@CjrLdy it doesn't have to be 1:1, as long as it is a factor of 1:1, such as 1:3, or 1:49, or 2:1, etc.
Part count is not a problem. As long as it is less than 10 thousand parts.
@BoganBoganTheMan the 911 Carrera 4 3,6 Coupé was introduced in 1988. So yes, but only that version. unfortunately, the pantera gt was built in 1976, so i dont think that one would be allowed. I can allow up to a couple months before 1980, but that's it, unfortunately.
it's a common (very common) misconception that spaghettification happens because one side is closer to another. This is true, and to some extent, this is what happens. But the strech and squeeze of the tendex lines produced by dense and spinning and small objects are what really cause them.
@AWESOMENESS360 also, what's interesting is that the bigger the black hole is, the less spaghettified things become, and in the case of supermassive black holes, only the biggest stars are affected at all. This is because tidal forces have everything to do with ratios and density. The sun, currently, has a gravitational pull of about 28 Gs. So the stretch and compression of the earth (if we ignore the moon) is quite large. If the sun were smaller, but the same 28 Gs, then the tendex lines of the sun become more prominant and also more abundant. They squeeze and strech with greater vigor. If the sun were bugger, but with the same density, then the tendex lines would become less prominent.
@AWESOMENESS360 youre close. These are called tidal forces, and they're the reason why tides occur on earth. They appear perpendicular to the stretch and squeezes of tendex lines.
I don't think people understand how amazing that picture is.
first of all, the reason they couldn't take a picture of a black hole closer than 55 million light years away is because anything closer and the glare of the accretion disk itself would completely faze out the rest of the shot. The scientists that partook in the photoshoot first tried it on Sagittarius A* back in like 2012, but after 4 years gave up. They described it as "trying to take a picture of a jittery child."
And they can't go farther than that either. Because most black holes further than M87, then you fall into the relm of Quasars. Quasars are black holes who's accretion disks are so hot that they outshine galaxies by a factor of a couple thousand. These black holes are called primordials, because they no longer exist; the universe is no longer violent enough to support the existance of quasars. however, when you look far away, you are looking into the past, as light travels at a constant speed. So to look farther than M87, you would have to look at black holes that outshine galaxies. So no good.
the picture itself is actually really extraordinary, especially when you realize that the glow of the black hole is all from 1 flat ring stretching across the equator of the black hole. The reason the entire black hole seems to be glowing is becuase light coming from behind the black hole being emitted off of the accretion disk is being bent around the black hole and into our eyes. That's incredible!
bruh
@Hyattorama thanksi spent a lot of time on it!
+1@CjrLdy ok, thanks!
@CjrLdy it doesn't have to be 1:1, as long as it is a factor of 1:1, such as 1:3, or 1:49, or 2:1, etc.
Part count is not a problem. As long as it is less than 10 thousand parts.
I approve of the content of this post.
nice! I'll grade it and release the final results of everyone by 5/1/19, when the challenge ends!
@Roadrunner232 SHHHHHHHHHH!!
@SGANicocchi of course the r31 gts r is allowed, it's a seventh generation skyline, that went into production in 1986.
@Destroyerz117 Yes. As NORMAL as you can get it to be. Meaning, as ACCURATE as you can get it to be to the real thing.
@BoganBoganTheMan the 911 Carrera 4 3,6 Coupé was introduced in 1988. So yes, but only that version. unfortunately, the pantera gt was built in 1976, so i dont think that one would be allowed. I can allow up to a couple months before 1980, but that's it, unfortunately.
But you can still do the 911 Carrera 4 3,6 Coupé.
@DemonSniper8 nah bro you gotta make a new one if you want to enter the F40
@WeSeekANARCHY hmmm, sure. I will make the exception.
+1@Natedog120705 np, this is actually really neat!
@RailfanEthan how DARE you
Yeah, i mean i do it
elaborate, please?
EeEeEwWw
@Jetpackturtle thank you for participating!
