@Chingonito if you’re having trouble building on this scale, you can build it larger and then xml mod it to be scaled down to fit your aircraft. I hope that helps!
Lovely! If you want to make this more mobile friendly for those who have weaker devices, you should lower the drag points. That causes more lag than the part count in this build
@Helpimmabug you have to add wing parts. When you’re in the parts section, click on wings and then add enough until it flies well. After that, you can mod them to be small. If you add the wings, post the build unlisted and I will modify them to be smaller for you. Then you can repost it with the aircraft flying :)
@UnicornMike I figured hahaha. You should add a description to your builds that has instructions and a little something about them. You should also add tags to it like “Star Wars” and “fighter”
You have to move the CoL back. You can either do that by moving the wings to the rear, or you can add more wings to the back, scale them down to 0.1,0.1,0.1 and then hide them inside the aircraft. I hope this helps!
This is great and pretty useful! It does work much better when it’s dark in the SP world but very cool that you can change the time it goes up to relatively easy. This will be great to use to compare a builds flight characteristics compared to the real thing
This is a very cool aircraft! Seems like you could fit a lot of these on an aircraft carrier. Also I think if you painted it in some brighter colours (maybe glossy aircraft aluminium), it would look better and pop out more in the first screenshot
This is a very well made Heinkel 111. The detailing is impeccable and it’s profile is exactly like the real thing. I will say that it does feel way too manoeuvrable but it’s looks definitely compensate for that. Overall its fantastic
This is a really nice and cool looking build! It flies well and is pretty unique too. Also, if you move the landing gear more to the middle of the plane but still behind the CoM, it will take off much better
@enginer365 don’t worry about that too much. If you really want to make it, you should make the symbol quite large at first and then scale it down to the size it needs to be to sit nicely on the car. I hope this helps!
@Waffloe lol good idea but it actually stands for model. They give the same M designation to all different types of weaponry and ground vehicles, but they start the number again every time it’s a new category of equipment. That’s why I can think of 8 different things called M1 and there are probably even more hahaha
@ChiChiWerx thanks so much for the feedback! It means a lot since your builds are of a caliber that I aspire to be able to reach. Do you have any recommendations for getting the landings to be smoother? It seems that I either have to compromise on overly soft suspension or a “bit” of a bumpy landing. Also thanks so much for the spotlight!
This looks cool and I love the custom control surfaces but it has no wing area! For this build you’re gonna need at least 300-400ft^2. You can hide wing parts scaling them down to 0.1,0.1,0.1 and nudge them into the wing and fuselage. I hope to see a fixed version soon!
@ChiChiWerx I was pretty I inspired by one of your forum posts on realistic flying aircraft when I was making this one and I was wondering what your thoughts on the characteristics of this one are. It’s definitely not perfect and the landing isn’t great but I’m pretty happy with the acceleration and turn rate of the aircraft. Am I on the right track?
@TheFionn up to you man! Everyone can choose what they prioritise. Personally I think you need a good mix between it and that’s what I try to do for my builds
@fantastekgamer Check out this one too!
@fantastekgamer cheers mate!
@Chingonito if you’re having trouble building on this scale, you can build it larger and then xml mod it to be scaled down to fit your aircraft. I hope that helps!
@Dragons103 no rush :)
The detail on this is phenomenal by the way!
+1Lovely! If you want to make this more mobile friendly for those who have weaker devices, you should lower the drag points. That causes more lag than the part count in this build
@blindspot61 you’re welcome!
@Helpimmabug you have to add wing parts. When you’re in the parts section, click on wings and then add enough until it flies well. After that, you can mod them to be small. If you add the wings, post the build unlisted and I will modify them to be smaller for you. Then you can repost it with the aircraft flying :)
Lovely build! You don’t see too many of these around SP
@UnicornMike pretty neat!
@UnicornMike I figured hahaha. You should add a description to your builds that has instructions and a little something about them. You should also add tags to it like “Star Wars” and “fighter”
@edog6504 no problem!
@gavin1234 cool!
Awesome! I don’t think I’ve ever seen one of these on SP before. The Mustang in its ultimate ground attack form
+1This is a really cool aircraft! I love the idea of a navalised A-10
+1I see you’re not new to SimplePlanes. Welcome back!
