Combat Ambulance and Airport Fire Truck. The desing process for making the APC-2 was literally:
"Bill!"-1
"What?"-2
"You know that new fire truck?"-1
"What about it?"-2
"If we modify it to be 6x6, lighten the vehicle, remove the fire equipment, armor it, and add seats . . . it makes a perfect APC"-1
"Well sh-t, let's produce it"-2@Pilotmario
Okay, we have something similar. However, here is something funny to me.
A APC-2 can out preform the CA version of this vehicle. The former is a 6x6 based on a APFT, the other is a 4x4 LTP, with a slightly edited rear.......it is kinda dumb. @Pilotmario
We, the diesel does't care about the fuels used in it, we can see you reasons. Although your most recent comment is a mystery to me, if you are talking about weapons . . . then it can do the same. Kerosene and diesel are our most common fuels. We never, ever, as a rule that can get you stripped of rank, put a jet or high octane fuel in anything that moves on the ground. Unless it is a last resort fuel, when all others have ran out.
To be honest, I don't know, or care what goes on in the NTD. When they are doing millitary tests, as long as no one is hurt, I don't care. @MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
.....Its a roleplay.....things can be fictional.
The IVA-7 is a linage of light wheight military and civilian SUVs, and LTPs. They are of a similar size to this vehicle, however are slightly taller and have better ground clearance. IVA-7s, in their newer versions are noted for their comfortable interior and low fuel usage, however, the version used (that is also on my profile) is a MKVIII. They are rugged, simplistic, and tough. They have a top speed of 130mph in the civilian version, however, the military version has a speed of 110mph . . . despite the more powerful engine.
Both the Humvee and IVA-7M mount the same weaponry and armor . . . although the IVA-7 can be use to tow equipment unlike this vehicle. Although the key difference is ground clearance and engine performance . . . other than looks. @SteadfastContracting
They are all quite modern, with the SPG-1 being the only one in need of replacement. They all sport good armor for their class, withe the MBTs being excidingly well armed (132 or 122mm coilguns), and being quite stealthy.
The SA sports a very advanced 12-band radar, and light wheight IR system. Giving it the ability to detect any known aircraft.
The APCs, provide adequate protection from 30mm APFSDS rounds . . . and have a very comfortable interior. They can mount a variety of weapons and other modules.
The TDs mount 132mm coilguns, or 90mm rail guns . . . and are light wheight an air droppable. Both can take 30mm APFSDS from all sides . . . and one sports an unmanned turret.
The truck and SUV are simple, easy to maintain and deploy, and sport enough armor to protect from small arms. They aren't true frontline vehicles, and don't need as much armor. @MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation @LeHoneyBadger
Hi, I own and have VETO power over Japan. They also share my millitary might, with an additional four million personel. This will also anger all NRNW members, including, Awwam, the PR, and Poland . . . whom we still have ties to. It will also bring in, SALS and the GAE, and possibly more. I will warn you to leave Japan alone. @MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
We don't dislike them in that way, we dislike them logistically.
We have found that the type uses four times as much fuel as a IVA-7 . . . that is equally armored/armed. We also think the engine is to complex, the 199HP KER-5 diesel is so much simpler then that use by this vehicle.
Actually, I keep a Mini-14 Ranch-Riffle carbine in my closet. Devastating peice of kit in close quarters, especially; homes, prisons, and other buildings. @arcues
No, no, no, this roleplay is very realistic . . . with only vehicles and technology that could exist in real life . . . and yes it could work in real life. However, based on how actual tanks preform, it's sh-t. @Pilotmario @EclipseRed @Gmanndo1000
With a single hatch, most likely with a crew member sat directly under it. The crew will most likely to have to scurry through the vehicle, and as such, over any dead crew members!! @EclipseRed
This a TD, often given a 90mm RG or 132mm CG.@Pilotmario
This isn't a TD, it's a SPG! @Pilotmario
I am just going to grab this sledgehammer, and test the safety of Soviet bombs. @RAF1
Especially a bomb like that.
@RAF1
I woldn't like to fly with explosives clipped through my plane. @RAF1
Is that safe?
Quank...
@Pilotmario
Thanks @Sharky
Combat Ambulance and Airport Fire Truck. The desing process for making the APC-2 was literally:
"Bill!"-1
"What?"-2
"You know that new fire truck?"-1
"What about it?"-2
"If we modify it to be 6x6, lighten the vehicle, remove the fire equipment, armor it, and add seats . . . it makes a perfect APC"-1
"Well sh-t, let's produce it"-2@Pilotmario
The FL-20S is decently fast compared to many of their fighters, although newer types are much faster. @Pilotmario
Okay, we have something similar. However, here is something funny to me.
A APC-2 can out preform the CA version of this vehicle. The former is a 6x6 based on a APFT, the other is a 4x4 LTP, with a slightly edited rear.......it is kinda dumb. @Pilotmario
He also said you cannot rely on maneuverability like many of my fighters.....!! @SimpleTechAndResearch @Pilotmario
This is quite similar to the APC-2 w/AT turret.
