@MrPorg137 ahhh okay fair enough. There are pretty simple ones you can make with only 8 extra pieces but that does include two rotators so I understand
This is pretty good looking but the flight characteristics, especially during take off, need some work. It also looks a little too thick at the rear but overall it’s quite a nice build, especially with that expertly built cockpit!
@teodor99 I’m not too sure. I didn’t expect this plane to do as well as it did but I’m happy people like it since it’s my personal favourite out of all the ones I made
Very very nice! Some opening bomb bay doors would be a lovely addition too. The wing size also looks a bit too small for the overall length. They could be a little wider at the roots
Hahaha sure thing buddy. I like your builds and you have good taste in aircraft. Also just because something is simple on SP doesn’t mean it can’t be deserving of a lot of upvotes hahaha. A few of my higher rated planes only took two or so hours to make
@Subnerdica actually here is something really funny. The first set of booms and tail I used came from a build I made a long long time ago that was supposed to be a sea vixen (but looked nothing like one). So originally, the booms came off an attempted sea vixen build hahaha
I don’t have the issue you seem to have. I do have this specific problem on occasion but I just reattach a scaled down wing. Glad it’s fixed though! Also I had quite a few landings where the prop was destroyed because the landing was a little rough (on the aircraft carrier most landings are rough). You might wanna take a look at that!
@TheSleepingInsomniac haha thanks for that. It does have trim though! Also yeah I know it rolls because of the slight weight imbalance but it’s not too harsh. Thanks for your nice comment though! Feel free to upvote the plane if you like it hahaha
Nice! Thank you for your participation! Just to let you know, your plane isn’t disqualified but it’s not from the time period so it will lose some points from the requirements
I love the shape of most of this plane. The tail isn’t my favourite but that’s just down to personal preference. The engine and wing shapes are great though!
@Brencool35 as long as it was used between 1945-1950 that’s okay. The plane doesn’t have to be produced or designed between that period. Which plane is it?
@Subnerdica specifically in the Luftwaffe?
@MrPorg137 ahhh okay fair enough. There are pretty simple ones you can make with only 8 extra pieces but that does include two rotators so I understand
This is pretty decent. I feel like a touched up one of these would be cool for my naval aviation challenge. You should make one for it!
Ahahaha you actually did it! Imagine how long it would take for all of them to fire
@DJS8Corporations yup! Everyone can enter up to three planes. If three isn’t enough and enough people want to enter a fourth, I will allow it
@teodor99 okay I’ll do that :)
This is pretty good looking but the flight characteristics, especially during take off, need some work. It also looks a little too thick at the rear but overall it’s quite a nice build, especially with that expertly built cockpit!
@teodor99 you should! I have a bunch of xml custom gears. If you want I can put them all in a post for you
@1472 yeah you’re probably right, time to add more
@teodor99 I’m not too sure. I didn’t expect this plane to do as well as it did but I’m happy people like it since it’s my personal favourite out of all the ones I made
Wonderfully made! Thank you for this second entry.
@teodor99 wow that’s higher than I thought it would be. Thanks very much!
Do you think it has enough rockets?
This is looking really good so far!
@teodor99 also if you like this one feel free to leave an upvote hahaha
@teodor99 well for your answer, look up MiG-21I Analog. In my opinion, the answer is sort of but that specific delta wing looks a bit odd as it’s huge
@teodor99 well fair enough then. It’s still a great build nonetheless!
Pretty neat! Reminds me a little of a 109. A slightly better paint job and some landing gear would make it almost perfect!
Very interesting design. Cool way to make a plane fly!
Very very nice! Some opening bomb bay doors would be a lovely addition too. The wing size also looks a bit too small for the overall length. They could be a little wider at the roots
Hahaha sure thing buddy. I like your builds and you have good taste in aircraft. Also just because something is simple on SP doesn’t mean it can’t be deserving of a lot of upvotes hahaha. A few of my higher rated planes only took two or so hours to make
Very cool design! It feels like it needs some huge plasma cannon hahaha
It’s disturbing that this got no upvotes. It’s very nice!
Pretty nice! Is this supposed to be the Su-27k?
@Subnerdica also if you like it feel free to leave an upvote hahaha
@Subnerdica actually here is something really funny. The first set of booms and tail I used came from a build I made a long long time ago that was supposed to be a sea vixen (but looked nothing like one). So originally, the booms came off an attempted sea vixen build hahaha
@ND40X on some builds which work great for everyone else, the planes will just explode when I turn or retract the landing gear lol
@RhysBrown and thank you very much for the spotlight!
This is amazing! How does this only have two upvotes??? That’s a crime!
@RhysBrown fantastic! Can’t wait to see your build!
@BeefyBoy4516 no problem!
I don’t have the issue you seem to have. I do have this specific problem on occasion but I just reattach a scaled down wing. Glad it’s fixed though! Also I had quite a few landings where the prop was destroyed because the landing was a little rough (on the aircraft carrier most landings are rough). You might wanna take a look at that!
@ND40X sure thing. I’m on my way home now so I will take a look once I’m there
Very cool! Thank you for your participation in the challenge!
@ND40X i know that feeling exactly. I had that constantly with the flying wing bomber I have. It was very difficult to make it fly at all decently.
@jamesPLANESii oops! I thought this was on another post hahaha. I’m very distracted today and I shouldn’t be looking at SP at work lol
@ND40X okay I’ll take a look at it in a little while.
@ayou2005 lol what a rude kid. You seem very upset by this, are you okay?
@TheSleepingInsomniac haha thanks for that. It does have trim though! Also yeah I know it rolls because of the slight weight imbalance but it’s not too harsh. Thanks for your nice comment though! Feel free to upvote the plane if you like it hahaha
Maybe make another entry from a plane that is
Nice! Thank you for your participation! Just to let you know, your plane isn’t disqualified but it’s not from the time period so it will lose some points from the requirements
@LockheedLover modern problems require modern solutions... oh wait this is the 1940s damn
@Iliketobreakthegame cheers buddy!
@SovietT44 you could probably put it in a forum post or on this one but I don’t know how unfortunately
Great! Thanks for your participation!
@Brencool35 I’ll accept it since the hurricane itself was used well into the late 1940s
I love the shape of most of this plane. The tail isn’t my favourite but that’s just down to personal preference. The engine and wing shapes are great though!
@SovietT44 which kind of 21 was it? An F13?
@Brencool35 as long as it was used between 1945-1950 that’s okay. The plane doesn’t have to be produced or designed between that period. Which plane is it?
Pretty decent build, you just need to take a better first picture! It reminds me a little of a MiG-21 too