Cool Tie fighter! For one of your first uploads this is really fantastic. Lovely job!
You have to move the CoL back. You can either do that by moving the wings to the rear, or you can add more wings to the back, scale them down to 0.1,0.1,0.1 and then hide them inside the aircraft. I hope this helps!
I see you’re new though so you might want to take a look at the Rules Page . I’m looking forward to seeing your original creations! :)
Isn’t this exactly the same as the original post?
I want to comment about how awesome this build looks, that it functions great, and that I love type XXI’s but all I can think about is that Haunebu
This is great and pretty useful! It does work much better when it’s dark in the SP world but very cool that you can change the time it goes up to relatively easy. This will be great to use to compare a builds flight characteristics compared to the real thing
@ChiChiWerx okay I’ll stick to that then. It does seem like the better of the two. Thanks for the help!
Your ships are phenomenal. I feel inclined to follow to make sure I don’t miss any of them!
This is an insanely cool looking aircraft carrier. How on earth is this only half a thousand parts???
This is so cool! I can’t believe I never saw it before
This is a real good looking build! You put in the perfect amount of detail and made it function very well. Fantastic work on this ship!
+1This is a very cool aircraft! Seems like you could fit a lot of these on an aircraft carrier. Also I think if you painted it in some brighter colours (maybe glossy aircraft aluminium), it would look better and pop out more in the first screenshot
This looks pretty cool! Too bad it’s hard to see in the thumbnail screenshots.
This is a very well made Heinkel 111. The detailing is impeccable and it’s profile is exactly like the real thing. I will say that it does feel way too manoeuvrable but it’s looks definitely compensate for that. Overall its fantastic
I would remove some weight from the back actually. It’s still not the most stable, especially when in hard turns
This is a really nice and cool looking build! It flies well and is pretty unique too. Also, if you move the landing gear more to the middle of the plane but still behind the CoM, it will take off much better
This is a really cool vehicle! Nice build!
What’s the difference between this one and the two similar ones you posted before?
@enginer365 don’t worry about that too much. If you really want to make it, you should make the symbol quite large at first and then scale it down to the size it needs to be to sit nicely on the car. I hope this helps!
Your trains are really good. I’d love to see more of them with the level of detail you gave the ghostbusters car
This is a real excellent train. Lovely build
Whoa! This is a wonderfully made classic! Very nice work
This is a cool paint scheme for it! Nice one
@Waffloe lol good idea but it actually stands for model. They give the same M designation to all different types of weaponry and ground vehicles, but they start the number again every time it’s a new category of equipment. That’s why I can think of 8 different things called M1 and there are probably even more hahaha
+1@ChiChiWerx thanks so much for the feedback! It means a lot since your builds are of a caliber that I aspire to be able to reach. Do you have any recommendations for getting the landings to be smoother? It seems that I either have to compromise on overly soft suspension or a “bit” of a bumpy landing. Also thanks so much for the spotlight!
@Daffacomrade No problem at all my friend! There are a lot of other great SP players too! I really enjoy helping people who I see have potential
Excellent job! This looks really good and flies very well too. Nicely detailed as well
This looks cool and I love the custom control surfaces but it has no wing area! For this build you’re gonna need at least 300-400ft^2. You can hide wing parts scaling them down to 0.1,0.1,0.1 and nudge them into the wing and fuselage. I hope to see a fixed version soon!
+1This is beautifully made!
This is a good looking aircraft! Nice build!
+1@Waffloe yeah it’s just the name designation used in the UK. In the US the just put M in front of everything so it’s always confusing hahaha
@ChiChiWerx I was pretty I inspired by one of your forum posts on realistic flying aircraft when I was making this one and I was wondering what your thoughts on the characteristics of this one are. It’s definitely not perfect and the landing isn’t great but I’m pretty happy with the acceleration and turn rate of the aircraft. Am I on the right track?
This is amazing! I really love this ship and it’s nice to see it built so well on SP
+1@TheFionn up to you man! Everyone can choose what they prioritise. Personally I think you need a good mix between it and that’s what I try to do for my builds