@C47skytrain But Tbh I Kinda Don't Give A F*ck (Don't {Really} Care) About Part Count, Because I Mainly Focussing On Performance Cost (I Tried To Keep It Bellow 1000 So Its Gonna Be So Mobile Friendly)
~
It Is Pointless If An Aircraft Got Very Low Part Count But Got Performance Cost So High (And Lot Of PEA Aircrafts Got This Problem)
@C47skytrain Here Is A Good News For You : The Older Version Got 112 Parts Only (For The 130A Variants) And The Updated One (Soon) Will Retain That Part Count !
~
And It Can Be Just 100 Parts If You Removed Some Small Details ! (Aerials And Antenas)
Honorable Mentions : @Angelcod73 , @Bryan5
+1Honorable Mentions : @Monarchii , @MAPA , @WHNineTripleOne
+2@Zhixunlin23 * : Additional Note
+1To Pronounce "Okanieba" : "Ohka" + "Nibba"
@Zhixunlin23 Yes, Also Low Part (Under 300 Parts). Also, Old-Gen RD Btw*
+1@Zhixunlin23 Yes, RD Is ReinMcDeer, RD Style
+1Requested By : @MACCOD , @Wywtt080 , @NEOCORP
Tag : @rorrE
Tags : @SamTheUncle , @MonsNotTheMonster , @DatFiat126Fan19
Honorable Mention : @ReinMcDeer
Honorable Mentions : @Angelcod73 , @Bryan5
Honorable Mentions : @Monarchii , @MAPA , @WHNineTripleOne
Finally, Revised CRJ 100-500 Winglets
+1@MACCOD Thanks For The Tip Bud
@LunarEclipseSP
ENEMY A-10 ABOVE !
~ Call Of Duty
+1Requested By : @MACCOD , @Wywtt080
Tag : @rorrE
Tags : @SamTheUncle , @MonsNotTheMonster , @DatFiat126Fan19
Honorable Mention : @ReinMcDeer
+1Honorable Mentions : @Angelcod73 , @Bryan5
Honorable Mentions : @Monarchii , @MAPA , @WHNineTripleOne
Credits : @RealXChannel
@DatFiat126Fan19 Check My Account, Its Already Out !
@NEOCORP Soon ! Alongside The C-130Js
Stay Tuned, I'll Tag Yaa
AC-130H Soon ! Stay Tuned !
T For Tags !
Requested By : @MACCOD , @Wywtt080
Tags : @SamTheUncle , @MonsNotTheMonster , @DatFiat126Fan19
Honorable Mention : @ReinMcDeer
Honorable Mentions : @Angelcod73 , @Bryan5
Honorable Mentions : @Monarchii , @MAPA , @WHNineTripleOne
Requested By : @MACCOD , @Wywtt080
Tags : @SamTheUncle , @MonsNotTheMonster , @@DatFiat126Fan19
Honorable Mention : @ReinMcDeer
Honorable Mentions : @Angelcod73 , @Bryan5
Honorable Mentions : @Monarchii , @MAPA , @WHNineTripleOne
Requested By : @MACCOD , @Wywtt080
Tags : @SamTheUncle , @MonsNotTheMonster , @@DatFiat126Fan19
Honorable Mention : @ReinMcDeer
Honorable Mentions : @Angelcod73 , @Bryan5
Honorable Mentions : @Monarchii , @MAPA , @WHNineTripleOne
@Maverick09 Daymn Congrats ! Le Vark Is Returned
+1@Dest20345 Can You Read ?
@ShinyGemsBro Oka Sir, Also Apologize/Pardon
+1Quote Of Today :
"It Is Pointless If An Aircraft Got Very Low Part Count But Got Performance Cost So High"
~ Fadel FDL / New World Aerospace
@SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore Thanks ! Yea I Make It Realistic So Anyone Can Enjoy The Assembly Progress
+1@C47skytrain But Tbh I Kinda Don't Give A F*ck (Don't {Really} Care) About Part Count, Because I Mainly Focussing On Performance Cost (I Tried To Keep It Bellow 1000 So Its Gonna Be So Mobile Friendly)
~
It Is Pointless If An Aircraft Got Very Low Part Count But Got Performance Cost So High (And Lot Of PEA Aircrafts Got This Problem)
@C47skytrain Here Is A Good News For You : The Older Version Got 112 Parts Only (For The 130A Variants) And The Updated One (Soon) Will Retain That Part Count !
~
And It Can Be Just 100 Parts If You Removed Some Small Details ! (Aerials And Antenas)
+1Honorable Mention : @ReinMcDeer
+1Honorable Mentions : @ShinyGemsBro , @Angelcod73 , @Bryan5
+1Honorable Mentions : @Monarchii , @MAPA , @WHNineTripleOne
+1@C47skytrain Yes It Is ! It Will Be Low Part, Both Part And Performance Efficient !