@KnightOfRen
Oh, now I know what you mean. People really need to learn when to not criticize a build in a way that is hurtful. I learned the hard way as I made a bad comment on the German Corsair, and now I’ve been banned from its comment section.
Wow, you have come a really long way since your first build., they are so much better now. BTW, are you considering redoing the Rafale and P-40 to your new standards?
@Paragon
This build isn’t that bad okay, what the builder doesn’t need is hate comments saying their build is bad, but rather constructive criticism as to how to improve their build.
I think the biggest thing I noticed at first was how the canopy wasn’t back far enough, along with the wings not quite being shaped right, but this is still a fairly good plane.
I think he is gone, this is a real shame as he’d given me support in the past. I also had the opportunity for to almost enter in one of his challenges, though I uploaded my plane a few hours late.
@FoxtrotTheSergal
@FlipposMC
My criticism hasn’t been considered hate, even though I have critiqued on KnightOfRen’s more recent posts. Also, upvotes are simply a measure of how many people like the plane, not its quality. If it has a bunch of upvotes, then there’s nothing you can do about it, but don’t take shots at the builder.
@KnightOfRen
Oh I see, I do feel a little bad though for calling out flaws on your replicas, seeing that I don’t do replicas in the first place, all I want is for you to become better.
For the record, I’m not trying to be mean, I’m just offering some criticisms to the plane that keep it from being a better replica, not that it’s a bad plane. Anyway, the wings are too far forward and don’t look quite right and it is only supposed to have a single minigun on the left side of the airplane, not two machine guns. For the record though, this is a nice plane.
Not entirely sure why the AIM-120 AMRAAM is an air to ground missile for this build. After all, AMRAAM is an acronym for (Advanced.Medium.Range.Air to Air.Missle), not that it’s a big deal, just something I wanted to point out.
I feel the same, the time between each of my posts is going to be even longer thanks to school and the fact that I won’t be able to play as much. Sad, but it’s inevitable.
Very nice, I’m going to upvote this.
Just so you know, Hornet refers to my most recent VTOL fighter and Dragon is for my Marine Corps Ground Attack Aircraft.
@KnightOfRen
Oh, I thought it was because I made a bad comment, NVM
@KnightOfRen
Oh, now I know what you mean. People really need to learn when to not criticize a build in a way that is hurtful. I learned the hard way as I made a bad comment on the German Corsair, and now I’ve been banned from its comment section.
Uh, why is there a war in the comments section right now?
Wow, you have come a really long way since your first build., they are so much better now. BTW, are you considering redoing the Rafale and P-40 to your new standards?
I think the fuselage is what has the most parts as I wasn’t super part efficient with that.
@Northsoutheastthrop
Thanks, this plane took me like a month to build.
@Griffon1Crosswind
Thanks, the fuselage was extremely hard for me to do, and took up the vast majority of the build time.
@50CalChicken
Thanks, I really appreciate your upvote.
Well, the canards are a bit too big, and the inlet doesn’t fully blend in to the fuselage well, but other than that, nice plane.
@Paragon
+1Oh, I didn’t realize that, my apologies.
@Paragon
This build isn’t that bad okay, what the builder doesn’t need is hate comments saying their build is bad, but rather constructive criticism as to how to improve their build.
Here’s a spotlight for you, hopefully more people notice this plane.
+1I think the biggest thing I noticed at first was how the canopy wasn’t back far enough, along with the wings not quite being shaped right, but this is still a fairly good plane.
Woah, this plane is seriously underrated, amazing job, here’s a spotlight for you.
@Delightedman
Thanks, though my designs have obviously gotten better as I only created an account recently, despite having played this game for years.
@KnightOfRen
+1Sorry, bad joke. I meant props as in good job for using turbo-props.
Props to you for using turbo-props on this plane.
+1I think he is gone, this is a real shame as he’d given me support in the past. I also had the opportunity for to almost enter in one of his challenges, though I uploaded my plane a few hours late.
I’m pretty sure the B-52 cockpit doesn’t seat 4 people side by side, but rather two sitting side by side in the front and same in the back.
@KnightOfRen
Oops I thought I had simply put it in too late in the day for anyone to notice, so I reposted it.
Well, this certainly puts into perspective my lack of uploading. Maybe I should upgrade some of my planes and then repost them.
@FoxtrotTheSergal
@FlipposMC
My criticism hasn’t been considered hate, even though I have critiqued on KnightOfRen’s more recent posts. Also, upvotes are simply a measure of how many people like the plane, not its quality. If it has a bunch of upvotes, then there’s nothing you can do about it, but don’t take shots at the builder.
@Highground
I’m on IOS, I don’t know how to put pictures in forums or posts.
@LastManStanding
Thanks, building stealth planes is really hard, especially considering how it will be very different from the other ones I’ve made.
Also, it just reminds me how slow I am between my posts as you seem to post a lot of good planes pretty often.
Well, other than the fact that you forgot to put the gun on, I think this is a great build from you.
This plane deserves more upvotes, here’s a spotlight for you.
LOL, what even is this 😂
+2Nice Tomcat, one issue that I think should be mentioned though is that the flaps don’t work. It only causes the plane to roll.
@KnightOfRen
Oh I see, I do feel a little bad though for calling out flaws on your replicas, seeing that I don’t do replicas in the first place, all I want is for you to become better.
For the record, I’m not trying to be mean, I’m just offering some criticisms to the plane that keep it from being a better replica, not that it’s a bad plane. Anyway, the wings are too far forward and don’t look quite right and it is only supposed to have a single minigun on the left side of the airplane, not two machine guns. For the record though, this is a nice plane.
LOL, “Bush plane” was the one I found to be the funniest.
@KnightOfRen
I know, this plane confuses me.
@KnightOfRen
Huh, it says that on wiki and when I searched up images of the F-101 I could see a weapons bay in a few of them.
The F-101 voodoo had an internal weapons bay, not that I’m going to fault you for that seeing that weapons bays are hard to make.
LOL, I like this build even if it serves absolutely no purpose for me.
@XxVirginMary42069xX
I know, 😢
LOL, this is hilarious.
I’m not sure why I always get so annoyed when I see an “add a part and pass it on” post, but at least it’s being addressed.
@HeavyC22
Thanks
@FoxTrotOne
@Sm1ley_FaCe
@47parzival41
Thanks
Also, the way you placed the cockpit ended making it face backwards.
Not entirely sure why the AIM-120 AMRAAM is an air to ground missile for this build. After all, AMRAAM is an acronym for (Advanced.Medium.Range.Air to Air.Missle), not that it’s a big deal, just something I wanted to point out.
+1I feel the same, the time between each of my posts is going to be even longer thanks to school and the fact that I won’t be able to play as much. Sad, but it’s inevitable.
It’s really a shame that Theeunknown has left, he/she was really helpful in getting me to where I am today.
+3Sounds very interesting, I’ll consider entering.
I’m pretty sure the gun on all F-15 models is in the wing root, only the F/A-18 has the gun located in the nose.
Just so you know, and you don’t have to follow this btw, the gun for the F-15 is located in the right wing root, not the nose.