We tested it against a Verki, other than when this aircraft was diving....the Verki was normally faster and more manuverable. @Areonautics3 @Pilotmario
We looked around, at most current fighter and attack aircraft.....and they are mostly lighter....or the same wheight as this. The FL-23, our main air superiority fighter, which can fly just as fast, much higher, out maneuver it, and carriers more weapons...is only 16-17 thousand pounds. @Areonautics3 @Gmanndo1000
It is pretty bad, to the point of never being combat ready, and doesn't have a reliable electronics suit. It is infact pretty bad, same as the F-35. @Gmanndo1000
No, it is mostly the Marines need for a jet that can take off and land anywhere. The only STOVL that I could see being effective in combat is the Yak-141. @Gmanndo1000 @MikuKat
They don't carry as many weapons as the Su-35, which carry 10-14 missiles so they know they gonna hit. The F-35 carries 4, and as both missile types are not perfect, they might not allways work. @Gmanndo1000 @MikuKat
The Harrier is piss poor as well, however, as the F-35 was never originally a STOVL....which makes it even more deadly to the man flying it. @Gmanndo1000 @MikuKat
No, they are not stealthy, acept from the front and back with some types of radar. They are also inherently bad at flying because they are VTOL. @Gmanndo1000
The tank's hull was made by IVA, the gun by KOR (Korean Ordnance Riffles), and the K-26s are from KREIG, the sights and electronics are from Smasung and Sony. @MasterMindIndustriesAndAviationCorporation
@Pilotmario
Your name is ironic...@Sunnyskies
You shall also learn to fear the Black Sunshine!!! @Areonautics3
I only deal with the role play crowd...I don't have this problem. @GriffithAir
Hallo @SimpleTechAndResearch
Please no....@GriffithAir
@Areonautics3
I still agree @Flightsonic
Yes what.....let me look at his acount. @GriffithAir
No, I agree @Flightsonic
Simple Tech and Research @Dart
Clap Clap Clap @Flightsonic
SALS is back... @Dart
Yep
We are working on a new fighter. We are wondering how to prevent the so called "jump" we it breaks 5000 mph at low altitude. @Pilotmario
Almost all of the planes listed are; faster, have super cruise, and have a better electronics suit. @Gmanndo1000
Also, I quite like the plane.
Stay!
.....That is now the norm for any newer planes. @Gmanndo1000
We tested it against a Verki, other than when this aircraft was diving....the Verki was normally faster and more manuverable. @Areonautics3 @Pilotmario
We looked around, at most current fighter and attack aircraft.....and they are mostly lighter....or the same wheight as this. The FL-23, our main air superiority fighter, which can fly just as fast, much higher, out maneuver it, and carriers more weapons...is only 16-17 thousand pounds. @Areonautics3 @Gmanndo1000
It is just heavier, by a few thousand pounds. @Areonautics3
Also, light fighter my ass! It wheighs almost as much as the FL-22 Siren, a heavy naval fighter! @Areonautics3
Target practice!! @Areonautics3 @Gmanndo1000
The F-22 isn't very fast.... @Gmanndo1000
Welcome@MrSilverWolf
It is pretty bad, to the point of never being combat ready, and doesn't have a reliable electronics suit. It is infact pretty bad, same as the F-35. @Gmanndo1000
Okay, however they are better suited to being loaded with supplies or towing artillery pieces. @Gmanndo1000
No, it is mostly the Marines need for a jet that can take off and land anywhere. The only STOVL that I could see being effective in combat is the Yak-141. @Gmanndo1000 @MikuKat
They don't carry as many weapons as the Su-35, which carry 10-14 missiles so they know they gonna hit. The F-35 carries 4, and as both missile types are not perfect, they might not allways work. @Gmanndo1000 @MikuKat
The Harrier is piss poor as well, however, as the F-35 was never originally a STOVL....which makes it even more deadly to the man flying it. @Gmanndo1000 @MikuKat
We will tear your fledged army to pieces! @AyemRodrigoDuterte
No, they are not stealthy, acept from the front and back with some types of radar. They are also inherently bad at flying because they are VTOL. @Gmanndo1000
Just look it up. Euros to dollars and enter 50,700 on the Euro side. (Their is no US, so, you may as well just cough up the Euros) @Gmanndo1000
No @AyemRodrigoDuterte
Each unit is 50,700 Euros @Gmanndo1000
Welcome @RAF1
And a APC, although bugs have slowed my progress. @Pilotmario
We are working on a heavy transport truck for a similar role.
The tank's hull was made by IVA, the gun by KOR (Korean Ordnance Riffles), and the K-26s are from KREIG, the sights and electronics are from Smasung and Sony. @MasterMindIndustriesAndAviationCorporation
We have a newer test design, it will be formed into the last of the ADs. @Pilotmario
Can I make a truck or AFV? @DisferGoatz
Exactly the point @Areonautics3
Hmm, a FL-23 (wich can act in the same way as a Renegade), can fly over 100,000 feet @Areonautics3 @Pilotmario
Although we operate BA-21 EWCs and other types that allow continued radar support. @Pilotmario
We are currently working on a MLRS. @Pilotmario
As I stated earlier @MikuKat @Areonautics3
Yep @Pilotmario
Ok @EternalDarkness
I know.....I was confirming to Aeronautics3 that Japan was a teritory. @Pilotmario