We, the diesel does't care about the fuels used in it, we can see you reasons. Although your most recent comment is a mystery to me, if you are talking about weapons . . . then it can do the same. Kerosene and diesel are our most common fuels. We never, ever, as a rule that can get you stripped of rank, put a jet or high octane fuel in anything that moves on the ground. Unless it is a last resort fuel, when all others have ran out.
Kigzer is dead... @Mudkip
Your welcome. @SteadfastContracting
Bend over backwards, and open wide. (Not your mouth) @Mudkip
It is pretty bad. @SimpleTechAndResearch
To be honest, I don't know, or care what goes on in the NTD. When they are doing millitary tests, as long as no one is hurt, I don't care. @MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
You have offended it@SteadfastContracting
.....Its a roleplay.....things can be fictional.
The IVA-7 is a linage of light wheight military and civilian SUVs, and LTPs. They are of a similar size to this vehicle, however are slightly taller and have better ground clearance. IVA-7s, in their newer versions are noted for their comfortable interior and low fuel usage, however, the version used (that is also on my profile) is a MKVIII. They are rugged, simplistic, and tough. They have a top speed of 130mph in the civilian version, however, the military version has a speed of 110mph . . . despite the more powerful engine.
Both the Humvee and IVA-7M mount the same weaponry and armor . . . although the IVA-7 can be use to tow equipment unlike this vehicle. Although the key difference is ground clearance and engine performance . . . other than looks. @SteadfastContracting
Airport Fire Truck, and the ARV will take a few seconds to complete . . . as work was already under way. @Pilotmario
They are all quite modern, with the SPG-1 being the only one in need of replacement. They all sport good armor for their class, withe the MBTs being excidingly well armed (132 or 122mm coilguns), and being quite stealthy.
The SA sports a very advanced 12-band radar, and light wheight IR system. Giving it the ability to detect any known aircraft.
The APCs, provide adequate protection from 30mm APFSDS rounds . . . and have a very comfortable interior. They can mount a variety of weapons and other modules.
The TDs mount 132mm coilguns, or 90mm rail guns . . . and are light wheight an air droppable. Both can take 30mm APFSDS from all sides . . . and one sports an unmanned turret.
The truck and SUV are simple, easy to maintain and deploy, and sport enough armor to protect from small arms. They aren't true frontline vehicles, and don't need as much armor. @MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation @LeHoneyBadger
Ha!! They haven't got anything of ours more modern than a FL-13!!! Or a MAK-141! Target practice for FL-24s, and any of our modern fighters!! @MikuKat
TD-1
TD-2R-C
APC-2AT variant
APC-3 (AMP) variant
APC-4
MBT-5A
MBT-5B
MBT-6D TUCK
IVA-5 S-A
IVA-3M
IVA-7M (this is a millitary version of the vehicle shown
SPG-1, to be replaced soon
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation @GoldenEagle @DRP @EclipseRed @MikuKat @LeHoneyBadger
Okay....? @GoldenEagle
We also have excellent ground forces, as such, ours are comparable to the PR's. [More diverse, and realistic than yours] @GoldenEagle
I build support vehicles, I am debating making a a APFT, currently. @Pilotmario
MBT CONTEST!!!!
PINK IS F-CKING HAPPY AS SH-T!!!!!
YEAH MBTS!!!!@Pilotmario
You have some ties with me, Awwam's pet. (You are Awwam's pet) @MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
Hi, I own and have VETO power over Japan. They also share my millitary might, with an additional four million personel. This will also anger all NRNW members, including, Awwam, the PR, and Poland . . . whom we still have ties to. It will also bring in, SALS and the GAE, and possibly more. I will warn you to leave Japan alone. @MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
[]
[]
[]
\/ @SteadfastContracting
We don't dislike them in that way, we dislike them logistically.
We have found that the type uses four times as much fuel as a IVA-7 . . . that is equally armored/armed. We also think the engine is to complex, the 199HP KER-5 diesel is so much simpler then that use by this vehicle.
I dislike these vehicles with a passion. @Pilotmario
I am pretty sure that is illegal in most (all) countries. @amazingperson124
You aren't wrong, although some animals will seek out humans. @RailfanEthan
I basically have this, but with a thicker barrel @arcues
Okay, I tend to keep a some longer knives . . . but still that gun. @arcues
The steering came from the AMX-10RC @Pilotmario
Actually, I keep a Mini-14 Ranch-Riffle carbine in my closet. Devastating peice of kit in close quarters, especially; homes, prisons, and other buildings. @arcues
Why I,picked it.@AughtFour
Thanks @Pilotmario
This@AughtFour
Don't @EclipseRed
No, no, no, this roleplay is very realistic . . . with only vehicles and technology that could exist in real life . . . and yes it could work in real life. However, based on how actual tanks preform, it's sh-t. @Pilotmario @EclipseRed @Gmanndo1000
This is constructive criticizim . . . in this roleplay . . . it would not do well. @EclipseRed
With a single hatch, most likely with a crew member sat directly under it. The crew will most likely to have to scurry through the vehicle, and as such, over any dead crew members!! @EclipseRed
Do you like climbing over dead bodies? I also said "at least", ie: there can be more!! @EclipseRed
One hatch, at least two crew . . . maths? @EclipseRed @Pilotmario