134k L1nus Comments

  • Grumman F-14 A Tomcat 1.4 years ago

    yesterday was it's 50th anniversary because iran still uses them

  • Grumman F-14 A Tomcat 1.4 years ago

    @NordicAerospace 1974 September 22nd was when she went into service as well, yes i did do this intentionally

  • Grumman F-14 A Tomcat 1.4 years ago

    @AjRenegade it's intended to be flown from the Pilot cockpit, there is no RIO functionality as i made sure all controls can be used in the front cockpit

  • 100K!!!!!!!! 1.4 years ago

    One of Us, One of Us

    +2
  • Are You Serious Right Now!? 1.4 years ago

    @AWESOMENESS360 Have you seen the Twitter bot groups? it's whole network of bots that actually respond to each other to create fake engagement with Ai made identities of people that don't exist.

    +2
  • Grumman F-14 A Tomcat 1.4 years ago

    @CaptainBrayden thanks mate

  • Are You Serious Right Now!? 1.4 years ago

    If you really want to feel scared look up the dead internet theory

    +8
  • Tupolev Tu-4 Superfortresski “Bull” 1.4 years ago

    is that the Gulag Express?

  • Grumman F-14 A (Bad Cat #34) 1.4 years ago

    @Stephen22 ngl i might update it and add 2 more parts just to be on the nose about it

  • Grumman F-14 A Tomcat 1.4 years ago

    @Timplanes The F-14 was designed to break it's wings for you lol

    +3
  • Grumman F-14 A Tomcat 1.4 years ago

    Celebrate 50 years of service from the F-14 Tomcat 1974-2024

  • T 1.4 years ago

    do people not know how to screenshot on desktop? also that set up is mad dusty

  • Grumman F-14 A Tomcat 1.4 years ago

    @TheAerospacecraftNerd77 FunFact: TF-30s made F-14 As have better TTWR than An F-14 D. The Top Speed record was set on an A model clean

    +1
  • Grumman F-14 A (Bad Cat #34) 1.4 years ago

    @SPsidearm 4 dilla

  • Grumman F-14 A (Bad Cat #34) 1.4 years ago

    @Rjenteissussy lol

    +1
  • Grumman F-14 A Tomcat 1.4 years ago

    @Christiant2 Thank you i spent about a year and a half working on this design

    +1
  • Grumman F-14 A Tomcat 1.4 years ago

    @BYardley

    +1
  • Grumman F-14 A Tomcat 1.4 years ago

    @TatsuTheOtaku
    @TheNewSPplayer
    @CaptainNoble

  • Grumman F-14 A Tomcat 1.4 years ago

    @IceCraftGaming
    @TemporaryReplacement
    @TheUltimatePlaneLover

    +1
  • Grumman F-14 A Tomcat 1.4 years ago

    @Randomplayer
    @TheMouse
    @Nj364

  • Grumman F-14 A Tomcat 1.4 years ago

    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
    @Marulk
    @crazyplaness

  • Grumman F-14 A (Bad Cat #34) 1.4 years ago

    @BYardley

    +1
  • Grumman F-14 A (Bad Cat #34) 1.4 years ago

    @TatsuTheOtaku
    @TheNewSPplayer
    @CaptainNoble

  • Grumman F-14 A (Bad Cat #34) 1.4 years ago

    @IceCraftGaming
    @TemporaryReplacement
    @TheUltimatePlaneLover

    +1
  • Grumman F-14 A (Bad Cat #34) 1.4 years ago

    @Randomplayer
    @TheMouse
    @Nj364

  • Grumman F-14 A (Bad Cat #34) 1.4 years ago

    @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
    @Marulk
    @crazyplaness

  • MiG-29SM 1.4 years ago

    What's up with the front gear?

    +1
  • Antonov an_124_100 UR-82260 1.4 years ago

    @Aga2003 accelerates littel to fast, like 200 knots in a few seconds. Handling is what you'd expect from this kinda plane

  • Antonov an_124_100 UR-82260 1.4 years ago

    Simple way to put it is if people like it. People download

  • Antonov an_124_100 UR-82260 1.4 years ago

    @Aga2003 oh so you are trying to hide it from people so get more downloads.

  • Antonov an_124_100 UR-82260 1.4 years ago

    Even the the performance cost is exactly the same regardless

  • Antonov an_124_100 UR-82260 1.4 years ago

    @Graingy bro thinks disconnecting a cockpit from a 2000 part build compresses the file to 1 part and makes it run better

  • Antonov an_124_100 UR-82260 1.4 years ago

    @Graingy get a load of this guy

  • Antonov an_124_100 UR-82260 1.4 years ago

    Also why are you still going on about how I claimed its stolen when we've established it isnt, you're just dumb to think that disconnecting a cockpit would actually compress the file size, I can ask literally anyone else rn and they would tell you, you are wrong

  • XH-100 1.4 years ago

    Love it man

    +1
  • Antonov an_124_100 UR-82260 1.4 years ago

    That's just really sad honestly

  • Antonov an_124_100 UR-82260 1.4 years ago

    @Aga2003 I play mobile too lol, so what you're saying is you're intentionally hiding your part count of your builds to get more downloads, ask literally anyone else in this community and they will tell you that this doesn't work that way

  • F-15A (WIP 3) 1.4 years ago

    That looks really good, Tag me when it comes out

  • Antonov an_124_100 UR-82260 1.4 years ago

    The reason you think this works is because it voids the check that the website makes for higher part creations, so when you disconnect the cockpit this warning for high part creations will not show because you made the website think it's only one part, I'm sure if you post this normally with the cockpit connected that the website will flag this as high part

  • Antonov an_124_100 UR-82260 1.4 years ago

    my proof here, besides that if this really was a feature compress part counts. why aren't other people doing it. surely in the 10 years this game has existed someone would have already made awareness to this, i can also bet i've been playing this game longer than you

  • Antonov an_124_100 UR-82260 1.4 years ago

    This build is still 2000 parts, the 1 part thing is just because the cockpit isn't connected to the build, the part count number is in relation to how many parts are connected to the cockpit, not how many parts are in the creation it's self. i can guarantee most mobile users can't run this because of it's performance cost. the performance cost is what you should focus on instead of the part count

  • Antonov an_124_100 UR-82260 1.4 years ago

    Part count doesn't determine how a build runs, performance cost does

    +1
  • Antonov an_124_100 UR-82260 1.4 years ago

    @Aga2003 you realize the build is still at 2000 parts right? Disconnecting the cockpit does absolutely nothing. So in fact most people can't run this lmao

    +1
  • Antonov an_124_100 UR-82260 1.4 years ago

    @MyBelovedHoshimachi also can you show me how to get banned as many times as you?

  • Antonov an_124_100 UR-82260 1.4 years ago

    @MyBelovedHoshimachi so i don't know if you know about this trick or not but you can remove a cockpit from an already posted build and save the entire build as a sub assembly. and then reupload it, the 1 part listed below looks really sus and is why i thought it's potentially stolen

  • 5 Sexy Fictional Supercars #1 1.4 years ago

    that's fine to like fictional cars @MasterPlanes101. i'm just saying most of them are just based on Ferrari's/Lamborghini's and they're only fictional to avoid copyright and are not fictional for reason of originality, especially GTA 5 online cars

  • I'm different... 1.4 years ago

    @Graingy Fat turret

    +1
  • I'm different... 1.4 years ago

    Makes me want to make fat turret

    +7
  • Antonov an_124_100 UR-82260 1.4 years ago

    why do i feel like this was stolen

    +2