Design: 9/10
Top speed: 4/10
Turn rate: 4/15(turns fine, but sluggish)
Climb rate: 7/15
Final rating: 13/15
So close! Keep up the good work- you do get one more submission, after all!
Hold it. I put in structural wings, which can't have control surfaces, yet it's one wing which does have it. Sorry, i have to disqualify- you replaced the structural wings with primary wings.
Design: 10/10
Top speed: 4/10
Turn rate: 3/15(turns fine, but very sluggish)
Climb rate: 10/15
Final rating: 9/15
Aerodynamically sound, but needs improvement.
@AeroTactical you did not say ANYTHING that it had to be realistic! Even then, this is (loosely) based on the Bv-141! Even if it's disqualified, can you still rate it?
Design: 8/10
Speed: 5/10
Turn rate: 11/15
Climb rate: 13/15
Final rating: 12/15
Excellent! Also, i see what you wrote on the fuselage. I'm not a dog (-_-"), but it's very clever!
Imagine you're just flying something around, and then you see this flying at you- i just realized how scary this could be after an AI spawned in one and it ended up right behind me and ended my life in seconds-
@ThatrandomguywholikesSP Alright, i'll take your word for it. No longer disqualified.
@Liensis If you want an example of asymmetry, check my build. It doesn't count for points, but it's helpful.
@AeroTactical Okay, i figured it out. Sorry again.
Design: 9/10
Top speed: 4/10
Turn rate: 4/15(turns fine, but sluggish)
Climb rate: 7/15
Final rating: 13/15
So close! Keep up the good work- you do get one more submission, after all!
I apologize. I'm not sure how, and i didn't know i had to ask.
Hold it. I put in structural wings, which can't have control surfaces, yet it's one wing which does have it. Sorry, i have to disqualify- you replaced the structural wings with primary wings.
Design: 10/10
Top speed: 4/10
Turn rate: 3/15(turns fine, but very sluggish)
Climb rate: 10/15
Final rating: 9/15
Aerodynamically sound, but needs improvement.
@Supersoli8 Well, dammit.
@Liensis The sides are not the same. Look up the Bv-141, that's a great example of this.
@Liensis I'd honestly like to see you make an asymmetric submission. I'll rate that one, too, and we'll take the highest number, eh?
I'm uprating this to 9/15- it can fly on one engine, although not well.
Design: 10/10
Turn rate: 4/10
Top speed: 6/15
Climb rate: 10/15
Final rating: 8/15
It's alright, but could use some improvement.
@AeroTactical you did not say ANYTHING that it had to be realistic! Even then, this is (loosely) based on the Bv-141! Even if it's disqualified, can you still rate it?
Also, it's based on the Bv-141.
You did not say that in the post!... Even if it's disqualified, can you rate it?
I'm going to raise this to 13/15. I set the engines to different groups with ZeroonDeactivate active, and it flies very well on one engine.
Design: 8/10
Speed: 5/10
Turn rate: 11/15
Climb rate: 13/15
Final rating: 12/15
Excellent! Also, i see what you wrote on the fuselage. I'm not a dog (-_-"), but it's very clever!
Imagine you're just flying something around, and then you see this flying at you- i just realized how scary this could be after an AI spawned in one and it ended up right behind me and ended my life in seconds-
If it keep getting thrown to the left, try pitching up hard. This keeps the tailwheel on the ground and helps to guide the aircraft.
Ah, ok.
@AeroTactical Alright. Next time, then! Let me know next time you make a challenge, eh?
@jamesPLANESii Okay, added 1000 pounds of dead weight to the front. Fixed pitching up, but still loses control on nosing down.
Also, bonus points if it's based on a real plane! Up to 5 points awarded for it being historical, depending on how obscure it is.
@AeroTactical fair, can i repost this but retrofitted with bombs? Or is it all the way out of the competition?
@jamesPLANESii Thanks for the upvote!
@jamesPLANESii Thanks! I'll try that, and let you know if it works!
@AeroTactical You just need to roll right when it veers to the left. Believe me, this very much can take off.
I also left a bit of space for airbrakes, if you want them, but you'll need to remove some missiles.
This... just. Why? (This is a joke)
+1Oh, wait...
You should make a P.108 Serie. 2! You know, italian 'bomber' that had a 102mm cannon?
If possible, try to fix it without gyroscope, but if it's needed that's fine. I'd really like to see this concept work!
By 'original' i mean the Asymmetric and armed Plane before this one- i know this plane's not mine originally, just an improvement.