@Lucasplaysimpleplanes well at least one of them will be, the other two won't be, the mobile friendly one is an Bellanca Cruisemaster and the two non mobile friendly ones are an ANT-20 and an 737-400combi
@Tully2001 that and I found a interesting bit of terrain issue over there, there is a gap in the side of the mountain directly below the base, if you fly into to gap you can go all the way to the top of the "hidden" ship base there and be on top of that hanger thing, so basically flying under the mountains, if you want I can take pictures of it next time, and probably to the site so possibly Andrew will see or one of the devs so it can be fixed, or should I just not say thing and keep it a secret lol
I've seen one of these in a museum once, and what was cool is you were allowed to go inside it as well, it was about the same size as your normal Md-80 it wasn't very big on the inside, but it was massive when you looked at it on the out side. (It's bigger than the concord, which was at the museum as well, here is a picture)
This looks pretty good! On a side note I actually have a track phone made by HUAWEI, and it's terrible, you hardly bump the keys and it calls everything, and all the letters are grouped in 9 to 10 keys so there is like three letters per key so making it hard to text anything in under 45m and I could go on and on about that phone
I’m just gonna take this down before it sparks political debates, I know you don’t mean no harm with posting this but it’s most likely gonna stir up stuff
@AuroraBrooke fire guns and AG 4 is what you are after, the handles in the cockpit work. (When they are armed they will not come out till on ground with throttles at 0)
@AviationLover12345 you do not need to fire back at Zero0Two2 here repeatedly and pinning the comments of the argument, it’s just promoting further fighting. If GalacticAsia says it’s fine then cool you are fine but at least have that, IF the auto credit is NOT shown please put it in the description. Now both of you guys cut it out this argument is ridiculously silly
@Zero0Two2 stop continuing the argument… if that user approved it being this way it’s fine there is no reason to continue fighting over this and again if it not it’s not on you to correct it. Report it to the mods and let us take care of it
@AviationLover12345 if you use people’s builds please do credit them especially if the auto credit was not working properly for it. This is a very goofy thing to be fighting over and a very easy thing to include in the description
@Zero0Two2 if somebody is stealing builds or breaking rules please rather than calling them out please report it using the report function so we can see it rather than it going unnoticed
This looks amazing! Awesome job on this!
+1Awesome!
+1A: A6M2 Zero
B: Boeing B-52
C: Douglas C-47
D: De havilland Dash 7
E: ECRO Ercoupe
F: Lockheed F104
G: Beechcraft G36 Bonanza
H: Heinkel He 111
I: Icon A5
J: Piper J3 Cub
K: Beechcraft King Air
L: Lavochkin La-5
M: Maule M-7
N: NAC Fieldmaster
O: Orenco B
P: Lockheed P-3 Orion
Q: Bombardier Q-400
R: Vans RV-10
S: Cirrus SR-22
T: Tupolev Tu-154
U: Lockheed U-2
V: Vickers VC10
W: Wassmer WA-51
X: Curtiss Wright XP-55
Y: Yakovlev Yak-40
Z: Zlin Z42
+1@Pianoman no problem!
+1Awesome!
+1@Lucasplaysimpleplanes well at least one of them will be, the other two won't be, the mobile friendly one is an Bellanca Cruisemaster and the two non mobile friendly ones are an ANT-20 and an 737-400combi
+1Awesome!
+1@BirdOfSteel seriously, there is no difference Hahahaha
+1An Stinson A for Alaska Star Airlines, or any airline
+1@Tully2001 I have the pictures up on the steam site
+1@Tully2001 that and I found a interesting bit of terrain issue over there, there is a gap in the side of the mountain directly below the base, if you fly into to gap you can go all the way to the top of the "hidden" ship base there and be on top of that hanger thing, so basically flying under the mountains, if you want I can take pictures of it next time, and probably to the site so possibly Andrew will see or one of the devs so it can be fixed, or should I just not say thing and keep it a secret lol
+1Well you could always add a backwards engine with the power input set to break
+1I've seen one of these in a museum once, and what was cool is you were allowed to go inside it as well, it was about the same size as your normal Md-80 it wasn't very big on the inside, but it was massive when you looked at it on the out side. (It's bigger than the concord, which was at the museum as well, here is a picture)
+1This looks pretty good! On a side note I actually have a track phone made by HUAWEI, and it's terrible, you hardly bump the keys and it calls everything, and all the letters are grouped in 9 to 10 keys so there is like three letters per key so making it hard to text anything in under 45m and I could go on and on about that phone
+1Awesome! This is probably the best An-2 that I've seen on the site so far! It flies perfectly, and it looks just as amazing!
I actually made a 1:72 scale model of it, I'm a fan of the An-2 as well
+1@A3 no problem!
+1Awesome!
+1Awesome!
+1All I see is you changed the engines and made it so the gear don't retract anymore
+1This thing is awesome!
+1Well I'm 100% ok with these changes.
+1@Sutairs it's so close! Thanks!
+15110 parts! It looks great though
+1That's what my iPad dose when I undo ANYTHING, I'll hit the undo button (and I'm not lying) I'll actually say as I hit it "Don't teleport away!"
+1@Solarisaircraft yay it's my second favorite airline
+1I should have done it like this,
+1N
O
P
R
O
B
L
M
!
@bjac0
Looks really cool!
+1The tail logo is better than would I could even think of doing.
+1I wish there was a favorite button like with the planes, because this is the funniest forum post I've seen in months.
+1@Graingy work says otherwise 🤗
@Graingy no swearing please
I’m just gonna take this down before it sparks political debates, I know you don’t mean no harm with posting this but it’s most likely gonna stir up stuff
@Mod this was a retirement project 😃
@YarisHatchback I don’t know what’s close or not
@ConnorWx yes, they are attached to “the items” map mod
@Coolman1011 I don’t but if you want to hold grudges over what was probably some small stuff, sure. Good for you 👍
@AuroraBrooke well… doing that would be a bit of a hassle with how everything was programmed so unfortunately no I can’t do that.
@AuroraBrooke fire guns and AG 4 is what you are after, the handles in the cockpit work. (When they are armed they will not come out till on ground with throttles at 0)
@Coolman1011 what
@N5 the airlines 😃
@BaconEggs it’s linked 😃
Do not make alt accounts to upvote your own posts
Do not make posts calling users out, if you have issues with users please report them rather than calling them out.
This post has been taken down. Do not make alt accounts to upvote your own posts, that is against the rules.
@CatdogAerospace I don’t have any say in that unfortunately, sorry
@AviationLover12345 you do not need to fire back at Zero0Two2 here repeatedly and pinning the comments of the argument, it’s just promoting further fighting. If GalacticAsia says it’s fine then cool you are fine but at least have that, IF the auto credit is NOT shown please put it in the description. Now both of you guys cut it out this argument is ridiculously silly
@Zero0Two2 stop continuing the argument… if that user approved it being this way it’s fine there is no reason to continue fighting over this and again if it not it’s not on you to correct it. Report it to the mods and let us take care of it
@BaconEggs car NEW
@AviationLover12345 if you use people’s builds please do credit them especially if the auto credit was not working properly for it. This is a very goofy thing to be fighting over and a very easy thing to include in the description
@Zero0Two2 if somebody is stealing builds or breaking rules please rather than calling them out please report it using the report function so we can see it rather than it going unnoticed