@randomusername the lancia Stratos Zero is from 1970. I was hoping someone would find that loophole :)
@Demonsniper8
Ewwwwwwwwwwwwww XD
@Ariathe yeah, it's like, the car had EVERYTHING, and then Agassi just blew it...
Not much of a surprise
+3Happy anniversary of violent expulsion from maternal womb!
@CRJ900Pilot damn dude congrats on platnum!
aha, i knew the earth was flat
+2also, NEVER give up an opportunity to flex.
+3@AWESOMENESS360 it was heartwarming to know that someone else is also interested in this stuff XD
@TitanIncorporated thanks dude, much appreciated!
@GeneralOliverVonBismarck lol im glad someone is happy
@AWESOMENESS360 ahh i see.
it's a common (very common) misconception that spaghettification happens because one side is closer to another. This is true, and to some extent, this is what happens. But the strech and squeeze of the tendex lines produced by dense and spinning and small objects are what really cause them.
+1@AWESOMENESS360 i wasnt finished sorry
+1@AWESOMENESS360 also, what's interesting is that the bigger the black hole is, the less spaghettified things become, and in the case of supermassive black holes, only the biggest stars are affected at all. This is because tidal forces have everything to do with ratios and density. The sun, currently, has a gravitational pull of about 28 Gs. So the stretch and compression of the earth (if we ignore the moon) is quite large. If the sun were smaller, but the same 28 Gs, then the tendex lines of the sun become more prominant and also more abundant. They squeeze and strech with greater vigor. If the sun were bugger, but with the same density, then the tendex lines would become less prominent.
+2@AWESOMENESS360 it's basically just really strong tidal forces.
@AWESOMENESS360 youre close. These are called tidal forces, and they're the reason why tides occur on earth. They appear perpendicular to the stretch and squeezes of tendex lines.
+1@tylerdeveneuxmusic im sorry you can't download XD
I don't think people understand how amazing that picture is.
first of all, the reason they couldn't take a picture of a black hole closer than 55 million light years away is because anything closer and the glare of the accretion disk itself would completely faze out the rest of the shot. The scientists that partook in the photoshoot first tried it on Sagittarius A* back in like 2012, but after 4 years gave up. They described it as "trying to take a picture of a jittery child."
And they can't go farther than that either. Because most black holes further than M87, then you fall into the relm of Quasars. Quasars are black holes who's accretion disks are so hot that they outshine galaxies by a factor of a couple thousand. These black holes are called primordials, because they no longer exist; the universe is no longer violent enough to support the existance of quasars. however, when you look far away, you are looking into the past, as light travels at a constant speed. So to look farther than M87, you would have to look at black holes that outshine galaxies. So no good.
the picture itself is actually really extraordinary, especially when you realize that the glow of the black hole is all from 1 flat ring stretching across the equator of the black hole. The reason the entire black hole seems to be glowing is becuase light coming from behind the black hole being emitted off of the accretion disk is being bent around the black hole and into our eyes. That's incredible!
+3@AWESOMENESS360 thanks, and they didnt technically strip a functional Nighthawk. They took the parts for one and made it into a car.
@AWESOMENESS360 yes. can you explain to me why exactly spaghettification happens?
@RailfanEthan thanks for the spotlight
@Strikefighter04 depressing, aint it
@RailfanEthan i wanna die but i also am laughing
@TripleAAirlinesCO yeah thanks, this took 5 months... but to be fair, for 1 week intervals at a time.
@Delphinos
@randomusername
@LancasterAce
@JamesBleriot
@GeneralOliverVonBismarck
@CrashFighter05
@Andrewtheplane
@Serkonda
@DemonSniper8
@ColonelStriker
@destroyerP
@Jetpackturtle
@jamesPLANESii
@Minecraftpoweer
@AstleyIndustries
@AWESOMENESS360
@TripleAAirlinesCO
@BoeyingOfficial