@Cadvalto So, uh, you take a screenshot, and then use that as a "blueprint" in the blueprints tab. You have to move it away from the build and then size it up.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Ok, imma be honest, the Mark 13 was pretty bad. Premature explosion, drift, running WAY too deep, detonator was a total dud most of the time. Basically, if it was an issue on the Mark 14, the Mark 13 had it too
@InconsistentMuiz IIRC, it's because the design was basically just "slap what ya can on it", and never really had any actual specifications other than the Kanji for " big f-cking plane" in bold
@TriStar Huh??
@Apollo018362 Fix how?
Push for gold?
@TemporaryReplacement Thank you!
Tags:
@TemporaryReplacement
@ThomasRoderick Oh, nice. Wanna be tagged on my ISU-152?
@ThomasRoderick Huh?
@TemporaryReplacement Indeed!
@TemporaryReplacement
@TemporaryReplacement I guess the SU-14-1 is next haha
@TemporaryReplacement I take it I should do more of SU and ISU series assault guns???
@Graingy I was scarred
first
Ah nice, the 11th Air Regiment!
@Cadvalto So, uh, you take a screenshot, and then use that as a "blueprint" in the blueprints tab. You have to move it away from the build and then size it up.
Cyber truck x Char 2C
@Ididaplane Frfr
perhaps an He-111 next?~
@Alternation Its just not your turn with it
@Daniloxidado For reall
The average SP player has 1 of these, and it's smooth and spherical
@DatFiat126Fan19 Yes??
@DatFiat126Fan19 Oof, thank you for helping though
@Wolfy26 Aww thank you! Do you have Discord?
I bet this would force Japan to make the post 1942 aircraft in 1939 or so so actually fight this thing
Is there any chance we might get an upgraded E14Y or E13A?
@Noob101 Samee
@Yourlocalhuman Why not something from Imp rail Yappin'?
Nice! Kinda looks like the original design for the TOG I
This is really cool, but, a pulse jet needs a LOT of air, so, it needs to be above or below the body
@TemporaryReplacement Ooh lawd, I did 3 of the Beehive rounds, and it shattered my tablet
@Monarchii Kinda like Blyatnov's I-19 and I-400 (with functioning aircraft)
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Yep
Sorry for the late post, I just now remembered in Second Block haha
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Lol, it's ok
@Wywtt080 1st) only the first 3 tags are actually tagged, 2) did they all ask for it?
Here before Da Rodent
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Ok, imma be honest, the Mark 13 was pretty bad. Premature explosion, drift, running WAY too deep, detonator was a total dud most of the time. Basically, if it was an issue on the Mark 14, the Mark 13 had it too
@TheUltimatePlaneLover No, I'm saying that using the Mark-13 to sink Japanese ships was oxymoronic
Oh neat! Also uh..
Oxymoronic statement
@Monarchii I mean, all the sub has to do is be a stable catapult platform, so it could be a draught-less grey hull on the water for all I care tbh
@Monarchii How about a Type B3 class? There's not any good Type Bs other than Blyatnov's kinda outdated I-19
Hey, any chance you might could make any of the other models of Ohka? The Mod.11, Mod.33 and Mod.43 ko seem to be pretty interesting designs.
@InconsistentMuiz IIRC, it's because the design was basically just "slap what ya can on it", and never really had any actual specifications other than the Kanji for " big f-cking plane" in bold
@TheMouse ah, on my schreen it says your's is first, my apologies
@TemporaryReplacement ahh
@TemporaryReplacement would it be possible to use AAMs? or do you want propellor driven drones?
@Graingy I legit just make all my glass 446677 at max gloss and metallics
@Trainzo Thank you
@Wywtt080 There's no-one here called that...