Design: 10/10: I like the many details you added, a cockpit was missing, but the details cover that. good job!
Realism: 9/10: I like it. But there are some drawbacks. Pitch and roll agility is quite a bit, but it's ok. But, you can't take off, as the tires were too sensitive, you can't take off, let alone land.
Description: 8/10: You used Wikipedia, but there are instructions on AG. If there were more specs (like weight, top speed, cruise speed, etc.), you could achieve 10.
Maneuverability: 9.5/10: It's pretty agile, but it's OK.
Performance: 9.5/10: The bombs work perfectly, I like that. But the machine guns are no good. They break the rear and directly affect the body of the plane.
Good job! You did a great job, there are mistakes, but I hope you can learn from them. I give you a solution for the machine guns: Open XML/Overload, and you will find a command: "disableAircraftColision", and it will be in "false", change it to "true", so it won't hurt the plane and the performance will be better. You can damage enemy aircraft, congratulations!
@Christiant2 In addition to Wikipedia, there is more description that describes the aircraft and is specific about it, the description is long. I'm expressing my opinion, it's nothing against it. Well, a little bit. A little bit. A... A little bit. Tiny...
@Christiant2 Am I in second place? The plane seems very good to me, and I put my spin on it. Is it to save parts or something? Xd (Nothing against it, I just want to know how to improve)
@Zillyguy2 Ah, I got you! The first aircraft I publicly uploaded was a P-51-D, over 10 months ago, but I deleted it. That was definitely the first plane
• Design: 7/10 It's a bit strange, also the gull wings are incomplete. But you have an idea of what it is like, more or less.
• Realism: 6/10 Very low speed, barely able to reach 200 km/h. This directly affects maneuverability.
• Description: 8/10 Use Wiki, but the description describes the plane. not so bad.
• Maneuverability: 6.5/10 Maneuverability is good, but the low speed directly affects it, and makes it very lacking.
• Performance: 7/10 He needs machine guns to defend himself at least, if not, he is shot down very easily. Plus the bombs do little damage.
Maybe the results are not what you expected, but don't give up! I was like that before, but you can improve, practice, you can learn from your mistakes. Thanks for participating!
Design: 10/10 I love how you mixed a B-17 and a C-47! It is charming, including its details. It's a love!
Realism: 9/10: The pitch and roll agree with the shape of the plane and its mass if it were real. a cabin was missing.
Description: 8/10: It's long, it describes the plane, and I'm happy with that, but I think it could have been longer, or been more specific. I hope you didn't use Wikipedia, RIGHT? 😶
Maneuverability: 10/10 Good! The pitch and roll match the airplane and are smooth.
Performance: 10/10 Serves as military transport, supplies, etc. Good job! I congratulate you for this.
Pin pls
@Christiant2 I started in June 2022 or late 2023. But I didn't have an account, so no one knew about it. Hey, I'm going to do a challenge too, do you want to participate?
@LimeAir Well, what happens to me is that when I start to gain speed, the landing gear breaks.
Here's my opinion: (Don't take it personally)
Design: 10/10: I like the many details you added, a cockpit was missing, but the details cover that. good job!
Realism: 9/10: I like it. But there are some drawbacks. Pitch and roll agility is quite a bit, but it's ok. But, you can't take off, as the tires were too sensitive, you can't take off, let alone land.
Description: 8/10: You used Wikipedia, but there are instructions on AG. If there were more specs (like weight, top speed, cruise speed, etc.), you could achieve 10.
Maneuverability: 9.5/10: It's pretty agile, but it's OK.
Performance: 9.5/10: The bombs work perfectly, I like that. But the machine guns are no good. They break the rear and directly affect the body of the plane.
Good job! You did a great job, there are mistakes, but I hope you can learn from them. I give you a solution for the machine guns: Open XML/Overload, and you will find a command: "disableAircraftColision", and it will be in "false", change it to "true", so it won't hurt the plane and the performance will be better. You can damage enemy aircraft, congratulations!
pin pls
@Zillyguy2 This plane
Changing the subject, what is your favorite plane?
Congratulations!
@nukethefrench How creative
@Christiant2 In addition to Wikipedia, there is more description that describes the aircraft and is specific about it, the description is long. I'm expressing my opinion, it's nothing against it. Well, a little bit. A little bit. A... A little bit. Tiny...
