@V no, thats more of a prototype than a GT Car. If you need an idea on what to make, here's a couple classes i recommend looking into:
DTM (pre 2021 and post 2021)
IMSA GTLM and GTD
WEC GTLM
World Sportscars Championship GT3, GT2 and GT1
Japanese Super GT
Brazilian Stock Cars
@RankStarfish201 this is the last thing i posted, it uses the RPM gauge. Im currently making one using an altimiter too. The engine is exposed, so you can easily select it
@PapaKernels well, got a review out of it. Thanks for adressing the performance cost thing, i thought the game didn't change how it calculated how well a build would run.
Anyways, here's your score:
Looks - 10/10: Wonderful!
Handling - 9/10: Really like how it handles.
Braking: 10/10: The brake torque tunning feels great, i think it's the first car so far that actually has it tuned.
Acceleration - 8/10: Wish it was a tenth of a second slower, that's pretty much it.
Fun - 8/10: It's great and it's cool my phone can run it, too bad it doesn't run well, i get plenty of stuttering on med. physics even with all graphics options at the lowest. A11 problems.
Total: 45/50
I extended the deadline to April 1st Clicky
P.s: small rule update to account for performance cost. Thanks to PapaKernels for pointing that out to me, making it a default thing for future challenges
P.s.s: Rule update again
Heres your score:
Looks - 1/10: It is UGLY, no offense
Handling - 7/10: It surprisingly handles well, great suspension, but why dirt tyres and no form of downforce?
Braking - 5/10: Standard SP brakes.
Acceleration - 5/10: Standard SP acceleration pretty much
Fun- 2/10: Aside from the suspension, it sucks, again, no offense.
Total: 20/50
Hi, here's your score:
Looks - 10/10: Beautiful, nothing to say here other than that.
Handlng - 4/10: The car handles fine for the first 2 seconds, after that, the rear wing makes lift instead of downforce and makes the car super unpredictable, it's hard to do medium to high speed corners or flat-out corners without spinning. Also, the center of gravity feels too high
Acceleration - 7/10: Accelerates very fast, but pushes right heavily for some reason
Braking - 5/10: It's just your typical SP braking that can stop a car at full throttle faster than an F1 car could, nothing much to say here
Fun - 6/10: If these things got worked out, it wouldve had more fun tbh
Total: 32/50
A tad unrealistic and odd in some areas, but cool nonetheless
@Nerfaddict oh thanks, that could be useful
This is actually an F1 car from 2009 to 2013
@Dragorans kkkkkkkk
@Dragorans obg!
To pensando em fazer algo tipo um MG Metro de Grupo B no futuro msm.
@V no, thats more of a prototype than a GT Car. If you need an idea on what to make, here's a couple classes i recommend looking into:
DTM (pre 2021 and post 2021)
IMSA GTLM and GTD
WEC GTLM
World Sportscars Championship GT3, GT2 and GT1
Japanese Super GT
Brazilian Stock Cars
@V sure
It's posted
Clicky
It's posted!
Clicky
Tags:
@Dragorans
@TheFlyingHusky
@BeastHunter
@IceCraftGaming
T
Wheelbase is super short, but cool
@Dragorans vlw!
This was filmed on low physics because it has so many part's it lags the game at medium physics lmao. I also drove terribly.
T to be Tagged!
Link to forum post
@Vovslav well that sucks. I hope youre ok out there
Im actually pretty sure the pilot got it to poland, i may be wrong tho
@RankStarfish201 this is the last thing i posted, it uses the RPM gauge. Im currently making one using an altimiter too. The engine is exposed, so you can easily select it
@MintLynx ah, that sucks
Yeah, its a pain. Everytime i make a car, having to change the camber or toe everytime i mirror a wheel is awful
@Dragorans wierd, it wasnt for me, and i was constantly testing it
And thanks!
//
Estranho, n tava rolando cmg, e tava testando mt
E vlw!
Out now!
Clicky
Tags:
@BeastHunter
@Bryan5
@Whattodoeh
@Ouroboros
@Shimamurahougetsu
@LotusCarsSub
@X99STRIKER
@Dragorans
@AngularMomentum
@Almostbutnotquite
@UltraLight this car didnt age well with me lmao
This stuff aint funny anymore
@UByx eu sei, mas era só usar o finetuner no eixo de largura.
Cool, but thats a damn narrow wheelbase
This is a certified bruh moment
Amazon Natives for the very most part, are not like this
Cool, i guess
T
2018 livery is the best Ferrari livery to me
@EchoWhiskey11 go for it
You flipped the hyperlink thing, its []_()
@PapaKernels well, got a review out of it. Thanks for adressing the performance cost thing, i thought the game didn't change how it calculated how well a build would run.
Anyways, here's your score:
Looks - 10/10: Wonderful!
Handling - 9/10: Really like how it handles.
Braking: 10/10: The brake torque tunning feels great, i think it's the first car so far that actually has it tuned.
Acceleration - 8/10: Wish it was a tenth of a second slower, that's pretty much it.
Fun - 8/10: It's great and it's cool my phone can run it, too bad it doesn't run well, i get plenty of stuttering on med. physics even with all graphics options at the lowest. A11 problems.
Total: 45/50
@PapaKernels has too many parts, max is 275. But, if you want, you can simplify it for the challenge
I extended the deadline to April 1st
Clicky
P.s: small rule update to account for performance cost. Thanks to PapaKernels for pointing that out to me, making it a default thing for future challenges
P.s.s: Rule update again
Hot
How can someone make a successor of a forum?....
Who?
Really, all we actually need rn, at least imo, is optimization, at least a laser weapon, tank tracks and a bombsight part, plus your typical bug fix
@SCPCalebkid enabling them isnt gonna work unless you manage to mess with Unity itself a lot.
@Nekopankake3222 then just use judgement when downloading stuff. Do some research on a site if you need to
@ZeroWithSlashedO wheel physics on their own dont really suck, but to get good wheel grip and/or nice properties, they need some setting up.
@DragoransEscarti well, alright, id love to see more cars to review!
Heres your score:
Looks - 1/10: It is UGLY, no offense
Handling - 7/10: It surprisingly handles well, great suspension, but why dirt tyres and no form of downforce?
Braking - 5/10: Standard SP brakes.
Acceleration - 5/10: Standard SP acceleration pretty much
Fun- 2/10: Aside from the suspension, it sucks, again, no offense.
Total: 20/50
@THEREALLYTHEVILAGERbp you can use an old car, its in the rules section
@DCLDCL yes you can. It says that in the opening paragraph lol
@CheckOneTwo no they dont need them. If you wanna add them, go for it
Hi, here's your score:
Looks - 10/10: Beautiful, nothing to say here other than that.
Handlng - 4/10: The car handles fine for the first 2 seconds, after that, the rear wing makes lift instead of downforce and makes the car super unpredictable, it's hard to do medium to high speed corners or flat-out corners without spinning. Also, the center of gravity feels too high
Acceleration - 7/10: Accelerates very fast, but pushes right heavily for some reason
Braking - 5/10: It's just your typical SP braking that can stop a car at full throttle faster than an F1 car could, nothing much to say here
Fun - 6/10: If these things got worked out, it wouldve had more fun tbh
Total: 32/50
A tad unrealistic and odd in some areas, but cool nonetheless