@Panzerwaifu69 If you have something in mind, of course! You are free to express. Just remember that this is within the period 1939-1945. There is no problem with that.
@Zillyguy2 Ah, I got you! The first aircraft I publicly uploaded was a P-51-D, over 10 months ago, but I deleted it. That was definitely the first plane
• Design: 7/10 It's a bit strange, also the gull wings are incomplete. But you have an idea of what it is like, more or less.
• Realism: 6/10 Very low speed, barely able to reach 200 km/h. This directly affects maneuverability.
• Description: 8/10 Use Wiki, but the description describes the plane. not so bad.
• Maneuverability: 6.5/10 Maneuverability is good, but the low speed directly affects it, and makes it very lacking.
• Performance: 7/10 He needs machine guns to defend himself at least, if not, he is shot down very easily. Plus the bombs do little damage.
Maybe the results are not what you expected, but don't give up! I was like that before, but you can improve, practice, you can learn from your mistakes. Thanks for participating!
We all know why we are here. 🌚 By the way, maximum respect to the passengers who suffered during a certain attack that I am not going to mention for obvious reasons. Respect guys.
Design: 10/10 I love how you mixed a B-17 and a C-47! It is charming, including its details. It's a love!
Realism: 9/10: The pitch and roll agree with the shape of the plane and its mass if it were real. a cabin was missing.
Description: 8/10: It's long, it describes the plane, and I'm happy with that, but I think it could have been longer, or been more specific. I hope you didn't use Wikipedia, RIGHT? 😶
Maneuverability: 10/10 Good! The pitch and roll match the airplane and are smooth.
Performance: 10/10 Serves as military transport, supplies, etc. Good job! I congratulate you for this.
Pin pls
@nukethefrench ouioui126
+1👀
@Zillyguy2 And what did you think of the plane? :D
@Panzerwaifu69 If you have something in mind, of course! You are free to express. Just remember that this is within the period 1939-1945. There is no problem with that.
+1@Zillyguy2 I said: Realistic Cockpit 🥺
🥺
@Zillyguy2 Ah, I got you! The first aircraft I publicly uploaded was a P-51-D, over 10 months ago, but I deleted it. That was definitely the first plane
• Design: 7/10 It's a bit strange, also the gull wings are incomplete. But you have an idea of what it is like, more or less.
• Realism: 6/10 Very low speed, barely able to reach 200 km/h. This directly affects maneuverability.
• Description: 8/10 Use Wiki, but the description describes the plane. not so bad.
• Maneuverability: 6.5/10 Maneuverability is good, but the low speed directly affects it, and makes it very lacking.
• Performance: 7/10 He needs machine guns to defend himself at least, if not, he is shot down very easily. Plus the bombs do little damage.
Maybe the results are not what you expected, but don't give up! I was like that before, but you can improve, practice, you can learn from your mistakes. Thanks for participating!
pin pls
@dekanii Whenever you want, my king 😉
+1@Numbers2 Yes, as long as they are within the 1939-1945 period. One idea is the Me 262.
+2@derjohannes Yep!
@Eagleman010 HA HA HA
+1Congratulations!
+1@Susimposter Ahhh! It was an old version, too small and lacking in details.
@Zillyguy2 My old plane? What do you mean?
@Christiant2 gruesa la de aquí abajo- digo, sí, claro.
No me avisaron que había colab
@FA18SUPERHORNET no (yea)
+1We all know why we are here. 🌚 By the way, maximum respect to the passengers who suffered during a certain attack that I am not going to mention for obvious reasons. Respect guys.
+4Uff, I feel aviation stuff 👄👄
@Rb2h tuntuntun
@Christiant2 Well, I'll wait for you.
Me mama el albur, no se por qué JAJAJAJ
@Christiant2 I just love puns and humour. That's how I get along with people. Don't be offended!
@Pedese Neta? WOW, ya van 3 mexicanos que conozco
@JABH It's not true! HAHAHA 🤣🤣
@Christiant2 I want to see 😏
@Christiant2 Nah, that doesn't count as a description.
+1@Pedese In my Mexico it is a success
Here my opinion:
Design: 10/10 I love how you mixed a B-17 and a C-47! It is charming, including its details. It's a love!
Realism: 9/10: The pitch and roll agree with the shape of the plane and its mass if it were real. a cabin was missing.
Description: 8/10: It's long, it describes the plane, and I'm happy with that, but I think it could have been longer, or been more specific. I hope you didn't use Wikipedia, RIGHT? 😶
Maneuverability: 10/10 Good! The pitch and roll match the airplane and are smooth.
Performance: 10/10 Serves as military transport, supplies, etc. Good job! I congratulate you for this.
Pin pls
Don't make me crave it! 🤤🤤
I'm in!
@Christiant2 I'll try it right away!
+1Here my opinion:
• Design: (9.5/10) I love its details and paint, good job! But there are some drawbacks in the design, such as the cabin.
• Realism: 10/10 I love that you made a cabin! 🤩 Also, it's fictional and you did it right.
• Description: 6.5/10 The Description is short
• Maneuverability: 9.5/10 Pitch maneuverability is smooth and so is roll. I like it.
• Performance: 10/10 It is a fighter-bomber, it has good performance!
@Galaxyace yess
@TheOfficalMarylander Yea!
@Christiant2 Yea
Here my opinion (Don't take it personally)
• Design: 8/10 Not bad, it is a twin-engine plane. It fits well!
• Realism: 9/10 This is more or less.
• Description: 5/10 Very short description.
• Maneuverability: 7/10 The pitch maneuverability is quite low, and the roll is more or less.
• Performance: 8/10 Machine guns should be added, and cannon ammo is low. but it does its job very well attacking the ground.
Pin pls
@Christiant2 So fast? :0
@Christiant2 ESE ES MI PINCHE CHRISTIANT!!! 🇲🇽🇲🇽🇲🇽
I LOVE THIS PLANE. 😻😻
Why doesn't he have support?
+1@CaptainBrayden Ok! But why are we shouting?
+1@nukethefrench He is learning 🥺
+1@nukethefrench Thank you very much, I have future projects that you might like. <3
+1HAHAHA WHAT IS THIS?
@DogThatMakesPlanes Thanks! <3
@DogThatMakesPlanes Oh, sure. But you should have added more machine guns to make it effective.
ATTENTION: My opinion, no one else's, mine, always mine, me. It doesn't directly affect the challenge because I'm not the host, but I will weigh in.
Aircraft pitch: 10/10. He has agility.
Warp (Roll): 9/10. It is slower than pitch, and in fact sometimes it is the same or faster than pitch.
Yaw: 10/10. What can I say?
Travel performance: 10/10. Well.
Combat performance: 5/10. They shoot me down very quickly, the machine guns do little damage.
Not bad! I assume it is a transport plane.
@DogThatMakesPlanes Sorry! Google Translate doesn't work. I don't speak English perfectly lol. Is it fictional or a replica?