@Pakdaaircraftindustries JAJAAJ, está bien, permito hacer otro avión, pero trata de hacerlo bien. Y por si te lo preguntabas, sí, yo hablo español, es mi lengua natal
Parce, la verdad no me gusta este avión. El avión no es maniobrable y entra en pérdida. Te soy sincero, este avión no puede competir. Te doy la oportunidad de hacer otro avión, pero poniéndole ganas, ¿vale? Asegúrate de que tenga buena agilidad y sea seguro, y una cabina bien hecha no estaría mal. (Palabras colombianas pa' que le entiendas)
• Design: 10/10 I love it. I don't have much to say.
• Realism: 9.5/10 I like it, good takeoff, good landing, although the Flaps had an error because when you lower the flaps, one goes up and one goes down, and it works as a roll. but the above and this can cover this failure.
• Description: 0/10 Oh! The description was missing. The description is very important, you can put specifications, history, etc. I allow you to create a description after this.
• Maneuverability: 10/10 In my opinion, it agrees with the way the plane is made.
• Performance: 10/10 Seaplane Bomber with Gunner that you can move with the camera. You have unique talent, brother.
• Design: 7/10 It's a little strange, and doesn't fit well.
• Realism: 6/10 Agility is bad, straight up. Plus, it can't take off because it crashes.
• Description: 8/10 You used Wikipedia, but that's okay.
• Maneuverability: 6/10 The problem is that agility causes the plane to go into a spin, and the gyroscope does help, but it affects several methods of attack.
• Performance: 7/10 The rockets and machine guns are fine, but you can't do a dive bombing through the gyroscope, and the plane is easily shot down.
Don't be discouraged, you are learning to make airplanes. Keep trying and learning from your mistakes!
@Christiant2 Blue
https://spinningrat.online/ Acaba de jugar esto. por qué? Idk
Seriously, this content creator is called cats? Xd
@GabeT 👀
@Christiant2 It just doesn't have one 😭
Forgot your password? LOL good job.
Simple 🥺
How much support 🥺
LOLOLOL THE MINIATURE LOLOLOL
?
The cockpit: 🥺
Hi, can you make a Mexican version? 🥺
@Pakdaaircraftindustries JAJAAJ, está bien, permito hacer otro avión, pero trata de hacerlo bien. Y por si te lo preguntabas, sí, yo hablo español, es mi lengua natal
Parce, la verdad no me gusta este avión. El avión no es maniobrable y entra en pérdida. Te soy sincero, este avión no puede competir. Te doy la oportunidad de hacer otro avión, pero poniéndole ganas, ¿vale? Asegúrate de que tenga buena agilidad y sea seguro, y una cabina bien hecha no estaría mal. (Palabras colombianas pa' que le entiendas)
Hola, parece que hablas español, cierto?
Tired but in masculine, I am a man and I do not know English grammar.
I already tried the other plane you posted 8 hours ago
@Panchofly Months? How long do you work?
Seaplanes are my love 😻
Statistics:
• Design: 10/10 I love it. I don't have much to say.
• Realism: 9.5/10 I like it, good takeoff, good landing, although the Flaps had an error because when you lower the flaps, one goes up and one goes down, and it works as a roll. but the above and this can cover this failure.
• Description: 0/10 Oh! The description was missing. The description is very important, you can put specifications, history, etc. I allow you to create a description after this.
• Maneuverability: 10/10 In my opinion, it agrees with the way the plane is made.
• Performance: 10/10 Seaplane Bomber with Gunner that you can move with the camera. You have unique talent, brother.
Congratulations! You have a lot of talent.
pin pls
@Pakdaaircraftindustries pues espero resultados 💪
@MajorFreischmidt Whenever you want
You've made me love this plane. I've definitely decided who's in first place. I'll upload the stats soon. pin pls
@spootfire Very busy 😬
@Christiant2 6 days ago
@Christiant2 Pearl Harbor, Morning of December 7, 1941?
@KivotosMIKA I didn't say it was wrong
Good job!
For anyone who comes to comment, please respect the past of this aircraft. And don't act ignorant, you know why you came.
Huh????
Not bad! Just what many will need, like me.
@Zillyguy2 Ummh... Yes, yes I can
@ImLvLiCHN Well, Spanish would be good, but I can translate.
@ImLvLiCHN uhhhhh...? I barely know any English because I'm studying it, I don't understand Chinese 😬
@ImLvLiCHN Hi, sorry for not answering, I'm not always up to date, maybe I have time to check it.
@NormalCv580enjoyer Ok? Rest in peace, but I wasn't expecting that long text at all.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 mexico?
I love the P-51 + I love WWII planes = Happiness for me
Hello, congratulations? Hehe
Ah no, aquí no se habla español
Hola, q paso
Statistics:
• Design: 7/10 It's a little strange, and doesn't fit well.
• Realism: 6/10 Agility is bad, straight up. Plus, it can't take off because it crashes.
• Description: 8/10 You used Wikipedia, but that's okay.
• Maneuverability: 6/10 The problem is that agility causes the plane to go into a spin, and the gyroscope does help, but it affects several methods of attack.
• Performance: 7/10 The rockets and machine guns are fine, but you can't do a dive bombing through the gyroscope, and the plane is easily shot down.
Don't be discouraged, you are learning to make airplanes. Keep trying and learning from your mistakes!
Thanks for participating. pin pls
@Galaxyace Thank you for participating
@Christiant2 I can't guarantee anything but it's already 58% :)
@Christiant2 Yes
Hiroshima? 🥺
@Christiant2
@KPLBall Don't worry, I'm already used to it 😭🤑
@nukethefrench Deep in your heart you know that if you want
@GabeT I mean, of course, politics in transformation is important. I support it.