10/25 - first impressions: not the prettiest thing in the world, not to impressed
10/50 - looks: looks more like a simplified ww2 fighter than it does an ultralight
30/100 - flight: roll is slow af, pitch is pretty bad but is better than the roll, the speed is good and honestly the best part of the flight, drag is WAY over what it should be, not impressive.
5/25 - details: details are basically non existent, barely any details, honestly not very good
20/50 plausibility, not really, maybe if it had more of a structure, and has a roll rate better than one roll in 20 minutes.
75/250 not to impressed with the quality, I think you could do better If you try a bit harder. ( pin this please so I can find it for final judging) Also if my math is wrong please tell me, I did it mentally.
Your score!!
25/25 - first impressions: looks amazing! I love the little touches like the glass over the lights
35/50 - looks: has the look of an ultralight, but it's not exactly what I'm looking for, like NotSoNormalPioneer said its really suppose to be more like flying sticks with wings, but still looks awesome
80/100 - flight: flight is good, but slow, an almostlight is supposed to be about 100mph faster than that. Other than that its perfect, pitch is perfect, has a slow roll rate but it's still good, floaty af, and is alot of fun to flop around with.
20/25 - details: details are perfect! The glass over the lights, the striping, and even some of the small little details make this an amazing aircraft to look at. I love how you modeled brakes on the gear. My only complaint is that all of the gold trim peices stick out quite a bit, it could have been worked into the body more.
45/50 plausibility, its definitely plausible, just that the speed is not really up to what I was looking for, but it still is a fun aircraft to fly.
Final score!
205/250 very well done on this, its solidly in first rn. It's an amazing aircraft to fly, just not exactly what I was looking for. It could definitely be a competitor to taikav areo industries. AWESOME JOB!!
@JeskoGoesVROOM the rotator is attached to a spring, but below the problem was fixed, but at high speeds it falls off, I'm going to keep it as its realistic. @Lixcuudis
@NexusGaming way better, looks like work was put in it.
I'll test it later, but it looks good, just a bit chonky.
@NexusGaming it's fine, as long as that's the only thing that you missed then you'll do good.
@rexzion what's the question mark about?
@KangaKangaTheRedNosedRoo no problem! Its always good to get others opinions!
+1@SuperRoto I know I have, it's the small things that can make an almost good year.
I have two tuxedo cats, there about 8 now, cute little things.
+1@rexzion @KangaKangaTheRedNosedRoo @wiimini thanks for participating!
+1@UltimatePlayer123 its power per engine that's restricted to 175hp. And I didn't know it had 331.
@Sarnnox thanks for the spot!
@Sarnnox alright cant wait for your entry!
@UltimatePlayer123 what do you mean?
@IndManufacturer nice, tag me please.
+1Is it going to be a b17 G? Guessing by the front nose in the blueprint.
+1Intresting
@xboxseriesx no https, just the www.simpleplanes.com and anything after that.
10/25 - first impressions: not the prettiest thing in the world, not to impressed
10/50 - looks: looks more like a simplified ww2 fighter than it does an ultralight
30/100 - flight: roll is slow af, pitch is pretty bad but is better than the roll, the speed is good and honestly the best part of the flight, drag is WAY over what it should be, not impressive.
5/25 - details: details are basically non existent, barely any details, honestly not very good
20/50 plausibility, not really, maybe if it had more of a structure, and has a roll rate better than one roll in 20 minutes.
75/250 not to impressed with the quality, I think you could do better If you try a bit harder. ( pin this please so I can find it for final judging) Also if my math is wrong please tell me, I did it mentally.
@xboxseriesx  and yes.
@xboxseriesx np
@xboxseriesx the part that you disabled colision on would be able to go up into a fuselage block, that's how you can make custom gear
Please pin the score so I can easily find it when it comes to the final judging for all entries.
Your score!!
25/25 - first impressions: looks amazing! I love the little touches like the glass over the lights
35/50 - looks: has the look of an ultralight, but it's not exactly what I'm looking for, like NotSoNormalPioneer said its really suppose to be more like flying sticks with wings, but still looks awesome
80/100 - flight: flight is good, but slow, an almostlight is supposed to be about 100mph faster than that. Other than that its perfect, pitch is perfect, has a slow roll rate but it's still good, floaty af, and is alot of fun to flop around with.
20/25 - details: details are perfect! The glass over the lights, the striping, and even some of the small little details make this an amazing aircraft to look at. I love how you modeled brakes on the gear. My only complaint is that all of the gold trim peices stick out quite a bit, it could have been worked into the body more.
45/50 plausibility, its definitely plausible, just that the speed is not really up to what I was looking for, but it still is a fun aircraft to fly.
Final score!
205/250 very well done on this, its solidly in first rn. It's an amazing aircraft to fly, just not exactly what I was looking for. It could definitely be a competitor to taikav areo industries. AWESOME JOB!!
@xboxseriesx in the xml menu, look at the names and one should be disablecolision, go to the input and it should say false, make it true, no caps.
Wow looks nice, I'll test later.
+1I'd say Eugen
Ummmmmm........... t but I can't download.
@tsampoy hmm, I was expecting something more......burrttty.
@tsampoy you?
@tsampoy I'm being serious, I absolutely love the aircraft
@tsampoy North American t-6 Texan
I'll test it, just know your going to loose alot of points for the drag points.
@tsampoy a plane.
@UltraLight ahhh
Plne.
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
@NexusGaming yep, as long as it meets the criteria.
That's an interesting concept, wonder what the practical use of this is, probably nothing.
@NexusGaming sorry man, its something that I think wouldn't really be an almostlight, but you could do it just not for the challenge.
Dont worry, I'm like 2 hours ahead of you soooooo......
Cool, I'm glad someone is good at screenshots.
@NexusGaming ummmmmm, not very ultralighty, I dont think I would allow it
Still got 11hours.........
@TheMegaMauster screw 4hours try 12hours.
+1@JeskoGoesVROOM the rotator is attached to a spring, but below the problem was fixed, but at high speeds it falls off, I'm going to keep it as its realistic. @Lixcuudis
@NotSoNormalPioneer well that fixed all my issues thanks!
@NotSoNormalPioneer ok that fixed the lean, thank you.
@NotSoNormalPioneer I'll try, I have drag disable pretty good, but I'll ssssssee
@NotSoNormalPioneer there it is
@NotSoNormalPioneer CoT is alllll the way in the back, CoM is pretty close to the front gear. I could put a screeny so you can see the aircraft.
May include me.
Hmmm, people in America are not happy with you.