@doge not really, planes are less likely to run into the terrain now. It used to be that any battle over land would always end in forced crash by now it appears they have some type of detection.
@TakicraftCorporation honestly if they're not circumventing the successor system it should be welcomed more because it gives the origin maker if the plane more points.
Why people keep clicking on this of they are so "tired" of it?
Honestly if they don't want to see it anymore just ignore it. They're the one perpetuating the "drama" by getting triggered.
@TheLatentImage that's the point, I am trying to use his shame as a deterrent to ever do something like this again. I don't need him to like me for negative reinforcement to work. I am trying to show to him that what he did was stupid and other people see him as stupid for doing it. (Let's at least meet half way and call it what it is)
@TheLatentImage is negative reinforcement not constructive? You punish someone they are not likely do to do it again. I point out what he did was stupid, he is not likely to do it again.
@TheLatentImage to point out the idiocy of another user for not realizing what the purpose of the block button is and to show the spite of that user for taking this matter and public and dramatizing it.
Lol you just exposed all of them
Wait for the people that get triggered by the pig's booty
C or A
@DarthAbhinav @Rodrigo110 Cringe
@doge forced water landings have always been a thing
@Thefalloutplayr no idea how that would work technically, is interesting theoretically tho.
@PutAnUsernameHere would also be a way to do it.
@doge not really, planes are less likely to run into the terrain now. It used to be that any battle over land would always end in forced crash by now it appears they have some type of detection.
@ValtsuAircraftIndustries lol u though I was talking to you srry. I knew the period wasn't gonna be enough.
@Madpie24 it's all good
Maybe u want to delete this because the only problem was caused by ur error.
Pusher prop my guy
@ValtsuAircraftIndustries. You have to click reply for him to get notified @GlargiBoo
THE TACTICAL NUKE INBOUND
@KDS cough sense cough
Damn son this thing can actually take a missile and keep flying,
honestly if they launched a nuke at pretty much any UN nation it would get shot down pretty quickly (if it didn't miss)
Doesn't work on high physics
Thx @BogdanX
Yoke is inverted for rolling
@TakicraftCorporation just let people do what they want to do. If they want to post a bike with wings let em.
@TakicraftCorporation honestly if they're not circumventing the successor system it should be welcomed more because it gives the origin maker if the plane more points.
Everything u put as not ok is not defined as stealing according to the rules.
I block out the sun with my hand and look for it
Thx @TheOwlAce
Thx @TheOwlAce
@MrSilverWolf not necessarily, it would make building functional realistic planes easier for iOS .
Why people keep clicking on this of they are so "tired" of it?
Honestly if they don't want to see it anymore just ignore it. They're the one perpetuating the "drama" by getting triggered.
You could use two different pistons
You can use Swastikas. You obviously don't want to exterminate the Jews so use them all u want.
The chassis is too tall and rear should have slight inward slope. Otherwise spot on with the details.
Do whatever you want to do, as long as you have no political intent and it's not sexually suggestive post whatever u want to.
Thx @Jetpackturtle
@UssInvincible It would work wouldn't it?
@UssInvincible I think that doing a local 1v1 style of multiplayer would be the only way it would work on mobile
@pavthepilot boi check the date
@Rodrigo110 making the planes a single mesh would screw up the damage model, would it not?
begining of duck infestation you say?
FAKE
Ya just spent 2 mins flying around snowstone, this fake af
Can you do one with flat black lines
@TheLatentImage ah man I was having fun discussing this with you
Interesting but too bulky to be practical
Fa-18c
Control surfaces way to big
Thx @KidKromosone
@TheLatentImage that's the point, I am trying to use his shame as a deterrent to ever do something like this again. I don't need him to like me for negative reinforcement to work. I am trying to show to him that what he did was stupid and other people see him as stupid for doing it. (Let's at least meet half way and call it what it is)
@TheLatentImage is negative reinforcement not constructive? You punish someone they are not likely do to do it again. I point out what he did was stupid, he is not likely to do it again.
@TheLatentImage fight fire with fire. He wants to dramatize stuff such as that why would one not retaliate with the same force?
@TheLatentImage to point out the idiocy of another user for not realizing what the purpose of the block button is and to show the spite of that user for taking this matter and public and dramatizing it.