Opinion (Personal opinion, mine, no one else's, me, always mine, my personal, mine)
Design: 10/10: For a fictional plane, I like the shape of it. and the floodgates gave it the final touch.
Realism: 10/10: Both roll and pitch agree with the structure, easy takeoff and landing, good speed, and the cabin was Nice. -
Description: 9.5/10: There are specifications, instructions on AG, and possible history of this fictional plane. It doesn't detail much about the story, but I like it
Maneuverability: 10/10, for being a fast fighter-bomber, its maneuverability is good and as I said before, it matches the structure of the plane.
Performance: 10/10: Eliminate enemies easily with the machine gun, and the bombs serve perfectly.
A great story was made in SP :0 One question... Can I make planes to support this story? Whether it's for the allied or enemy side, you name it! I'm pretty good at making planes. I think.
Design: 10/10: I like the many details you added, a cockpit was missing, but the details cover that. good job!
Realism: 9/10: I like it. But there are some drawbacks. Pitch and roll agility is quite a bit, but it's ok. But, you can't take off, as the tires were too sensitive, you can't take off, let alone land.
Description: 8/10: You used Wikipedia, but there are instructions on AG. If there were more specs (like weight, top speed, cruise speed, etc.), you could achieve 10.
Maneuverability: 9.5/10: It's pretty agile, but it's OK.
Performance: 9.5/10: The bombs work perfectly, I like that. But the machine guns are no good. They break the rear and directly affect the body of the plane.
Good job! You did a great job, there are mistakes, but I hope you can learn from them. I give you a solution for the machine guns: Open XML/Overload, and you will find a command: "disableAircraftColision", and it will be in "false", change it to "true", so it won't hurt the plane and the performance will be better. You can damage enemy aircraft, congratulations!
@Christiant2 In addition to Wikipedia, there is more description that describes the aircraft and is specific about it, the description is long. I'm expressing my opinion, it's nothing against it. Well, a little bit. A little bit. A... A little bit. Tiny...
@Christiant2 Am I in second place? The plane seems very good to me, and I put my spin on it. Is it to save parts or something? Xd (Nothing against it, I just want to know how to improve)
@Panzerwaifu69 If you have something in mind, of course! You are free to express. Just remember that this is within the period 1939-1945. There is no problem with that.
@Zillyguy2 Ah, I got you! The first aircraft I publicly uploaded was a P-51-D, over 10 months ago, but I deleted it. That was definitely the first plane
• Design: 7/10 It's a bit strange, also the gull wings are incomplete. But you have an idea of what it is like, more or less.
• Realism: 6/10 Very low speed, barely able to reach 200 km/h. This directly affects maneuverability.
• Description: 8/10 Use Wiki, but the description describes the plane. not so bad.
• Maneuverability: 6.5/10 Maneuverability is good, but the low speed directly affects it, and makes it very lacking.
• Performance: 7/10 He needs machine guns to defend himself at least, if not, he is shot down very easily. Plus the bombs do little damage.
Maybe the results are not what you expected, but don't give up! I was like that before, but you can improve, practice, you can learn from your mistakes. Thanks for participating!
@hshshshh Ah, I understand! Still, it doesn't take away that talent you have, ehh
@Randomplayer And his only has 1/2? 😦
MAPA is a legendary content creator 😯
+5But your tummy doesn't hurt anymore? 🥺
(LOL My comment is humor, one or another... Yes, they take it seriously)
+1DC-3
+1TwentyThree
I've been building a lot of Japanese planes (not uploaded) and I've already learned the word "Mitsubishi" perfectly. Great plane!
@Anoyingperson Hey, I can only rate one. Which one do you want me to rate?
@Anoyingperson As long as it's from WWII.
I'll try it right away. Be patient!
Opinion (Personal opinion, mine, no one else's, me, always mine, my personal, mine)
Design: 10/10: For a fictional plane, I like the shape of it. and the floodgates gave it the final touch.
Realism: 10/10: Both roll and pitch agree with the structure, easy takeoff and landing, good speed, and the cabin was Nice. -
Description: 9.5/10: There are specifications, instructions on AG, and possible history of this fictional plane. It doesn't detail much about the story, but I like it
Maneuverability: 10/10, for being a fast fighter-bomber, its maneuverability is good and as I said before, it matches the structure of the plane.
