I personally think we shouldn't be bothering to much on the issue. What we need is F-22A Raptors working in unison with F-35s. There is no way to get a 4th gen fighter to complete stealth or VTOL like in the case of 5th gen airframes. These few advanced aircraft are way more efficient than the legacy fighters. I would use the advantage of stealth technology and use that for the first wave of the attack, then have the older aircraft fill up the rear.
@Alienbeef0421 I feel like the Russians need to grow their economy and build more test and research airframes before they will be a major aerial threat. They have how many planes running on the same to 80s era airframe: the Su-27 and MiG-29. Not to say they weren't good, but certainly are getting outdated. The same can be said about the U.S. legacy fighters, which are being upgraded, and aesthetically ruined simultaneously.
@Alienbeef0421 I thought it was a panavia Tornado because of the swing wings. About the MiG-35 Fulcrum F, I prefer the Raptor or even the highly compromised PAK FA.
@BaconEggs we get google chromebooks at my school-our principal is a nun ( it's literally hell! ) and doesn't understand tech. That's helpful as I constantly just have nothing tri do and 2 hours left in the day so I just get on hre, log in and upvote stuff.
If you mod cockpits you can shape them like other objects and build a plane out of them. Issues with this: weight, weird corners when blocks are adjacent to each other, and they can also only take one hit when damaged. If all cockpits were primary, your aircraft could be invincible. P.S. there is a mod by Guestor (I think that is his name...right? ) who did that. its called Invincible Parts.
As a piece of advice, I would put the wing armament on the inside, or better, changethe wing to 2 pieces. If you put a structural wing on the inside and a control providing one on the outside, it Wil be very stable.
I actually see the U-7 Dravec from JC3 as well. P.S. the thing is O.P. at attacking bases and outposts when you use it right.
I actually see the U-7 Dravec from JC3 as well. P.S. the thing is O.P. at attacking bases and outposts when you use it right.
@FarrowAirlines Eh, I just use the scale tool on Fine Tuner. Especially on engines.
If you're having issues go to www.downloadmoarRAM.com and get the 256 gigabyte package.
This is hypocritical. Don't upvote! (Or at least ask) but upvote this!
@t8erh8er alright.
@t8erh8er sure, upload it as unlisted and send me the link. ( Or just copy the URL...)
Tesco McFresno. That's what you're naming it.
Tesco.
@PyroManiac xD
I support the Illuminati.
@MTBCrafter it flies much better than in real life.
Ah, the flying coffin.
GPS Bombs? Fracture missiles? Infrared and AMRAAM? Builds with the in-game SAM? SLAMRAAM?
I, personally would do this. It's nice too see other people scrapped ideas sometimes.
YF-23?
@AaltonenIndustries I prefer sleeker designs.
@EternalDarkness exactly. I think it would make the game deeper and allow more ways to do things like land at the snowstone ice base.
@JakeTheDogg please note this has 40 more parts. Please ask yourself what they are and where they are.
@Alix451 The F-14 DID enter service in around the 70s - 80s era.
I personally think we shouldn't be bothering to much on the issue. What we need is F-22A Raptors working in unison with F-35s. There is no way to get a 4th gen fighter to complete stealth or VTOL like in the case of 5th gen airframes. These few advanced aircraft are way more efficient than the legacy fighters. I would use the advantage of stealth technology and use that for the first wave of the attack, then have the older aircraft fill up the rear.
You never fail to impress, @Pilotmario
First!
@Alienbeef0421 I feel like the Russians need to grow their economy and build more test and research airframes before they will be a major aerial threat. They have how many planes running on the same to 80s era airframe: the Su-27 and MiG-29. Not to say they weren't good, but certainly are getting outdated. The same can be said about the U.S. legacy fighters, which are being upgraded, and aesthetically ruined simultaneously.
@Alienbeef0421 to put it into context, if not the Raptor it be an eagle.
@jamesPLANESii they're still cringeworthy. They look like the underside of a Kenyan barge...
@Alienbeef0421 I thought it was a panavia Tornado because of the swing wings. About the MiG-35 Fulcrum F, I prefer the Raptor or even the highly compromised PAK FA.
@jamesPLANESii really? I knew they got new radars, but body hugging fuel tanks...
@jamesPLANESii I don't like the new humps on the back/top of the fuselage. Ruins the aesthetics.
Between the mummy and Nighthawk is the eye of horus
Going from top down I got:Genie fart, lion, scarab, totum, mummy, F-117 Nighthawk, deformed monkey skull.
@BaconEggs we get google chromebooks at my school-our principal is a nun ( it's literally hell! ) and doesn't understand tech. That's helpful as I constantly just have nothing tri do and 2 hours left in the day so I just get on hre, log in and upvote stuff.
@TAplanes
@Flash0of0green Thanks! I really appreciate the help.
Wow. I like it.
@503rdAirborneSoldier I used the dash as a character to lead into the drag statistic.
Love the design.
I am not sure how to take this.
Wow. Everything is custom. Wheels, gearbox, everything. this really should be featured. This is amazing.
This looks really good.
If you mod cockpits you can shape them like other objects and build a plane out of them. Issues with this: weight, weird corners when blocks are adjacent to each other, and they can also only take one hit when damaged. If all cockpits were primary, your aircraft could be invincible. P.S. there is a mod by Guestor (I think that is his name...right? ) who did that. its called Invincible Parts.
@MaximusTheMinimus I would have done that instead.
@Thederpingmemes Thats what I mean. I don't quite remember who, but someone ( maybe BoganX? ) used the game files technique for getting the AI Bomber.
I believe you could have gone into the game files and loaded the AI Drone that way.
Su-35?
Su-30
@corsair013 thanks for the support!
As a piece of advice, I would put the wing armament on the inside, or better, changethe wing to 2 pieces. If you put a structural wing on the inside and a control providing one on the outside, it Wil be very stable.
@NativeChief1492 This was odd. It works fine now.
Enter the volcano on Hide, and you'll see a disturbing Easter egg. Hint: Never gonna-