As I am a stickler for realism, most planes during this era had s--- acceleration. Instead of the BEFs, we should use 2 and 4 times J-50s......however......the most realistic would be 10 and 5 times power J-30s. @MrVaultech
Tank's roofs are almost always less than 1.5"s thick. The Maus may have more armor up their than most tanks, but it will still be much thinner. If you placed a weapon high enough up-as to hit the roof at a very slight angle......it will most likely kill the tank. This is one of the problems with many modern western tanks, the turret riffs are big-and thin. @MrVaultech
The Maus has three main weaknesses-
*Roof Armor-That turret roof is big and thin.
*Coxail Weapon-A 75mm gun-really-it is worthless against attacking infantry. However, with how slow that turret moves you are screwed either way.
*Size and weight-Enemy infantry can hide, or attack from angles were they cannot be shot from. Well, unless the crew exposes themselves. This means, if any enemy troops get close-let's say 7'-they can just chill out behind the turret [another reason the 75mm was a bad idea].
However, these would only come into effect, after they made it to the battle feild. From what I remember, they weigh up to 200,000lbs, which isn't a great idea-especially if they get-stuck. They would have to get stuck in the mud, fall through bridges-basements, get stuck in ditches and stuff like that. They then need to be moved, and, good luck finding something able to move one of them. Them may also suffer from engine issues, but weight alone, would keep them from going anywhere.
Still,, we would recommend not having to ditch one every time you fly for two hours. We would advocate landing gear. It is easier to reload one of these with the same, perfectly reusable plane, than replaacing an fighter every few days. @DestinyAviation
We used thermite and napalm mixtures. We will never allow the use of that devilish goo. Besides it has be at least 100 years, and, despite the fact that the weapons we used can melt steel. We are watching a cool, and normal Africa. @dzulfikar
No, we bombed North Africa as well. The Colonists are doing just fine up their. Thermite is completely temporary, well temperature wise. Not damage wise. @dzulfikar
It seem like a waste to just bash it into the ground. Few well of counties wouldve invested in a plane like this. Unless, it also had landing gear. @DestinyAviation
Awnser, ceramics-however it isn't a toxin ... more a highly unstable, flammable, compound. You are best off using thermite and napalm mixtures-what destroyed Africa the last time. @dzulfikar
Yeah @WalrusAircraft
Needs to be around 300 or less. Normally 170-280 @WalrusAircraft
Great
Okay @IStoleYourMeme
As I am a stickler for realism, most planes during this era had s--- acceleration. Instead of the BEFs, we should use 2 and 4 times J-50s......however......the most realistic would be 10 and 5 times power J-30s. @MrVaultech
Also, it is falloutplayr who is running the RP now. @IStoleYourMeme
We will export modern Maks and other planes to Russia.
Thanks @MasterManufacturingCo
De don't work
We could just-you-Germany killed all the Russians @MrVaultech
No. @General360
Not really, we can just carpet Bomb your workforce if we need to. @MrVaultech
Welcome @SimpleFlow
And, we could just use some FB-2s to Bomb the places that they are being tested and built. @MrVaultech
Welcome @Ageramaster595
Thanks @DestinyAviation
Not really, it would require a total redisign-and then a huge logistical operation. It would take years to fix. @MrVaultech
And some are prop ground pounders-well-some would eat it alive. @Pilotmario
We aren't allied with Russia. We are just not killing each other. @MasterMindIndustries
Tank's roofs are almost always less than 1.5"s thick. The Maus may have more armor up their than most tanks, but it will still be much thinner. If you placed a weapon high enough up-as to hit the roof at a very slight angle......it will most likely kill the tank. This is one of the problems with many modern western tanks, the turret riffs are big-and thin. @MrVaultech
True, but, it would have to travel through other areas to get their.....and.......the roof also becomes an issue in London. @MrVaultech
It was a link to my FB-2 Voltair @DESTROX25
Have you seen any of THESE laying around?
Okay @DESTROX25
New Ground Attack Aircraft
New Bomber
Ohio @DESTROX25
1:19 PM @DESTROX25
Oaky @DESTROX25
It isn't funny. @DESTROX25
It wasn't the logos, but it still looks kool.@Haydenthedrummer
Okay, we will retrieve them in a few hours.....but......we don't need worthless land. @DESTROX25 @MasterMindIndustries
They would just get stuck in the mud. @MrVaultech
The Maus has three main weaknesses-
*Roof Armor-That turret roof is big and thin.
*Coxail Weapon-A 75mm gun-really-it is worthless against attacking infantry. However, with how slow that turret moves you are screwed either way.
*Size and weight-Enemy infantry can hide, or attack from angles were they cannot be shot from. Well, unless the crew exposes themselves. This means, if any enemy troops get close-let's say 7'-they can just chill out behind the turret [another reason the 75mm was a bad idea].
However, these would only come into effect, after they made it to the battle feild. From what I remember, they weigh up to 200,000lbs, which isn't a great idea-especially if they get-stuck. They would have to get stuck in the mud, fall through bridges-basements, get stuck in ditches and stuff like that. They then need to be moved, and, good luck finding something able to move one of them. Them may also suffer from engine issues, but weight alone, would keep them from going anywhere.
It looks kinda funny.
Hmm, we should just get out some fire hoses to stop the Maus.
21:00-5:00
Hmm, we dilike most older soviet weapons. @dzulfikar
Yeah, but some Maks are also laden with bombs. @Pilotmario
Yes, I cannot remember what it was called.@TheOwlAce
No
Alright @dzulfikar
Still,, we would recommend not having to ditch one every time you fly for two hours. We would advocate landing gear. It is easier to reload one of these with the same, perfectly reusable plane, than replaacing an fighter every few days. @DestinyAviation
Your welcome. We will still not allow for you to use it as a weapon. @dzulfikar
We used thermite and napalm mixtures. We will never allow the use of that devilish goo. Besides it has be at least 100 years, and, despite the fact that the weapons we used can melt steel. We are watching a cool, and normal Africa. @dzulfikar
No, we bombed North Africa as well. The Colonists are doing just fine up their. Thermite is completely temporary, well temperature wise. Not damage wise. @dzulfikar
It seem like a waste to just bash it into the ground. Few well of counties wouldve invested in a plane like this. Unless, it also had landing gear. @DestinyAviation
How does it land?
No. It isn't hot, how is that important? @dzulfikar
Awnser, ceramics-however it isn't a toxin ... more a highly unstable, flammable, compound. You are best off using thermite and napalm mixtures-what destroyed Africa the last time. @dzulfikar
It isn't Iran. It is Pakistan @dzulfikar