Ok this is good on looks, except for the gear, but the flight is garbage, I suggest working on that alot. It seems to be tail heavy, just need to work on that and it will be an amazing build.
20/25 - first impressions: looks good but not really impressive
30/50 - looks: not really, looks like it could be taken out on the water.
80/100 - flight: flight is good, pitch so heavy, roll is sluggish af, some pitch should be transferred to roll so it's a bit better. Power is right at 175 as is the drag so it's just barely complying.
15/25 - details: details are mediocre, could be better.
40/50 plausibility, it could be, just some refinements and other stuff would need to happen.
185/250 good job, I think this is better than the other one, please pin both so I can easily find it for finally judging.
10/25 - first impressions: not the prettiest thing in the world, not to impressed
10/50 - looks: looks more like a simplified ww2 fighter than it does an ultralight
30/100 - flight: roll is slow af, pitch is pretty bad but is better than the roll, the speed is good and honestly the best part of the flight, drag is WAY over what it should be, not impressive.
5/25 - details: details are basically non existent, barely any details, honestly not very good
20/50 plausibility, not really, maybe if it had more of a structure, and has a roll rate better than one roll in 20 minutes.
75/250 not to impressed with the quality, I think you could do better If you try a bit harder. ( pin this please so I can find it for final judging) Also if my math is wrong please tell me, I did it mentally.
Your score!!
25/25 - first impressions: looks amazing! I love the little touches like the glass over the lights
35/50 - looks: has the look of an ultralight, but it's not exactly what I'm looking for, like NotSoNormalPioneer said its really suppose to be more like flying sticks with wings, but still looks awesome
80/100 - flight: flight is good, but slow, an almostlight is supposed to be about 100mph faster than that. Other than that its perfect, pitch is perfect, has a slow roll rate but it's still good, floaty af, and is alot of fun to flop around with.
20/25 - details: details are perfect! The glass over the lights, the striping, and even some of the small little details make this an amazing aircraft to look at. I love how you modeled brakes on the gear. My only complaint is that all of the gold trim peices stick out quite a bit, it could have been worked into the body more.
45/50 plausibility, its definitely plausible, just that the speed is not really up to what I was looking for, but it still is a fun aircraft to fly.
Final score!
205/250 very well done on this, its solidly in first rn. It's an amazing aircraft to fly, just not exactly what I was looking for. It could definitely be a competitor to taikav areo industries. AWESOME JOB!!
This boi is fun to fly and use the burrttt
Uno momento porfavor. Me get plne.
Now make it an empty canvas, empty canvas, empty canvas.
Ok so can I join XPco? You know I have discord and all that.
Looks like a massive ammamo, box.
@tsampoy got it.
@tsampoy is that supposed to have any text?
@xboxseriesx its heading towards us, so it's at an angle.
Its really bad I know.
It might just be that, because it's still doing that.
I'm on my phone so It might affect it.
I think exceeding 60% throttle is a bad Idea, after it gets over that it gets weird.
@MetallumavisIndustries ok I'll try that.
And fast updoot in the east.
Doesn't look terrible, it could be worse. I kinda like it.
@MetallumavisIndustries I'm on high physics, what are you on?
Ok this is good on looks, except for the gear, but the flight is garbage, I suggest working on that alot. It seems to be tail heavy, just need to work on that and it will be an amazing build.
The wheels on the gear look a bit small.
Wow this looks great!
20/25 - first impressions: looks good but not really impressive
30/50 - looks: not really, looks like it could be taken out on the water.
80/100 - flight: flight is good, pitch so heavy, roll is sluggish af, some pitch should be transferred to roll so it's a bit better. Power is right at 175 as is the drag so it's just barely complying.
15/25 - details: details are mediocre, could be better.
40/50 plausibility, it could be, just some refinements and other stuff would need to happen.
185/250 good job, I think this is better than the other one, please pin both so I can easily find it for finally judging.
@NexusGaming sorry I was sleeping, and just got up, I'll get to it now.
@MrSilverWolf what happened sep 13? ( I don't remember that far back)
@UltimatePlayer123 lol, thanks!
@WiiMini welp I got political.
@Sheffie cool I've lived in the same state my whole life.
@TriStar you just had to respond to the text that I taged everyone to, wait you are in right?
@NexusGaming way better, looks like work was put in it.
I'll test it later, but it looks good, just a bit chonky.
@NexusGaming it's fine, as long as that's the only thing that you missed then you'll do good.
@rexzion what's the question mark about?
@SuperRoto I know I have, it's the small things that can make an almost good year.
@UltimatePlayer123 its power per engine that's restricted to 175hp. And I didn't know it had 331.
@Sarnnox thanks for the spot!
@Sarnnox alright cant wait for your entry!
@UltimatePlayer123 what do you mean?
Intresting
@xboxseriesx no https, just the www.simpleplanes.com and anything after that.
10/25 - first impressions: not the prettiest thing in the world, not to impressed
10/50 - looks: looks more like a simplified ww2 fighter than it does an ultralight
30/100 - flight: roll is slow af, pitch is pretty bad but is better than the roll, the speed is good and honestly the best part of the flight, drag is WAY over what it should be, not impressive.
5/25 - details: details are basically non existent, barely any details, honestly not very good
20/50 plausibility, not really, maybe if it had more of a structure, and has a roll rate better than one roll in 20 minutes.
75/250 not to impressed with the quality, I think you could do better If you try a bit harder. ( pin this please so I can find it for final judging) Also if my math is wrong please tell me, I did it mentally.
@xboxseriesx  and yes.
@xboxseriesx np
@xboxseriesx the part that you disabled colision on would be able to go up into a fuselage block, that's how you can make custom gear
Please pin the score so I can easily find it when it comes to the final judging for all entries.
Your score!!
25/25 - first impressions: looks amazing! I love the little touches like the glass over the lights
35/50 - looks: has the look of an ultralight, but it's not exactly what I'm looking for, like NotSoNormalPioneer said its really suppose to be more like flying sticks with wings, but still looks awesome
80/100 - flight: flight is good, but slow, an almostlight is supposed to be about 100mph faster than that. Other than that its perfect, pitch is perfect, has a slow roll rate but it's still good, floaty af, and is alot of fun to flop around with.
20/25 - details: details are perfect! The glass over the lights, the striping, and even some of the small little details make this an amazing aircraft to look at. I love how you modeled brakes on the gear. My only complaint is that all of the gold trim peices stick out quite a bit, it could have been worked into the body more.
45/50 plausibility, its definitely plausible, just that the speed is not really up to what I was looking for, but it still is a fun aircraft to fly.
Final score!
205/250 very well done on this, its solidly in first rn. It's an amazing aircraft to fly, just not exactly what I was looking for. It could definitely be a competitor to taikav areo industries. AWESOME JOB!!
@xboxseriesx in the xml menu, look at the names and one should be disablecolision, go to the input and it should say false, make it true, no caps.
I'd say Eugen
Ummmmmm........... t but I can't download.
@tsampoy hmm, I was expecting something more......burrttty.
@tsampoy you?
@tsampoy I'm being serious, I absolutely love the aircraft
@tsampoy North American t-6 Texan