, I believe it was determined that old usernames don't work in tags. If you want Grain to see this then you'll have to tag the Graingy account by its current name.
@TheCommentaryGuy @VeroViper I counted the first five pages of the highest ranking users.
While I may have overlooked some, my eyesight isn't infallible and some categorize things differently, I believe I counted around 22 users whose profile pictures I'd classify as "anime".
That is a minority without doubt.
@VeroViper No, you're the one getting riled up here.
I am in no way trying to be combative or argumentative here. I have done no deep research or tallying on this, but am not clinging to an argument. I do not care what the statistics are for profile pictures (so long as they're, y'know, tasteful).
I am not trying to incite "drama". You have greatly misinterpreted my words and gotten incredibly defensive over absolutely jack. Personally I do not notice many anime profile pictures. Maybe that's just me!
What I'm saying is that perhaps you tend to notice those profiles pictures more, similarly to how I don't.
You ever seen that picture of the bomber? This one?
That's not the exact kind of bias I'm getting at, but it's the sense of the word. It is not an attack on your "moral fiber" or what have you, it's a simple suggestion that maybe, just maybe, it's possible that you have made the unconscious mistake of only noticing some things while forgetting others.
You know, something humans, flawed and stupid apes, tend to do?
Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe I have the bias here. Maybe I've totally failed to pay attention to the users around me.
But do not accuse me of trying to start a "drama sh_tshow" because you can't accept a polite suggestion of a natural human slip-up.
@32 I’ve gotten nothing.
@Graingy oh, shut it.
@Guywhobuildsstuff That’s not great.
I checked their account and found nothing, unfortunately. Is it an older post?
@32 Yes, but going through the list is daunting considering that many shaders only look good with extremely specific settings.
Multiplying the number of combinations total would likely require scientific notation to display.
@Guywhobuildsstuff You're still feeding him, right?
@Graingy It's a coastal steamer. How would it do in a gale?
@Guywhobuildsstuff It's the dog, isn't it?
How do you suggesting picking out shaders? There are countless of them, many seemingly redundant/overlapping in purpose, and with incredible numbers of combinations of settings. Even getting a single one to work can be virtually impossible, let alone multiple in conjunction.
Or this a problem literally only I have?
@32 I'll have to give that a read. Thanks.
ANY.
@Graingy And its maintenance during that?
I am not getting in that thing.
+1@crazyplaness Perhaps. I cannot remember what was available.
@Guywhobuildsstuff A rouge unit? Or have you been performing recon without informing me?
@Graingy And how old is the Morrayge, again?
Despite that, I am now going to do something you could never do: Go eat ice cream.
I will admit, I'm a little impressed by the landing.
@crazyplaness Yeah, saw so.
Still, enough is different to make the process very unpleasant and uncertain. Also, it seemed some filters just didn't download?
@Graingy Copycat.
@Graingy Ask whoever took the picture.
@crazyplaness lol
@crazyplaness Tech tutorials are some of the most annoying things in existence.
They either don't match what you see, or they just don't work.
That is, IF you can even find one.
Okay, I figure that's enough.
The Reshade tutorial needs replacing, it is horrifically outdated.
The new problem, ignoring the previous issues, Step 8 looks completely different, lacking every and all options that the tutorial shows.
Yippee.
Step 7 and I already have found a significant block. The required tab does not exist.
And nobody checks this.
Dangit.
Sunfish seen in motion here.
New teaser for the Sunfish
@Guywhobuildsstuff You wouldn't have happened to have caught who took this photo, would you?
We picked it off the airwaves, but its sender and destination are unclear.
A rare case where we agree.
+1The notification can be turned off, at least in Windows 11, fortunately. I recently did.
@Kerbango INDEED WE DID!
+1@Guywhobuildsstuff What?
It could perhaps benefit from moving the leading edge of the main wing forward to increase forward and overall lift.
Also, something to make the Trim control show up without needing a keyboard.
Conversion for naval use seems unlikely.
Painfully loud. Looks good, though hard to lift off and tends to veer on the runway. Nose-heavy.
Could have potential regardless.
Perhaps worth looking into conversion for seaborne operation?
Unfortunately due to technical issues with verification I am stuck with this horrible, horrible auto-generated thumbnail. Just a few seconds earlier it'd be fine but noooo that'd be too convenient. Instead I get this garbage.
@Guywhobuildsstuff Good News: It's moving.
@Guywhobuildsstuff I'll give it a look later.
Working on something at the moment.
Also, I believe it was determined that old usernames don't work in tags. If you want Grain to see this then you'll have to tag the Graingy account by its current name.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 No thank you.
Looks like a snow man
@Guywhobuildsstuff
@VeroViper Apology accepted, I guess.
Real.
@Graingy You must be happy with yourself.
Not the rock below me.
+1What the heck
What does this mean?
@TheCommentaryGuy @VeroViper I counted the first five pages of the highest ranking users.
While I may have overlooked some, my eyesight isn't infallible and some categorize things differently, I believe I counted around 22 users whose profile pictures I'd classify as "anime".
That is a minority without doubt.
@VeroViper No, you're the one getting riled up here.
I am in no way trying to be combative or argumentative here. I have done no deep research or tallying on this, but am not clinging to an argument. I do not care what the statistics are for profile pictures (so long as they're, y'know, tasteful).
I am not trying to incite "drama". You have greatly misinterpreted my words and gotten incredibly defensive over absolutely jack.
Personally I do not notice many anime profile pictures. Maybe that's just me!
What I'm saying is that perhaps you tend to notice those profiles pictures more, similarly to how I don't.
You ever seen that picture of the bomber? This one?
That's not the exact kind of bias I'm getting at, but it's the sense of the word. It is not an attack on your "moral fiber" or what have you, it's a simple suggestion that maybe, just maybe, it's possible that you have made the unconscious mistake of only noticing some things while forgetting others.
You know, something humans, flawed and stupid apes, tend to do?
Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe I have the bias here. Maybe I've totally failed to pay attention to the users around me.
But do not accuse me of trying to start a "drama sh_tshow" because you can't accept a polite suggestion of a natural human slip-up.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 I'll pass.
That sounds hazardous.
You sound like Cave Johnson.