We tested it against a Verki, other than when this aircraft was diving....the Verki was normally faster and more manuverable. @Areonautics3 @Pilotmario
We looked around, at most current fighter and attack aircraft.....and they are mostly lighter....or the same wheight as this. The FL-23, our main air superiority fighter, which can fly just as fast, much higher, out maneuver it, and carriers more weapons...is only 16-17 thousand pounds. @Areonautics3 @Gmanndo1000
It is pretty bad, to the point of never being combat ready, and doesn't have a reliable electronics suit. It is infact pretty bad, same as the F-35. @Gmanndo1000
No, it is mostly the Marines need for a jet that can take off and land anywhere. The only STOVL that I could see being effective in combat is the Yak-141. @Gmanndo1000 @MikuKat
They don't carry as many weapons as the Su-35, which carry 10-14 missiles so they know they gonna hit. The F-35 carries 4, and as both missile types are not perfect, they might not allways work. @Gmanndo1000 @MikuKat
The Harrier is piss poor as well, however, as the F-35 was never originally a STOVL....which makes it even more deadly to the man flying it. @Gmanndo1000 @MikuKat
No, they are not stealthy, acept from the front and back with some types of radar. They are also inherently bad at flying because they are VTOL. @Gmanndo1000
The tank's hull was made by IVA, the gun by KOR (Korean Ordnance Riffles), and the K-26s are from KREIG, the sights and electronics are from Smasung and Sony. @MasterMindIndustriesAndAviationCorporation
I was able to halve its turning circle and decriminalization its takeoff time by adding a inveresed pitch surface in each wing. (In the space bettween the roll surface and the wing's attachment point.
They are superior to Japanese, Varndan, Tueton, and Polish weapons. We are to almost entirely equivalent to, or surpassing the PR in some regards.@Areonautics3
You shall also learn to fear the Black Sunshine!!! @Areonautics3
I only deal with the role play crowd...I don't have this problem. @GriffithAir
Hallo @SimpleTechAndResearch
Please no....@GriffithAir
@Areonautics3
I still agree @Flightsonic
Yes what.....let me look at his acount. @GriffithAir
No, I agree @Flightsonic
Simple Tech and Research @Dart
Clap Clap Clap @Flightsonic
SALS is back... @Dart
Yep
We are working on a new fighter. We are wondering how to prevent the so called "jump" we it breaks 5000 mph at low altitude. @Pilotmario
Almost all of the planes listed are; faster, have super cruise, and have a better electronics suit. @Gmanndo1000
Also, I quite like the plane.
Stay!
.....That is now the norm for any newer planes. @Gmanndo1000
We tested it against a Verki, other than when this aircraft was diving....the Verki was normally faster and more manuverable. @Areonautics3 @Pilotmario
We looked around, at most current fighter and attack aircraft.....and they are mostly lighter....or the same wheight as this. The FL-23, our main air superiority fighter, which can fly just as fast, much higher, out maneuver it, and carriers more weapons...is only 16-17 thousand pounds. @Areonautics3 @Gmanndo1000
It is just heavier, by a few thousand pounds. @Areonautics3
Also, light fighter my ass! It wheighs almost as much as the FL-22 Siren, a heavy naval fighter! @Areonautics3
Target practice!! @Areonautics3 @Gmanndo1000
The F-22 isn't very fast.... @Gmanndo1000
Welcome@MrSilverWolf
It is pretty bad, to the point of never being combat ready, and doesn't have a reliable electronics suit. It is infact pretty bad, same as the F-35. @Gmanndo1000
Okay, however they are better suited to being loaded with supplies or towing artillery pieces. @Gmanndo1000
No, it is mostly the Marines need for a jet that can take off and land anywhere. The only STOVL that I could see being effective in combat is the Yak-141. @Gmanndo1000 @MikuKat
They don't carry as many weapons as the Su-35, which carry 10-14 missiles so they know they gonna hit. The F-35 carries 4, and as both missile types are not perfect, they might not allways work. @Gmanndo1000 @MikuKat
The Harrier is piss poor as well, however, as the F-35 was never originally a STOVL....which makes it even more deadly to the man flying it. @Gmanndo1000 @MikuKat
We will tear your fledged army to pieces! @AyemRodrigoDuterte
No, they are not stealthy, acept from the front and back with some types of radar. They are also inherently bad at flying because they are VTOL. @Gmanndo1000
Just look it up. Euros to dollars and enter 50,700 on the Euro side. (Their is no US, so, you may as well just cough up the Euros) @Gmanndo1000
No @AyemRodrigoDuterte
Each unit is 50,700 Euros @Gmanndo1000
Welcome @RAF1
And a APC, although bugs have slowed my progress. @Pilotmario
We are working on a heavy transport truck for a similar role.
The tank's hull was made by IVA, the gun by KOR (Korean Ordnance Riffles), and the K-26s are from KREIG, the sights and electronics are from Smasung and Sony. @MasterMindIndustriesAndAviationCorporation
We have a newer test design, it will be formed into the last of the ADs. @Pilotmario
Can I make a truck or AFV? @DisferGoatz
Exactly the point @Areonautics3
Hmm, a FL-23 (wich can act in the same way as a Renegade), can fly over 100,000 feet @Areonautics3 @Pilotmario
Although we operate BA-21 EWCs and other types that allow continued radar support. @Pilotmario
We are currently working on a MLRS. @Pilotmario
As I stated earlier @MikuKat @Areonautics3
Yep @Pilotmario
Ok @EternalDarkness
I know.....I was confirming to Aeronautics3 that Japan was a teritory. @Pilotmario
I was able to halve its turning circle and decriminalization its takeoff time by adding a inveresed pitch surface in each wing. (In the space bettween the roll surface and the wing's attachment point.
They are superior to Japanese, Varndan, Tueton, and Polish weapons. We are to almost entirely equivalent to, or surpassing the PR in some regards.@Areonautics3