Hi, here's your score:
Looks - 10/10: Beautiful, nothing to say here other than that.
Handlng - 4/10: The car handles fine for the first 2 seconds, after that, the rear wing makes lift instead of downforce and makes the car super unpredictable, it's hard to do medium to high speed corners or flat-out corners without spinning. Also, the center of gravity feels too high
Acceleration - 7/10: Accelerates very fast, but pushes right heavily for some reason
Braking - 5/10: It's just your typical SP braking that can stop a car at full throttle faster than an F1 car could, nothing much to say here
Fun - 6/10: If these things got worked out, it wouldve had more fun tbh
Total: 32/50
A tad unrealistic and odd in some areas, but cool nonetheless
@Renzook111 No, they can't sadly, i can't run more than that on my phones.
No, lamentablemente no pueden, no puedo ejecutar más que eso en mis teléfonos.
@Renzook111 Use google translate on the whole description, everything you need to know is there. The way you'll be judged is detailed in the "Points" section.
Use el traductor de Google en toda la descripción, todo lo que necesita saber está allí. La forma en que serás juzgado se detalla en la sección "Points".
@BellKitsu uh, me talking about railguns is a joke, because more often than not, put an Ace Combat inspired weapon on my planes. And no im prolly not gonna run out of creativity, i hope
@BellKitsu yeah, true, i agree.
Also i said idk how im gold as a joke, i know what happened for me to have my rank, i just dont get how i got here, ya dig?
Current project i'm working on. All displays and the HUD were stolen programming from the wasp and the parachute delay was programming i found in a forum post and modified.
@thewrecker03 you couldve just put the link here and tagged me lmao, also, i dont see it, cuz its unlisted. Only your or people with the link see unlisted posts.
Here's your score:
Looks: 9/15 - It looks kinda small, the steering wheel is tiny, it has some features that dont fit with the era (rear end of the sidepods), has very noticeble texture clipping, and the "suspension" arms are bulky.
Realism: 5/15 - Too much grip, accelerates too fast, is too easy to flip and has no suspension, wheel or shock based. The last part is a cardinal sin.
Handling: 6/15 - Same complaints as before.
Personal Rating: 2.5/5 - Didnt like it much.
Total: 22.5/50
@thewrecker03 i used the formula the game gives me (RotorRPM/600), i just replaced RotorRPM with the Engine's Variable Output i set for RPM (EngineRPM, just click the output thingy and write EngineRPM in the name section for the RPM variable) and decreased the multiplier in the gauge until it worked.
@CheckOneTwo no they dont need them. If you wanna add them, go for it
Hi, here's your score:
Looks - 10/10: Beautiful, nothing to say here other than that.
Handlng - 4/10: The car handles fine for the first 2 seconds, after that, the rear wing makes lift instead of downforce and makes the car super unpredictable, it's hard to do medium to high speed corners or flat-out corners without spinning. Also, the center of gravity feels too high
Acceleration - 7/10: Accelerates very fast, but pushes right heavily for some reason
Braking - 5/10: It's just your typical SP braking that can stop a car at full throttle faster than an F1 car could, nothing much to say here
Fun - 6/10: If these things got worked out, it wouldve had more fun tbh
Total: 32/50
A tad unrealistic and odd in some areas, but cool nonetheless
Cool i guess, idfk lmao
@Renzook111 No, they can't sadly, i can't run more than that on my phones.
No, lamentablemente no pueden, no puedo ejecutar más que eso en mis teléfonos.
@Renzook111 thanks
@pura well, pure turing cars id say no.
@pura also yes
@LotusCarsSub yes they are
Hey everyone, i'm a dumbass, i forgot to write the rewards. Well, now it's written and you all can check, sorry for my stupidity
@Renzook111 Use google translate on the whole description, everything you need to know is there. The way you'll be judged is detailed in the "Points" section.
Use el traductor de Google en toda la descripción, todo lo que necesita saber está allí. La forma en que serás juzgado se detalla en la sección "Points".
@DragoransEscarti any GT class except GTP pretty much. That includes JGTC, Brazilian Stock Cars, V8 Supercars and stuff like that too
Very insightful
T
@goboygo1 it is really dumb
very cartoony looking, but i like it
Quite good ngl. Tag me when you finish it please, im a sucker for F5s lmao
@WhyBreadSoFattning maybe its either a new thing with SP or Gravatar
Share screenshots of the actual plane and not just the cockpit
Why take my chassis for this? Thats pretty dumb
I knew i wasnt gonna come close to winning, but it was great fun making my F1 car for the challenge
@BsetAutomotiveFan2022 maps can work on android tho
@Nebyu you sure it doesnt? It should, since its a folder. Odd
@TheFlyingWolfYT i was using KSP logic, so like, CoM close to CoL. Didnt translate well to SP lmao. Barely pitch up, spin 20 times
Thats why you look up available platforms first
This is honestly great!
It's out!
Click Here!
Tags: @RYZ3NCHR1ST3NS3N @BeastHunter
@ProjectR least i can do as a thank you
@BellKitsu im not great with getting jokes lmao, sorry
@BellKitsu uh, me talking about railguns is a joke, because more often than not, put an Ace Combat inspired weapon on my planes. And no im prolly not gonna run out of creativity, i hope
@BellKitsu yeah, true, i agree.
Also i said idk how im gold as a joke, i know what happened for me to have my rank, i just dont get how i got here, ya dig?
Im pretty sure the wasp has programming for that. See if you can reverse engineer that
@pura roger that
Finnally gave everyone their rewards! Sorry for taking too long, busy irl.
Current project i'm working on. All displays and the HUD were stolen programming from the wasp and the parachute delay was programming i found in a forum post and modified.
@LotusCarsSub yeah, thats exactly why i couldnt put it there. You shouldnt have deleted it tbh
@LieutenantSOT
@21212123
@WingsOfSteel
@Winterro
@Arsenia
@pura
@CheckOneTwo
@SimplePlanemaker12654
@AWESOMENESS360 a kazoo that may or may not be made of magnesium
@KfcGaming thanks!
@thewrecker03 thanks, imma check it out
It's out!
Click here!
Tags: @DJ2keroni @Ouroboros @LotusCarsSub
@thewrecker03 i meam the link to the post, not your account.
@thewrecker03 you couldve just put the link here and tagged me lmao, also, i dont see it, cuz its unlisted. Only your or people with the link see unlisted posts.
@thewrecker03 can you give me the unlisted link?
Here's your score:
Looks: 9/15 - It looks kinda small, the steering wheel is tiny, it has some features that dont fit with the era (rear end of the sidepods), has very noticeble texture clipping, and the "suspension" arms are bulky.
Realism: 5/15 - Too much grip, accelerates too fast, is too easy to flip and has no suspension, wheel or shock based. The last part is a cardinal sin.
Handling: 6/15 - Same complaints as before.
Personal Rating: 2.5/5 - Didnt like it much.
Total: 22.5/50
@thewrecker03 alright fam, good luck
@thewrecker03 i used the formula the game gives me (
RotorRPM/600), i just replacedRotorRPMwith the Engine's Variable Output i set for RPM (EngineRPM, just click the output thingy and write EngineRPM in the name section for the RPM variable) and decreased the multiplier in the gauge until it worked.