17.8k Kangy Comments

  • MiG-29 | Ghost of Kyiv | Update 3.3 years ago

    g host of kevin??!/1?!11

    +1
  • F/A-18 Super Hornet RAAF 3.4 years ago

    First off
    Please change the flight model - dcs manuals give a good reference point.
    Also I didn’t make the roundel you ended up using SR’s roundel instead haha 😅

    +1
  • Its a black widow! [Teaser] 3.4 years ago

    That would be a really cool livery to implement alongside it!
    I reckon you make both and link one in the description. @KipSqueaks

    +1
  • Electric Scooter Testing 3.4 years ago

    wait you're chillybacon?
    bruh how'd i not realise you changed your pfp and name lol

    +1
  • Embraer EMB-120 Brasilia 3.4 years ago

    I like the cockpit :)

    +1
  • The ‘German’ Planes are here again 3.4 years ago

    lol it seems like all the kids who did the andrewism stuff are peed off over german corsair stuff now loll

    +1
  • [TEASER] F/A-18 Super Hornet RAAF 3.4 years ago

    @DameTheMobileFriendly Also I suggest you use my roundels, they're better than SR's roundels and only cost a few extra parts

    +1
  • [TEASER] F/A-18 Super Hornet RAAF 3.4 years ago

    @DameTheMobileFriendly Wait I remember now, that's the Fighting First Squadron (No 1 SQN)

    +1
  • [TEASER] F/A-18 Super Hornet RAAF 3.4 years ago

    omg the roundels are the wrong way around
    other than that massive error lookin good
    which squadron again? i think it's 3 sqn

    +1
  • G.91 R3 3.4 years ago

    No wukkas mate! @ZWLenning

    +1
  • F-15 3.4 years ago

    holy crap that looks nuts
    please make a replica cockpit, intakes that move n all - this has sooo much potential
    also if needed i can work on the flight model :))

    +1
  • RAAF Roundel 3.4 years ago

    No wukkas! No need to credit :) @DameTheMobileFriendly

    +1
  • Ukraine flag 3.4 years ago

    @jamesPLANESii wuld be sad for ukrain ngl lie

    +1
  • 22/02/2022 is the coolest date of all time 3.4 years ago

    @Destroyerz117 it's twosday my dudes
    sounds like one of those cool 'my little dark age' videos lol

    +1
  • Almost blind carrier landing 3.4 years ago

    Sounds awesome man!
    I do agree it should be pretty easy to recalibrate given it’s just a few trig equations, it shouldn’t be too tough to find what you need.
    Keep at it man, your FT skills are an inspiration! @GuyFolk

    +1
  • Su 30 Flanker-C 3.4 years ago

    One of the best looking flankers on the site imo
    But honestly the flight model holds this back a lot.

    +1
  • Messerschmitt Bf-110 G4 3.4 years ago

    @TonnkatuTonnkatuThePig i honestly doubt youtube would do much on another monitor
    windows is good at handling multiple displays from past experience
    heat drain would be (my guess) the root cause to the problem - i presume your components are clocking themselves to not overheat

    +1
  • Messerschmitt Bf-110 G4 3.4 years ago

    @TonnkatuTonnkatuThePig geez that's rough
    i'll presume you have an i5 - which should be more than plenty too
    is it just simpleplanes that runs poorly?

    +1
  • [TEASER] Model's waterslide decal. 3.4 years ago

    @GuyFolk yeah exactly
    it's a win loss sorta thing

    +1
  • (Closed) Modern Defence Vehicle Challenge 3.4 years ago

    Just tag a moderator and get its successorship code changed to PfVV1n @IceCraftGaming

    +1
  • Results Of The WWI Challenge 3.4 years ago

    good judging, glad that you noted the stability of the aircraft too
    most wwi aircraft were like flying a twig with wings - they'd either fly or fall real well

    +1
  • TEASER (FIGHTER JET) 3.4 years ago

    waste of a forum ngl

    +1
  • I need some camo assistance. 3.4 years ago

    Look at some of RJ’s techniques. They’re really good

    +1
  • Jundroo-City 3.4 years ago

    the tags seem to be targeted
    but innocent until guilty rule applies as always
    so tell me where i 'marked the old mod'

    +1
  • McDonnell Douglas F-4E Phantom II 3.4 years ago

    pha @Phox

    +1
  • McDonnell Douglas F-4E Phantom II 3.4 years ago

    😏 I see what occurred there haha @Phox

    +1
  • McDonnell Douglas F-4E Phantom II 3.4 years ago

    I understand that, but even still
    The cockpit is next to nothing, and the flight model has no AoA whatsoever. @Phox

    +1
  • McDonnell Douglas F-4E Phantom II 3.4 years ago

    Pheels half done in my opinion - flight model is like a graph, and the fact that the tail hook doesn’t even work astonishes me.