Performance: 10/10: Eliminate enemies easily with the machine gun, and the bombs serve perfectly.
I congratulate you for your great work!
pin pls
I'm not sure if you're new, check out that talent
Good news! You share first place with @strangerfromtheinternet ! You both did a great job. What rewards will you want? 😃
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Of course!
@KPLBall Party
@KPLBall He already answered me xd
@Zillyguy2 Yes! I can use it as an excuse not to lend my cell phone to my little cousin.
😻
+1This is going to be fun.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Of course! I'd be happy to contribute to any event.
Purpose of this? Xd
@IQinventory The pleasure is mine!
+1A great story was made in SP :0 One question... Can I make planes to support this story? Whether it's for the allied or enemy side, you name it! I'm pretty good at making planes. I think.
It is clear to me that aircraft production is constant.
He did it.
I would recommend first eliminating the destroyer ships or vessels, whatever, so that they are not a nuisance, or at least reducing it.
Will you ever answer me?
+1@IQinventory Just to know, you see, out of curiosity. What country do you live in and what time is it there? Xd
+1@IQinventory High five bro, I'm with you. Always helping low-end cell phone players. ;) (I was one of them, that's why I'm here now)
+1@IQinventory *Mobile friendly
+1@IQinventory Are you also a content creator of few pieces? I'm not alone then 🤩
+1@LimeAir Well, what happens to me is that when I start to gain speed, the landing gear breaks.
Here's my opinion: (Don't take it personally)
Design: 10/10: I like the many details you added, a cockpit was missing, but the details cover that. good job!
Realism: 9/10: I like it. But there are some drawbacks. Pitch and roll agility is quite a bit, but it's ok. But, you can't take off, as the tires were too sensitive, you can't take off, let alone land.
Description: 8/10: You used Wikipedia, but there are instructions on AG. If there were more specs (like weight, top speed, cruise speed, etc.), you could achieve 10.
Maneuverability: 9.5/10: It's pretty agile, but it's OK.
Performance: 9.5/10: The bombs work perfectly, I like that. But the machine guns are no good. They break the rear and directly affect the body of the plane.
Good job! You did a great job, there are mistakes, but I hope you can learn from them. I give you a solution for the machine guns: Open XML/Overload, and you will find a command: "disableAircraftColision", and it will be in "false", change it to "true", so it won't hurt the plane and the performance will be better. You can damage enemy aircraft, congratulations!
pin pls
@Zillyguy2 This plane
Changing the subject, what is your favorite plane?
Congratulations!
Compliments 😍
+1@nukethefrench How creative
@Christiant2 In addition to Wikipedia, there is more description that describes the aircraft and is specific about it, the description is long. I'm expressing my opinion, it's nothing against it. Well, a little bit. A little bit. A... A little bit. Tiny...
@Christiant2 Am I in second place? The plane seems very good to me, and I put my spin on it. Is it to save parts or something? Xd (Nothing against it, I just want to know how to improve)
@Christiant2 You haven't added me to your friends list in your description 😭 (I don't give a damn xd)
No me has agregado a tu lista de amigos en la descripción 😭 (Me viene valiendo 3 kilos de madre xd)
@nukethefrench ouioui126
+1👀
@Zillyguy2 And what did you think of the plane? :D
@Panzerwaifu69 If you have something in mind, of course! You are free to express. Just remember that this is within the period 1939-1945. There is no problem with that.
+1@Zillyguy2 I said: Realistic Cockpit 🥺
🥺
@Zillyguy2 Ah, I got you! The first aircraft I publicly uploaded was a P-51-D, over 10 months ago, but I deleted it. That was definitely the first plane
• Design: 7/10 It's a bit strange, also the gull wings are incomplete. But you have an idea of what it is like, more or less.
• Realism: 6/10 Very low speed, barely able to reach 200 km/h. This directly affects maneuverability.
• Description: 8/10 Use Wiki, but the description describes the plane. not so bad.
• Maneuverability: 6.5/10 Maneuverability is good, but the low speed directly affects it, and makes it very lacking.
• Performance: 7/10 He needs machine guns to defend himself at least, if not, he is shot down very easily. Plus the bombs do little damage.
Maybe the results are not what you expected, but don't give up! I was like that before, but you can improve, practice, you can learn from your mistakes. Thanks for participating!
pin pls
@dekanii Whenever you want, my king 😉
+1