6,995 JABH Comments

  • TB-War Treaty 10 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Of course!

  • B22B Segregator 10 months ago

    @KPLBall Party

  • TB-War Treaty 10 months ago

    @KPLBall He already answered me xd

  • Random 10 months ago

    @Zillyguy2 Yes! I can use it as an excuse not to lend my cell phone to my little cousin.

  • MIG-31M FOXHOUND 10 months ago

    😻

    +1
  • Nightmare 10 months ago

    This is going to be fun.

  • TB-War Treaty 10 months ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Of course! I'd be happy to contribute to any event.

  • Random 10 months ago

    Purpose of this? Xd

  • F-100 SUPERSABRE 10 months ago

    @IQinventory The pleasure is mine!

    +1
  • TB-War Treaty 10 months ago

    A great story was made in SP :0 One question... Can I make planes to support this story? Whether it's for the allied or enemy side, you name it! I'm pretty good at making planes. I think.

  • B22B Segregator 10 months ago

    It is clear to me that aircraft production is constant.

  • Should I start again 10 months ago

    He did it.

  • How to get almost killed in 2 minutes and 14 seconds 10 months ago

    I would recommend first eliminating the destroyer ships or vessels, whatever, so that they are not a nuisance, or at least reducing it.

  • MEGA POLIZONTE 10 months ago

    Will you ever answer me?

    +1
  • F-100 SUPERSABRE 10 months ago

    @IQinventory Just to know, you see, out of curiosity. What country do you live in and what time is it there? Xd

    +1
  • F-100 SUPERSABRE 10 months ago

    @IQinventory High five bro, I'm with you. Always helping low-end cell phone players. ;) (I was one of them, that's why I'm here now)

    +1
  • F-100 SUPERSABRE 10 months ago

    @IQinventory *Mobile friendly

    +1
  • F-100 SUPERSABRE 10 months ago

    @IQinventory Are you also a content creator of few pieces? I'm not alone then 🤩

    +1
  • Ilyushin Il-4 Bob 10 months ago

    @LimeAir Well, what happens to me is that when I start to gain speed, the landing gear breaks.

  • Ilyushin Il-4 Bob 10 months ago

    Here's my opinion: (Don't take it personally)

    • Design: 10/10: I like the many details you added, a cockpit was missing, but the details cover that. good job!

    • Realism: 9/10: I like it. But there are some drawbacks. Pitch and roll agility is quite a bit, but it's ok. But, you can't take off, as the tires were too sensitive, you can't take off, let alone land.

    • Description: 8/10: You used Wikipedia, but there are instructions on AG. If there were more specs (like weight, top speed, cruise speed, etc.), you could achieve 10.

    • Maneuverability: 9.5/10: It's pretty agile, but it's OK.

    • Performance: 9.5/10: The bombs work perfectly, I like that. But the machine guns are no good. They break the rear and directly affect the body of the plane.

    Good job! You did a great job, there are mistakes, but I hope you can learn from them. I give you a solution for the machine guns: Open XML/Overload, and you will find a command: "disableAircraftColision", and it will be in "false", change it to "true", so it won't hurt the plane and the performance will be better. You can damage enemy aircraft, congratulations!

    pin pls

  • Mitsubishi A6M2 Zero Kamikaze 10 months ago

    @Zillyguy2 This plane

  • SuperMarine SpitFire 10 months ago

    Changing the subject, what is your favorite plane?

  • 10K?!?! 10 months ago

    Congratulations!

  • F-100 SUPERSABRE 10 months ago

    Compliments 😍

    +1
  • SuperMarine SpitFire 10 months ago

    @nukethefrench How creative

  • MIG-21 10 months ago

    @Christiant2 In addition to Wikipedia, there is more description that describes the aircraft and is specific about it, the description is long. I'm expressing my opinion, it's nothing against it. Well, a little bit. A little bit. A... A little bit. Tiny...

  • MIG-21 10 months ago

    @Christiant2 Am I in second place? The plane seems very good to me, and I put my spin on it. Is it to save parts or something? Xd (Nothing against it, I just want to know how to improve)

  • i need help on this B-58 10 months ago

    @Christiant2 You haven't added me to your friends list in your description 😭 (I don't give a damn xd)

    No me has agregado a tu lista de amigos en la descripción 😭 (Me viene valiendo 3 kilos de madre xd)

  • SuperMarine SpitFire 10 months ago

    @nukethefrench ouioui126

    +1
  • F-8E 10 months ago

    👀

  • Mitsubishi A6M2 Zero Kamikaze 10 months ago

    @Zillyguy2 And what did you think of the plane? :D

  • World War II Challenge (Closed) 10 months ago

    @Panzerwaifu69 If you have something in mind, of course! You are free to express. Just remember that this is within the period 1939-1945. There is no problem with that.

    +1
  • Mitsubishi A6M2 Zero Kamikaze 10 months ago

    @Zillyguy2 I said: Realistic Cockpit 🥺

  • Junkers Ju-87 Stuka but simple 10 months ago

    🥺

  • Mitsubishi A6M2 Zero Kamikaze 10 months ago

    @Zillyguy2 Ah, I got you! The first aircraft I publicly uploaded was a P-51-D, over 10 months ago, but I deleted it. That was definitely the first plane

  • Junkers Ju-87 G1 Stuka 10 months ago

    • Design: 7/10 It's a bit strange, also the gull wings are incomplete. But you have an idea of what it is like, more or less.

    • Realism: 6/10 Very low speed, barely able to reach 200 km/h. This directly affects maneuverability.

    • Description: 8/10 Use Wiki, but the description describes the plane. not so bad.

    • Maneuverability: 6.5/10 Maneuverability is good, but the low speed directly affects it, and makes it very lacking.

    • Performance: 7/10 He needs machine guns to defend himself at least, if not, he is shot down very easily. Plus the bombs do little damage.

    Maybe the results are not what you expected, but don't give up! I was like that before, but you can improve, practice, you can learn from your mistakes. Thanks for participating!

    pin pls

  • World War II Challenge (Closed) 10 months ago

    @dekanii Whenever you want, my king 😉

    +1
  • World War II Challenge (Closed) 10 months ago

    @Numbers2 Yes, as long as they are within the 1939-1945 period. One idea is the Me 262.

    +2
  • World War II Challenge (Closed) 10 months ago

    @derjohannes Yep!

  • Thank You All For Bronze 10 months ago

    @Eagleman010 HA HA HA

    +1
  • Thank You All For Bronze 10 months ago

    Congratulations!

    +1
  • Mitsubishi A6M2 Zero Kamikaze 10 months ago

    @Susimposter Ahhh! It was an old version, too small and lacking in details.

  • Mitsubishi A6M2 Zero Kamikaze 10 months ago

    @Zillyguy2 My old plane? What do you mean?

  • F-14 Tomcat 10 months ago

    @Christiant2 gruesa la de aquí abajo- digo, sí, claro.

  • F-14 Tomcat 10 months ago

    No me avisaron que había colab

  • World War II Challenge (Closed) 10 months ago

    @FA18SUPERHORNET no (yea)

    +1
  • Boeing 767-200ER Heavy (American Airlines) 10 months ago

    We all know why we are here. 🌚 By the way, maximum respect to the passengers who suffered during a certain attack that I am not going to mention for obvious reasons. Respect guys.

    +4
  • Boeing 707-300 Heavy (VIP) 10 months ago

    Uff, I feel aviation stuff 👄👄

  • motorola e32 10 months ago

    @Rb2h tuntuntun

  • Boeing Model 247 10 months ago

    @Christiant2 Well, I'll wait for you.