Coooool, but the stall speed is like 4 miles per hour below the takeoff speed. Do you mind if I make a new version that's faster?
Edit: if you activate the modded engine like you're supposed to, it works right. And the yaw actually works, unlike most airplanes I've tried. This is easily my Favorite plane.
@WalrusAircraft Furthermore, I went through and counted all my four-star reviews. I had forty. Then I went on to count all of my reviews so I could get a picture of what percentage of my reviews were four-stars. I gave up at 400. Less than 10% of my reviews are four stars. I do hand out 4-star reviews with a description of a problem, but not quite as often as you make it out to be.
@WalrusAircraft I try to come up with a solution to the problem, but I usually can't, so I don't provide one. I can't fly this plane for more than a minute without the wings breaking off. I used to not rate planes that I had problems with or give them five stars and tell them the problem, bu I am tired of keeping all my ratings sanitised and sugary. I have decided to say what I think about the planes. One 4-star rating out of 9 isn't going to hurt anything a whole lot anyway. I sometimes post fixed planes if you would look through my older ones, but big ones with structural problems are not my forte. If I knew how to fix it, I would, but even if I uploaded a fix I still would have given this four stars. No one else has had this problem and said anything, so I'm not sure it would be worth my time to upload it. And, you are right about it being my decision how to rate planes. Why don't you go rag on the people who give out one-star reviews just because a plane is a successor, no matter what's changed, instead of complaining about me giving four-star reviews because of issues that make a plane a four-star plane in my opinion. Or how about those people who give poor reviews and don't even say what their problem with it is. The community would appreciate them more if they did what I do as opposed to what they do already. If I know of a solution, I'll say it, but sometimes I do not care enough about the plane or just don't have enough time to search for a solution to a problem.
The reason you get negative feedback is because you don't give credit to the person who put hours into making the plane that you re sprayed in fifteen minutes.
@jheffernan I wasn't really trying to make it have a certain speed, but it seemed just right, so I didn't change it. Thanks for the rating!
You still didn't remove the cockpit.
The who?
@WalrusAircraft I used your propellor here.
*on the Garrison
Post a video on Kamcord and comment not he Garrison with the link.
@PhysicsBender Hey, it's different. It doesn't have the protective wall at the back and I added stabilisers.
@Spikerya a thousand...
@geekr It needs a number, like F-?
You are a god.
Cool, but you should have left off the VTOL and used modded large engines.
You people...
I'm no good at these, but this one is doable.
@geekr I did download it...
I love it, but it needs a name...
What is it?
But seriously, I can stop posting stuff for less than 24 hours and have 80 notifications and people legitimately concerned about me.
Coooool, but the stall speed is like 4 miles per hour below the takeoff speed. Do you mind if I make a new version that's faster? Edit: if you activate the modded engine like you're supposed to, it works right. And the yaw actually works, unlike most airplanes I've tried. This is easily my Favorite plane.
Pretty good. Have you made an F-86 Sabre?
@Spikerya five or six hundred...
@HadesPluto Thanks
This sounds like a good idea.
Still hard, but better than the last one. This one is actually possible to defeat.
When you said it can land on any of my naval carriers, did you mean my tiny ones, like the USS Garrison?
These are pretty cool
Cool
@SpiritusRaptor Oh, I didn't see that part. Whoops.
So much for "Don't rate"
The Front-top-side view gives it away.
@bjac0 yeah, I know.
@bjac0 ...it was a repaint contest...
@WalrusAircraft Thanks for the suggestion! I added it to the description.
I changed your rating.
Yeah. I hate changing the settings all the time. It got rid of lag, so I left it.
Congrats
This looks evil...
@Spikerya Or two hundred...
@Spikerya More like welcome to the Internet lol
Or three times...
@Garuda1 as you said in one of your other comments to me, your ratings are all over the place recently and so I wasn't sure.
I found out that it simulates a torpedo hit.
This has been up for two days and is already the 14th highest rated plane of all time. Congratulations!
@WalrusAircraft Thanks. I just posted it a few minutes ago.
@WalrusAircraft Furthermore, I went through and counted all my four-star reviews. I had forty. Then I went on to count all of my reviews so I could get a picture of what percentage of my reviews were four-stars. I gave up at 400. Less than 10% of my reviews are four stars. I do hand out 4-star reviews with a description of a problem, but not quite as often as you make it out to be.
What exactly is detatcher one meant to do?
Once or twice...
Okay
Wow, that comment turned out longer than I thought it would.
@WalrusAircraft I try to come up with a solution to the problem, but I usually can't, so I don't provide one. I can't fly this plane for more than a minute without the wings breaking off. I used to not rate planes that I had problems with or give them five stars and tell them the problem, bu I am tired of keeping all my ratings sanitised and sugary. I have decided to say what I think about the planes. One 4-star rating out of 9 isn't going to hurt anything a whole lot anyway. I sometimes post fixed planes if you would look through my older ones, but big ones with structural problems are not my forte. If I knew how to fix it, I would, but even if I uploaded a fix I still would have given this four stars. No one else has had this problem and said anything, so I'm not sure it would be worth my time to upload it. And, you are right about it being my decision how to rate planes. Why don't you go rag on the people who give out one-star reviews just because a plane is a successor, no matter what's changed, instead of complaining about me giving four-star reviews because of issues that make a plane a four-star plane in my opinion. Or how about those people who give poor reviews and don't even say what their problem with it is. The community would appreciate them more if they did what I do as opposed to what they do already. If I know of a solution, I'll say it, but sometimes I do not care enough about the plane or just don't have enough time to search for a solution to a problem.
The reason you get negative feedback is because you don't give credit to the person who put hours into making the plane that you re sprayed in fifteen minutes.