    +1
  • T-2 CCV teaser - basic tests 3.4 years ago

    @ALRX amazing man, keep up the hard yakka :)

    +1
  • Curated 3.4 years ago

    it works well in vr

    +1
  • Paint schemes menu 3.5 years ago

    would be pretty nice and easy to implement by the sounds of it

    +1
  • VR M16A3 Simulator 3.5 years ago

    not funni jalta @kyomunosekai

    +1
  • (Closed) Modern Defence Vehicle Challenge 3.5 years ago

    @Viper_Z3R0 Cool
    Much appreciated.

    +1
  • Class 3.5 years ago

    Literal goldfish @jamesPLANESii

    +1
  • Ilyushin IL-76TD 3.5 years ago

    woah...

    +1
  • TYM TRACTOR T264 3.5 years ago

    It is criminal that this doesn’t have more upvotes…

    +1
  • PSA: Accurate F-14A Orthographic Images & Technical Data 3.5 years ago

    hi bakon egg
    i have an nft of the f-14 maunual here
    and a pdf here

    +1
  • [TEASER] It can PHLY! 3.5 years ago

    A/B looks much better now
    Nice work!
    Make sure it bleeds energy a bunch too, she was a phat bird

    +1
  • Airbus A380-841 Qantas [VH-OQA] 3.5 years ago

    YESSSSS
    I got to speak to Richard de Crespigny who was the pilot of this aircraft when QF32 had its number two engine uncontained failure. It was all over the news and I can remember it as a kid.
    He's an amazing man and he trained to fly F-111s (known as the Pig in Australia) but never went on to fly as a fighter pilot. QANTAS then took him in after his time in the military
    This is an amazing build - I'm sad I cannot run it but the looks alone are superb!

    +1
  • North American P-51D-10NA Mustang 3.5 years ago

    Im lucky enough to have performed service on a CA-18 Mustang (Aussie built D series) and I must say there is a good amount of things that you’ve gotten right.
    The flight model is alright - it’s just the takeoff and full pitch banking that lets it down.
    Another thing to note is that the flaps do the opposite of what they normally do, not sure why but off of memory on the mustang because the flaps are partially behind the CoM, they should pitch the nose down - but in return they allow for lower landing speeds. The flaps you’ve made aren’t great as they don’t have their special preset degrees, which are 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50, where 20 is for takeoffs and low speed combat and 10 is for higher speed combat and the other 3 are for landings depending on the pilot. The mustang generally holds its speed at around 350 km/h off memory. I’ll have to check the notes I took on the performance of it. Again.
    Another thing. The shape on this mustang is pretty solid. You’ve missed some basic and easy to add details, along with the canopy’s shape which is thoroughly different. Not only that but the cockpit - holy crap is it different. You’d think it’s a poorly funded replica cockpit.
    All in all however you’ve captured the broader image of the Mustang and I love it!
    I’ve gotta make my own mustang now :)
    Edit I remembered why the flaps make the nose go down: the CoL is raised above the CoG or CoM and the drag combined with the change is CoL pushes down on the bottom of the aircraft.

    +1
  • Track Concept - 2 3.5 years ago

    It’s not FT it’s xml lol
    Just change disableAircraftCollisions to false and then it’ll work. @Chickendude

    +1
  • Track Concept - 2 3.5 years ago

    You gotta disable collisions for tracks using XML editing otherwise they don’t work ever, and will procede to blow up

    +1
  • MiG-19 ROC 3.5 years ago

    Comin up!
    @X99STRIKER
    :beef pahpcernwbutter:

    +1
  • Leopard A1A2 (MBT-1A6) 3.5 years ago

    hap birday wiib

    +1
  • Walk Addition to SP VR 3.5 years ago

    Would be nice, but more additions to be able to walk to / look at outside of your build would benefit this immensely.

    +1
  • (Closed) Modern Defence Vehicle Challenge 3.5 years ago

    Sounds Awesome! Looking forward to it :) @MuizTheMobileFriendly

    +1
  • AY YO MODS OR ANDREW! CAN WE GET SOME MORE ACTIVATION GROUPS? 3.5 years ago

    No need
    Switches and stuff do it all now

    +1
  • (Closed) Modern Defence Vehicle Challenge 3.5 years ago

    @Viper_Z3R0 Wilco Viper, look forward to seeing it :)

    +1