"Rule 4: If the plane has weapons, no Missles or Miniguns. Cannons are allowed."
Sorry, this entry violates the rules. I cannot review this particular entry, nor will you earn your upvote.
Tip: leave the wing tips smooth. In your planes they are either pointy or bigger than the actual wing (look at the vertical stabilizer). Also the transition to the back of the planes is too abrupt
@XxMegamonsterxX pitching is too strong for the lack of speed, the fuselage is too rough around the edges. Its way too slow, the propeller blades are too thin and small. Overral there are a issues. But still, its above average.
@Hellosss38 20 points max, 10 each criteria. Im being very rigid with the points i give for this challenge. If you want, post another plane you put a lot of effort into
@Woolf11 the game says its 11 meters long, try shrinking it to about 5 meters or so. But maintain the shape
The car itself looks good, but its WAY TOO STRETCHED. I needs to be much shorter. F1 cars from the 80s are super short
@TrislandianAlliance oh... im sorry to hear that. Sorry
Ill review it shortly
@TrislandianAlliance i know, i was making a joke.
@4pillar successor posts. It needs to be a successor post, when you take this challenge's cockpit and put in your entry.
@Gnome360 pior que é verdade lol
Sério? Lmao
B17 Flying Fortress is the correct name
@4pillar it needs to be a public successor. I cannot review if it isnt.
@P0TET0Z yeah! Alonso is kinda of an arse ngl. I dont like him
@ACEPILOT109 oooOOoo
New car engine sounds plz
T-bag
Best SP video ever!
"Rule 4: If the plane has weapons, no Missles or Miniguns. Cannons are allowed."
Sorry, this entry violates the rules. I cannot review this particular entry, nor will you earn your upvote.
@WSindustries yes of course! As long as it follows the rules.
Ill review your plane soon
@SuwongsoMotorwerks thanks!
@P0TET0Z you know, Ferrari fanboys, the guys that cry when Vettel loses a small piece of his front wing.
Nice! Btw, you aint Tifosi right?
PuRpLe BoI dRaNk ToO mUcH lEaN!
I cant help with the lights, but i can say a great use it would have: Rev lights for cars.
Its much better.
"Bring back the f** V12" -Spinbastian Vettel, Russian GP, 2019
@XxMegamonsterxX also, the props are too small and thin
@Mattangi2 questioning is fun
Tip: leave the wing tips smooth. In your planes they are either pointy or bigger than the actual wing (look at the vertical stabilizer). Also the transition to the back of the planes is too abrupt
@Supertiger i mean, you aint wrong
Edit: i had misinterpreted the your comment, sorry.
Remove the weight. You XML modded the fuel, why not mod the weight too. How can it be the "best" if it weights so much?
No. Ill start using it now.
Why is a BMW M1 towing weaponry?
@GermanSteel 2nd place so far
@XxMegamonsterxX pitching is too strong for the lack of speed, the fuselage is too rough around the edges. Its way too slow, the propeller blades are too thin and small. Overral there are a issues. But still, its above average.
@XxMegamonsterxX right above that comment
Heres your score:
Performance: 6/10
Looks:6/10
Heres your score:
Performance: 5/10
Looks: 8/10
Total: 13/20
Imma review this shortly
@XxMegamonsterxX why? Torps are WW2 tech
@LockheedLover yes, only missles and miniguns arent
@Fartspoppop yeah!
@Thefuriouschicken yeah... try to put a lot of effort into a second entry. Your score might improve.
@Thefuriouschicken its way below half. Sorry if the rating isnt good for you, im just being very strict with the ratings
Heres your score:
Performance: 3.5/10
Looks: 2/10
Total: 5.5/20
Ill review this plane when possible.
@XxMegamonsterxX if they fit the rules, its allowed
@asteroidbook345 F
b e a n . Great plane tho
@ArcturusAerospace ok. I thought it was a MS DOS like terminal lol.
@Hellosss38 20 points max, 10 each criteria. Im being very rigid with the points i give for this challenge. If you want, post another plane you put a lot of effort into