@RedHawk @TehDuck as far as I know, salvador isn't breaking any rules. He mostly has a lot of points for two reasons. First of all he, builds a lot of planes. Several every day. Secondly, he is highly active in the community, particularly with the low-ranked users, which encourages other people to check him out/upvote stuff in return. I'm not here to judge whether anyone deserves their points or not, just to see if the rules are being held to, and in this case, it seems that they are.
@Flightsonic it's alright, no need to apologise. They don't actually have to use the tags, those are just for the benefit of the YouTubers and their fans
Normally a mixture of decelerons and wing drag keep flying wings stable. However, the former is really difficult in SP and the latter isn't in the game at all. The best thing to do is usually to conceal a vertical stabiliser or two somewhere
@DirtDart real time nudge mirroring would be wonderful, the amount of times I need to manually xml edit part connections when I've nudged something in to a difficult place is painful
@poo1loo does almost nothing but upvote your planes, has just enough points to upvote stuff (all provided by you), and has the same IP as you. This looks a lot like an alt account being used to vote yourself up. Have you got an explanation?
Hi DirtDart, sorry for those two. Yes, this can be done. I see you're on windows, so you can just do it the easy way. Put on prop on the front of the fuselage, and nudge it backwards until it's entirely inside the fuselage. You should now be able to put a second one in front of that. Adjust the spacing, set one of them to have reversed rotation, and you're good to go.
@Halfstrike put a backtick ( ` ) in the line above and below the code to put the whole thing in to a monospaced format with nothing like italics included
@FastestJetYet hi there. Welcome to SimplePlanes! It seems you reported your own comment, I assume that was an accident. If you need a hand with anything, feel free to ask
No profanity on the site please, a lot of users here are quite young. I've removed it from the title, but you can rename it to something else if you like, so long as it's within the rules
Hi PRgamer32. I need to ask you to change the name of your plane, as naming planes for YouTubers is against the rules of the site. To mark a plane for the attention of a YouTuber, use the tag system instead. There is a dedicated Kwebbelkop tag.
Hi Marc9954. I need to ask you to change the name of your plane, as naming planes for YouTubers is against the rules of the site. To mark a plane for the attention of a YouTuber, use the tag system instead. There is a dedicated Jelly tag.
@Sutairs nah, of course not. You apologised and acted fine after I asked you about it, which puts you way ahead of a lot of the people I have to deal with
Reuploading exact copies of planes is against the rules. You must make substantial edits to a plane in order to upload it again. Naming planes for YouTubers is also prohibited. Use the tag system instead.
I've unfeatured this because large amounts of it have been taken from AgDynamics' Chinook with no credit, and the successor system has not been used. I don't want to remove the plane altogether, because it's a great build even allowing for the parts from the Chinook, but please add credit to the original in the description
As mentioned by bjac0, profanity is against the rules of the site. Your plane can go back up if you change the name and then reply to me so I can check
Two things: first of all, if you just want to say you hate someone, don't upload the plane. There's no need for it. Secondly, all you have done here is taken the hard work of another user in order to try to annoy Jelly and his fans. I'm going to remove this plane; please try to have some respect for other users of the site.
@Sniper16 even if China was a completely awful place, I'm sure that any Chinese players on this site would find your comments quite hurtful. Try to have a little respect.
It's a test of the next version of the game. The devs let people try it on the understanding that it isn't finished, and in return people give feedback on what works and what doesn't, especially bugs. It's not that the devs hate the app store, it's that Apple is very restrictive in what it allows on the app store. Public betas aren't an option on Apple devices.
@RedHawk @TehDuck as far as I know, salvador isn't breaking any rules. He mostly has a lot of points for two reasons. First of all he, builds a lot of planes. Several every day. Secondly, he is highly active in the community, particularly with the low-ranked users, which encourages other people to check him out/upvote stuff in return. I'm not here to judge whether anyone deserves their points or not, just to see if the rules are being held to, and in this case, it seems that they are.
@BaconAircrafts why not? @Frant24's suggestion is the only way to do it
@SimpleName11 there's already a 300 part upper limit for the PC version, so I imagine something similar will be implemented
@Flightsonic it's alright, no need to apologise. They don't actually have to use the tags, those are just for the benefit of the YouTubers and their fans
@Flightsonic there's nothing actually wrong with this one. Painting it green isn't an issue, and descriptions are fair game.
@Alltimelow I'm fine, I hugely prefer playing on PC, and my phone does everything else I want it to. Thanks, though
@tacotime mine :(
@MarcosStarFighters yes?
Normally a mixture of decelerons and wing drag keep flying wings stable. However, the former is really difficult in SP and the latter isn't in the game at all. The best thing to do is usually to conceal a vertical stabiliser or two somewhere
@ShatterFox I can, but I want to make sure that I should be first. Everyone deserves a chance to defend themselves
Please do not reupload stock planes. You have been told this before when you uploaded the Vertigo. You will get a ban if you continue to do so.
