Correction, the f-4 does not have gull wings, a plane with a gull wing is a b-25, a plane with a inverted gull wing is a f4u corsair, the f-4 phantom has it's wingtips at a 12 degree angle so it didn't need to have it whole wing at 3 degrees, the tail was angled 23 degrees for additional stability because the vertical stabilizer had to be shortened, other then that this is cool
@sidewinder21 I wonder if he deleted the og phantom or the mods did tho, do you happen to have his none remake f-4 phantom, it was good for dogfights because of its lower part count
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't.
In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was.
@FeiWu there's a mechanical phenomenon known as physics, the f-4 countered the problem with haveing it's engines below the COM by angling them downwards (I'm doing that for mine i'm makeing), you can do the opposite with them above, not that hard, but for easy ness yes i won't advise it
@Robomo00119 what make you say that, I'm even on maneuverbility, better in radar,speed, acceleration,climb rate and armament (a Vulcan against 2 low fire rate auto cannons) but we will see
@Robomo00119 and in my opinion the f-4 could've been way more maneuverable if they shoved the wing supports through the intake and attach them to the fuselage supports, I'm surprised they didn't do that on the e or s model
So far f-4 block1 is doing good, I will make 2 more (block 2 and block 3) after block 1, I'm not gonna tell you much but block 2 will be capable of mach 2.3+ speeds
At this point it's to late for me to continue this challenge, the victor seems pretty obvious but could change and all the vehicle spots are filled
@Yourlocalhuman interesting
@GoodbyeForever thanks for liking it
@CR929thenewSPplayer pretty cool
@sidewinder21 also could you code a 50 or 60 mile range radar is possible?
Single engine f-22
Correction, the f-4 does not have gull wings, a plane with a gull wing is a b-25, a plane with a inverted gull wing is a f4u corsair, the f-4 phantom has it's wingtips at a 12 degree angle so it didn't need to have it whole wing at 3 degrees, the tail was angled 23 degrees for additional stability because the vertical stabilizer had to be shortened, other then that this is cool
+1@sidewinder21 you can just upload it as unlisted and tag me
@sidewinder21 I don't have that
You can probably put a < instead of the > to reverse it for the 57
V>730 you can put whatever number it's in mph and in tas
@sidewinder21 I wonder if he deleted the og phantom or the mods did tho, do you happen to have his none remake f-4 phantom, it was good for dogfights because of its lower part count
I watched a found and explained video about this yesterday
+2@WinsWings the first notification I've seen in a day, not very much happened today
+2I might upload my f-4 for the challenge but it might be abit difficult to land it
Cool
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't.
+1In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was.
@ShirakamiShimada but he added the tail engines and showed it on the thumbnail pictures
OH YEAH THIS EXIST
How about i say no
Bro speed ran 3,500 points and went poof
@LinusTouchTips I've seen newer games with much less updates (edit: I just realized I said upgrades
@Snargles also yeah the f-35 is ugly
@LinusTouchTips only until there done with junos major updates, so it should be this summer
Have a good break!
@crusaderwingman bro called a mig-21 a phantom
@FeiWu there's a mechanical phenomenon known as physics, the f-4 countered the problem with haveing it's engines below the COM by angling them downwards (I'm doing that for mine i'm makeing), you can do the opposite with them above, not that hard, but for easy ness yes i won't advise it
@Robomo00119 I will make a custom livery based off the Michigan air national gaurd black and yellow checkers pattern
@Robomo00119 what make you say that, I'm even on maneuverbility, better in radar,speed, acceleration,climb rate and armament (a Vulcan against 2 low fire rate auto cannons) but we will see
@Robomo00119 and in my opinion the f-4 could've been way more maneuverable if they shoved the wing supports through the intake and attach them to the fuselage supports, I'm surprised they didn't do that on the e or s model
@Robomo00119 I will put a realistic g limit on your fishbed when I dogfight it, around 8.5 gs, the same max amount on my f-4
@Robomo00119 HA I put the wing support spare through the intake so I can move and zoom
So far f-4 block1 is doing good, I will make 2 more (block 2 and block 3) after block 1, I'm not gonna tell you much but block 2 will be capable of mach 2.3+ speeds
Thanks for giving my f-4 a opponent
@Robomo00119 to be fair early f-4 phantoms didn't have guns and there pilots where taught to not use the f-4 phantoms advantages against the mig
@Graingy if you can answer correctly you are smart
@Graingy ((IAS>719)?((IAS<791)?1:0):0) what does this do
@Aarav o k I like money
@Aarav HEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE mach 1 at sea level bomber/interceptor
@Robomo00119 this despite being agile drained it's energy easily because of its interceptor role
@Robomo00119 laughs in f-86 sabre outturning a mig-15
@griges man your awesome, how did you find this out so quickly?
@griges ok thanks
@Bryan5 oh I didn't see this, I hope you get well soon!
+1I would say some weight changes would be nice (it's over it's maximum takeoff weight) but other then that this is epic
@Otana also could you draw this: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/RtY2v9/xf-103 please
@Otana once I finish my f-4, I do feel like I will draw it
@Robomo00119 NEVER, (pulls out f-15 ACTIVE and all my 5th generation fighter jet designs)
@Graingy yes
Pretty much like juno, just the pinch is a lot more custom, I wish this was in simpleplanes