@Graingy unlike you I have the ability to separate my opinions of the person and my opinions on the build, plus, it’s the best one of the site, but I found it so it’s all good
@Agent1Scope the reason why you “stole” it, is because you failed to give credit, not anything else, so while the builds not out yet, so you technically didn’t, but when someone finds the same plane and you didn’t give credit, they’re going to think you stole it
@DeeganishCountryball yes, you calculate it by seeing how many 90 degree angles there are (your method wouldn’t have that) if you have S-ducts (this would mean that you would have to connect the engine to the inlet) and adding RAM paint, however you could still come up with something that’s not stealth, for example your AW-10A Flying Fox, which is by no means stealth, although it lacks 90 degree angles, it’s not deflective enough, and while I’m not going full in-depth on how the RCS should be calculated, I suggest you learn more about stealth
@Graingy eh, I don’t care, your problem is that you get yourself involved in the drama
@Graingy MDA does still exist, but there’s been no reason to fight, although we’re gearing up for M-War II, also I keep forgetting to change that
@Graingy does it matter, visibility is still internet clout which means nothing
Memes aside it’s nice
+1You turn a manned plane into a drone, I turn a drone into a manned plane, we are not the same
@Graingy I was saying R.I.P about you
@Graingy except it’s not that serious, people will be people, and it’s just internet points or internet clout
Pleas tell me your not a native English speaker
+1@Graingy unlike you I have the ability to separate my opinions of the person and my opinions on the build, plus, it’s the best one of the site, but I found it so it’s all good
Nice
@overlordprime
Signed
@Graingy I find it amusing but I’m mildly annoyed since he built good stuff (and I forgot to save his B-17 gunship)
+1R.I.P
Nice
found this while looking for the P6M seamaster
+1@Graingy yep
@Graingy better yet, it’s great
@Graingy it’s fine
@SPsidearm I don't know
NOOOOOOOOOOOO
+3NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
I'VE HAD ENOUGH OF MISIDE, GET OUTTTTTT
@TheUltimatePlaneLover ah
Reminds when I saw a Me-262 as a prop
+1@SlGMA k
Cursed A-5
+1it happens, it has to do with presentation, get someone else to take your thumbnails like @restlessgalaxies
T
ONE OF US, ONE OF US, ONE OF US,
+3-Supreme Dorian
As someone from NJ l like the spirit of the Atlantic City
@SlGMA bruh
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover ah
no AT?
EEEEEEEEE
+1@SlGMA when scoring
+1@Pnut oh same, I just started using it too
+1krita
T
T
Real
@Agent1Scope the reason why you “stole” it, is because you failed to give credit, not anything else, so while the builds not out yet, so you technically didn’t, but when someone finds the same plane and you didn’t give credit, they’re going to think you stole it
YY
@TheUltimatePlaneLover whaT legal reasons
@DeeganishCountryball ye, he’s great
@DeeganishCountryball watch this that's what helped me to understand stealth better
Also props aren’t any more stealthy than jets
@DeeganishCountryball also please stop capitalizing every word
@DeeganishCountryball yes, you calculate it by seeing how many 90 degree angles there are (your method wouldn’t have that) if you have S-ducts (this would mean that you would have to connect the engine to the inlet) and adding RAM paint, however you could still come up with something that’s not stealth, for example your AW-10A Flying Fox, which is by no means stealth, although it lacks 90 degree angles, it’s not deflective enough, and while I’m not going full in-depth on how the RCS should be calculated, I suggest you learn more about stealth
That’s not a good method of calculating stealth
Hey, I started there too, just persevere and you’ll get recognition
dies of death from the title