@DirtDart real time nudge mirroring would be wonderful, the amount of times I need to manually xml edit part connections when I've nudged something in to a difficult place is painful
Please do not reupload the work of others. Uploading an edited version with substantial changes is fine, but exact copies aren't.
@poo1loo does almost nothing but upvote your planes, has just enough points to upvote stuff (all provided by you), and has the same IP as you. This looks a lot like an alt account being used to vote yourself up. Have you got an explanation?
@bjac0 I'll pretend I didn't see that
Ah, it seems that having paragraph breaks (two line breaks in succession in Markdown) breaks the backtick formatting
@Halfstrike it was along the lines of "ugly as * but it works"
Hi DirtDart, sorry for those two. Yes, this can be done. I see you're on windows, so you can just do it the easy way. Put on prop on the front of the fuselage, and nudge it backwards until it's entirely inside the fuselage. You should now be able to put a second one in front of that. Adjust the spacing, set one of them to have reversed rotation, and you're good to go.
@Halfstrike put a backtick ( ` ) in the line above and below the code to put the whole thing in to a monospaced format with nothing like italics included
Not pictured: Bombardier, Comac, Embraer, Ilyushin, Sukhoi, and Tupolev all feeling sad and left out
@goboygo1 it's the CoM it needs to be level with. The CoT should normally be pretty close to this too, though.
What's this abuse of the voting system?
@FastestJetYet hi there. Welcome to SimplePlanes! It seems you reported your own comment, I assume that was an accident. If you need a hand with anything, feel free to ask
@sumitshakya don't abuse the report system. FuRiOuSpLaNeS is right.
@EnderWiggin @FrankieB guys, there's not even a discussion here. Just stop, please, both of you.
@CALVIN232 no profanity on the site please. I've removed it for you.
No profanity on the site please, a lot of users here are quite young. I've removed it from the title, but you can rename it to something else if you like, so long as it's within the rules
Hi PRgamer32. I need to ask you to change the name of your plane, as naming planes for YouTubers is against the rules of the site. To mark a plane for the attention of a YouTuber, use the tag system instead. There is a dedicated Kwebbelkop tag.
Hi Marc9954. I need to ask you to change the name of your plane, as naming planes for YouTubers is against the rules of the site. To mark a plane for the attention of a YouTuber, use the tag system instead. There is a dedicated Jelly tag.
Please don't repost your creations, this is considered spam. I have removed this copy.
Please don't repost copies of your planes
Judging from the other comments here, I assume this originally had Jelly in the title. If it did and you changed it, thank you
@Sutairs nah, of course not. You apologised and acted fine after I asked you about it, which puts you way ahead of a lot of the people I have to deal with
@FrogmasterAereonautics I know, but if we feature everything good, nothing will stay featured long enough to be worthwhile
Reuploading exact copies of planes is against the rules. You must make substantial edits to a plane in order to upload it again. Naming planes for YouTubers is also prohibited. Use the tag system instead.
I've unfeatured this because large amounts of it have been taken from AgDynamics' Chinook with no credit, and the successor system has not been used. I don't want to remove the plane altogether, because it's a great build even allowing for the parts from the Chinook, but please add credit to the original in the description
As mentioned by bjac0, profanity is against the rules of the site. Your plane can go back up if you change the name and then reply to me so I can check
Two things: first of all, if you just want to say you hate someone, don't upload the plane. There's no need for it. Secondly, all you have done here is taken the hard work of another user in order to try to annoy Jelly and his fans. I'm going to remove this plane; please try to have some respect for other users of the site.
@Sutairs alright, no worries dude
Right click the image and select "copy image URL", then use that link
@Sniper16 even if China was a completely awful place, I'm sure that any Chinese players on this site would find your comments quite hurtful. Try to have a little respect.
Profanity is against the rules of the site. Reply to me when you've changed the name, and I'll make the plane available again.
You forgot all of the formatting. You need to use:
For the second one. That does this:
The other two aren't images, they're .svgs
@TheMasterSoldier come on, you're just willfully stirring things up with that comment. Please remove it.
It's a test of the next version of the game. The devs let people try it on the understanding that it isn't finished, and in return people give feedback on what works and what doesn't, especially bugs. It's not that the devs hate the app store, it's that Apple is very restrictive in what it allows on the app store. Public betas aren't an option on Apple devices.
@Thefalloutplayr well that's pretty valid thinking
@Thefalloutplayr yeah man, it's pretty good. I don't understand the 800lb dead weight in the nose, though
@808REKT you still took another user's work without their permission. Please don't do that again.
@AviownCorp well yes, but that was mostly my fault hahaha
Excellent performance! I changed up the armament for more of a strike role and took out the beta naval fleet