The actual Lockheed Martin F/A-22 Raptor has a missile bay built into its fuselage, to preserve stealth and aerodynamics. It has no missiles on its wings. I'm not going to rate this airplane because I haven't downloaded it and I have integrity, but at the moment, I'd give it 3 stars. Also, get rid of the superscripted Wikipedia citations next time you c&p.
This is really impressive, to say the least. One detail: I ran it in Medium quality, and it started spinning wildly (the whole thing). Maybe weigh it down a bit?
@TheSoundOfLight My goal was to make a balanced plane that used turbofan engines. I accomplished it. Now I need to make a balanced plane that uses VTOL.
@TheSoundofLight Wait. What do you mean? What real reason?
I'm okay with him blocking me. It saves me the trouble of him shouting at me on Reddit, honestly. XD
@TheSoundofLight I wasn't bullying anyone. He was trying to report me for saying that you were overposting. He told me I was faking the proof.
And if I did say that, I'm sorry. But that doesn't give you the right to give my plane a 1-star rating in retaliation, because that is a low blow.
And hey, I never said your planes were bad planes. They're actually pretty good. You were just overposting, including 8 repaints of the same aircraft (of which I have proof). The only reason Awesomesage56 is after me is because he only saw the comments /after/ you deleted all those planes and changed your name.
@TheSoundofLight
@TheSoundofLight No, they're not. Check the stats. Different statistics for damn near everything, including number of parts, drag points, thrust to weight ratio, weight, wing size, et cetera.
@TheSoundOfLight I modified the plane several times, with clear differences between them. So no, I'm not spamming. And you have no right to judge me on posting two planes a day when you regularly posted more than 8.
Pretty good, but it doesn't take off on high physics. When starting from Final Approach, it works pretty well, except it's only fairly balanced and the roll is far too sensitive.
Not terribly balanced, but a good plane overall. There's a bit too much drag on it, which is why it shifts to one side while taking off. I'd also get rid of the wing in the center.
5 stars truly deserved. The only thing I noticed was that it lost control past 1250 mph, which could be solved by bringing the center of lift and center of mass closer together.
@Lucky13 I'm not sure. This is actually my first plane that flew perfectly the first time I tested it. One more version is coming up, and then I'm starting a new project!
I didn't want to rate this, because I felt that it wouldn't be fair to do so. It's an interesting assembly of parts, and a good start for a beginning plane creator. I admire the 3.9 thrust to weight ratio, but ultimately, there's too much drag on your plane to let it go very fast. Also, putting the engines on the wings greatly contributes to an imbalance of airflow, leading to unintentional roll and yaw.
722,055 feet. (: It's brilliant. Could use a couple adjustments though, which of course, I'm going to make.
When's your next plane coming out?
The actual Lockheed Martin F/A-22 Raptor has a missile bay built into its fuselage, to preserve stealth and aerodynamics. It has no missiles on its wings. I'm not going to rate this airplane because I haven't downloaded it and I have integrity, but at the moment, I'd give it 3 stars. Also, get rid of the superscripted Wikipedia citations next time you c&p.
This is really impressive, to say the least. One detail: I ran it in Medium quality, and it started spinning wildly (the whole thing). Maybe weigh it down a bit?
@TheSoundofLight Just uploaded it, it's a new version of my cargo plane, with more gas and a new feature.
@TheSoundOfLight My goal was to make a balanced plane that used turbofan engines. I accomplished it. Now I need to make a balanced plane that uses VTOL.
@TheSoundOfLight Thanks! It was a painstakingly difficult plane to build, but I think it was worth it.
Pretty good. I uploaded a modified version with better handling and balance.
Much better. Five stars. It's a bit heavy on the whiplash from maneuvering, but if I could give this plane a 5.5, I would. Great job.
@TheSoundofLight As do I.
@TheSoundofLight He just showed up a while later, that's all.
@TheSoundofLight Wait. What do you mean? What real reason? I'm okay with him blocking me. It saves me the trouble of him shouting at me on Reddit, honestly. XD
@TheSoundofLight I wasn't bullying anyone. He was trying to report me for saying that you were overposting. He told me I was faking the proof. And if I did say that, I'm sorry. But that doesn't give you the right to give my plane a 1-star rating in retaliation, because that is a low blow.
Nope. @TheSoundofLight. They do look similar, I'll admit, but have enough differences that people can tell them apart among close examination.
And hey, I never said your planes were bad planes. They're actually pretty good. You were just overposting, including 8 repaints of the same aircraft (of which I have proof). The only reason Awesomesage56 is after me is because he only saw the comments /after/ you deleted all those planes and changed your name. @TheSoundofLight
Huh. Never mind then. Nice plane. @Viper28
@TheSoundofLight No, they're not. Check the stats. Different statistics for damn near everything, including number of parts, drag points, thrust to weight ratio, weight, wing size, et cetera.
@Viper28 What Physics are you on?
@TheSoundOfLight I modified the plane several times, with clear differences between them. So no, I'm not spamming. And you have no right to judge me on posting two planes a day when you regularly posted more than 8.
Imbalance is the main problem. Besides that, the COT isn't close enough to the COM.
Pretty good, but it doesn't take off on high physics. When starting from Final Approach, it works pretty well, except it's only fairly balanced and the roll is far too sensitive.
@Jhawk1099 👌🏻.
Not terribly balanced, but a good plane overall. There's a bit too much drag on it, which is why it shifts to one side while taking off. I'd also get rid of the wing in the center.
5 stars truly deserved. The only thing I noticed was that it lost control past 1250 mph, which could be solved by bringing the center of lift and center of mass closer together.
@stampy I'm not going to give him a five-star rating for a plane that doesn't take off.
Maneuverable, but unbalanced. And it can't take off.
@Lucky13 I'm not sure. This is actually my first plane that flew perfectly the first time I tested it. One more version is coming up, and then I'm starting a new project!
I didn't want to rate this, because I felt that it wouldn't be fair to do so. It's an interesting assembly of parts, and a good start for a beginning plane creator. I admire the 3.9 thrust to weight ratio, but ultimately, there's too much drag on your plane to let it go very fast. Also, putting the engines on the wings greatly contributes to an imbalance of airflow, leading to unintentional roll and yaw.
@AndrewGarrison Thank you very much.
@Eric314 I forgot to add it because I was testing it in the Final Approach. I added it for the next version.