@Christiant2 Am I in second place? The plane seems very good to me, and I put my spin on it. Is it to save parts or something? Xd (Nothing against it, I just want to know how to improve)
@Christiant2 You haven't added me to your friends list in your description 😭 (I don't give a damn xd)
No me has agregado a tu lista de amigos en la descripción 😭 (Me viene valiendo 3 kilos de madre xd)
👀
@Zillyguy2 And what did you think of the plane? :D
@Zillyguy2 I said: Realistic Cockpit 🥺
🥺
@Zillyguy2 Ah, I got you! The first aircraft I publicly uploaded was a P-51-D, over 10 months ago, but I deleted it. That was definitely the first plane
• Design: 7/10 It's a bit strange, also the gull wings are incomplete. But you have an idea of what it is like, more or less.
• Realism: 6/10 Very low speed, barely able to reach 200 km/h. This directly affects maneuverability.
• Description: 8/10 Use Wiki, but the description describes the plane. not so bad.
• Maneuverability: 6.5/10 Maneuverability is good, but the low speed directly affects it, and makes it very lacking.
• Performance: 7/10 He needs machine guns to defend himself at least, if not, he is shot down very easily. Plus the bombs do little damage.
Maybe the results are not what you expected, but don't give up! I was like that before, but you can improve, practice, you can learn from your mistakes. Thanks for participating!
pin pls
@derjohannes Yep!
@Susimposter Ahhh! It was an old version, too small and lacking in details.
@Zillyguy2 My old plane? What do you mean?
@Christiant2 gruesa la de aquí abajo- digo, sí, claro.
No me avisaron que había colab
Uff, I feel aviation stuff 👄👄
@Rb2h tuntuntun
@Christiant2 Well, I'll wait for you.
Me mama el albur, no se por qué JAJAJAJ
@Christiant2 I just love puns and humour. That's how I get along with people. Don't be offended!
@Pedese Neta? WOW, ya van 3 mexicanos que conozco
@JABH It's not true! HAHAHA 🤣🤣
@Christiant2 I want to see 😏
@Pedese In my Mexico it is a success
Here my opinion:
Design: 10/10 I love how you mixed a B-17 and a C-47! It is charming, including its details. It's a love!
Realism: 9/10: The pitch and roll agree with the shape of the plane and its mass if it were real. a cabin was missing.
Description: 8/10: It's long, it describes the plane, and I'm happy with that, but I think it could have been longer, or been more specific. I hope you didn't use Wikipedia, RIGHT? 😶
Maneuverability: 10/10 Good! The pitch and roll match the airplane and are smooth.
Performance: 10/10 Serves as military transport, supplies, etc. Good job! I congratulate you for this.
Pin pls
Don't make me crave it! 🤤🤤
I'm in!
Here my opinion:
• Design: (9.5/10) I love its details and paint, good job! But there are some drawbacks in the design, such as the cabin.
• Realism: 10/10 I love that you made a cabin! 🤩 Also, it's fictional and you did it right.
• Description: 6.5/10 The Description is short
• Maneuverability: 9.5/10 Pitch maneuverability is smooth and so is roll. I like it.
• Performance: 10/10 It is a fighter-bomber, it has good performance!
@Galaxyace yess
@TheOfficalMarylander Yea!
@Christiant2 Yea
Here my opinion (Don't take it personally)
• Design: 8/10 Not bad, it is a twin-engine plane. It fits well!
• Realism: 9/10 This is more or less.
• Description: 5/10 Very short description.
• Maneuverability: 7/10 The pitch maneuverability is quite low, and the roll is more or less.
• Performance: 8/10 Machine guns should be added, and cannon ammo is low. but it does its job very well attacking the ground.
Pin pls
@Christiant2 So fast? :0
@Christiant2 ESE ES MI PINCHE CHRISTIANT!!! 🇲🇽🇲🇽🇲🇽
I LOVE THIS PLANE. 😻😻
HAHAHA WHAT IS THIS?
@DogThatMakesPlanes Thanks! <3
@DogThatMakesPlanes Oh, sure. But you should have added more machine guns to make it effective.
ATTENTION: My opinion, no one else's, mine, always mine, me. It doesn't directly affect the challenge because I'm not the host, but I will weigh in.
Aircraft pitch: 10/10. He has agility.
Warp (Roll): 9/10. It is slower than pitch, and in fact sometimes it is the same or faster than pitch.
Yaw: 10/10. What can I say?
Travel performance: 10/10. Well.
Combat performance: 5/10. They shoot me down very quickly, the machine guns do little damage.
Not bad! I assume it is a transport plane.
@DogThatMakesPlanes Sorry! Google Translate doesn't work. I don't speak English perfectly lol. Is it fictional or a replica?
I can't post today, but I will post it tomorrow. It's about World War II.
@Christiant2 I started in June 2022 or late 2023. But I didn't have an account, so no one knew about it. Hey, I'm going to do a challenge too, do you want to participate?
How did it take off? Xd
I love water planes 😍😻
Looks good! Is it a dummy or a replica?