@Pilotmario An iPad 2, post 1.4 has ruined it.
The new islands to be more precise . . . I used to be able to have 300 parts without Snowstone and Sky Park.
@Pilotmario You shouldn't need to, a the L7a3 has similar performance to the 120mm L44 or L55 . . . when it is at least .50 long.
As such, we believe a .50, multi-stage coil gun would have similar performance.
@Supermini555 No, we have dismissed plasma cannons . . . we hit tanks like these 5 miles out with a 120mm HEAT-AS shell.
These would lack the range to fire back. @DankDorito @Supermini555
@Supermini555 Those are rail and coil guns . . . . a plasma cannon would fire a ball or beam of super heated gas. Much in the same way that a flame thrower works, with many of the same downsides.
I have many reason . . .
1. Anti-Tank missiles have almost deadly back blast, by almost, I meant it often times is.
2. Too large for its role . . . it is pretty tall.
3. It is only armed with an automatic cannon . . . when it comes to convetional fire power.
4. It doesn't share any parts with existing vehicles.
5. Not enough armor
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
To be honest, the only true heavy fire support weapon for this vehicle would be a 105mm LV-Coilgun.
Missiles are dangerous to dismounting Infanty and other vehicles. @TheBroadside
@Viper28
Check your K-10. @Pilotmario
Just paint over the post WWI Iron Cross. @CaesiciusPlanes
Thanks @DragonAerotech
@CaesiciusPlanes
I hope you understand what we mean by, "Monkey see, Monkey do" . . . when it concerns the WWI role play. @Pilotmario
These aren't needed. @DankDorito
@Pilotmario Like the real WWI, monkey see . . . monkey do.
@RAF1 Your welcome!
@TemDesBur I have been playing those for a long time . . .
No, I meant it doesn't achieve one of the many aims of a bullpup. @Pilotmario
@Pilotmario It isn't shorter . .
@Rohan I didn't say anything more.
@Supermini555 The velocity of the weapon is too low . . . it is like tying to hit a target with a KV-2 . . . but 400m out.@Pilotmario
Okay@Pilotmario
@Pilotmario An iPad 2, post 1.4 has ruined it.
The new islands to be more precise . . . I used to be able to have 300 parts without Snowstone and Sky Park.
@Pilotmario I cannot wait to get a PC . . . and to give you some back ground information . . . the MBT-2 Cobra brakes my game.
@Pilotmario Ahh
@Pilotmario I want to test the damn thing . . . not look at it.
@Pilotmario We noted that when desperate, they would use mines as a counter to armor.
@Pilotmario I can't.
@Pilotmario You shouldn't need to, a the L7a3 has similar performance to the 120mm L44 or L55 . . . when it is at least .50 long.
As such, we believe a .50, multi-stage coil gun would have similar performance.
@Pilotmario About the same time it took to get the APC-7 to work.
@Pilotmario However, it is big.
Dammit, you beat me to it!!
@DankDorito The original can two, but I am begging you to stop wasting money.
@Supermini555 they have horrid accuracy and are unable to hit a moving target.
@DankDorito Please forget that idea.
A version with a 105mm LP-Gun may be an order.
@DankDorito It shalt not.
@Supermini555 No, we have dismissed plasma cannons . . . we hit tanks like these 5 miles out with a 120mm HEAT-AS shell.
These would lack the range to fire back. @DankDorito @Supermini555
@Supermini555 Those are rail and coil guns . . . . a plasma cannon would fire a ball or beam of super heated gas. Much in the same way that a flame thrower works, with many of the same downsides.
@Supermini555 It is just an ordinary plasma cannon, the original laser thing you went on about isn't at all similar to a plasma weapon.
@Pilotmario VERY
@Viper28 Okay.
I am just gonna edit it . . . . for the operators sake.
@Viper28 In what way? Although this one was designed for island hopping.
@Viper28 You can choose either the IFV-2 or this . . . this does have turrets and weapons available.
@TheTekkit101 If you can get me about 20 screen shots from every angle known to man, then I may be able to attempt doing so.
@Flash0of0green That is why the 105mm exists . . . 1 in 4 has one.
Also shorten the over hang on the fenders. @DankDorito
A coaxial has nothing to do with wheels. @DankDorito
Also, I can't see the coaxial. @DankDorito
I meant over the tracks @DankDorito
Needs a coaxial, and shorten the forward most slopes......fenders are also needed. @DankDorito
I have many reason . . .
1. Anti-Tank missiles have almost deadly back blast, by almost, I meant it often times is.
2. Too large for its role . . . it is pretty tall.
3. It is only armed with an automatic cannon . . . when it comes to convetional fire power.
4. It doesn't share any parts with existing vehicles.
5. Not enough armor
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
Not as useful as a 105mm gun, by a long shot. @Flash0of0green
@TheBroadside
To be honest, the only true heavy fire support weapon for this vehicle would be a 105mm LV-Coilgun.
Missiles are dangerous to dismounting Infanty and other vehicles. @TheBroadside
@Pilotmario "Note the description"