@Mastermind1941 Sure.
I think more detailed instructions on controls, and some short tutorials on critical flight phases (what to do on takeoff and landing etc). You can also add what makes your airliner stand out.
@Mastermind1941 nice
But I hate extreme controls XD
Funkytrees works on control surfaces now so you can make it smoother next time :)
Also pls read the rubric for descriptions; yours is lacking for my expectations.
It seems like you like my suggestions so here are some more: @Cabbage17
Embraer ERJ145 in 145 parts
Embraer E175 in 175 parts
MD-90 in 90 parts
Boeing model 1 in 1 part
Tu-95 in 95 parts
Airbus 350 in 350 parts
XD
@Cabbage17 Hmm... Maybe build a train. That would be fun.
BR class 378 Capitalstar in 378 parts?
Should be quite easy.
Also, build the Dash 8 Q300 in 300 parts.
@XAircraftManufacturer @JSwannyGaming148 @Eiro @Cabbage17 @2Papi2Chulo @airlinerbuilder @DPSAircraft
@PlaneFlightX
The challenge is ending in 24 hours if y'all are still interested, which I assume so as you have commented, upvoted, or both.
For @Cabbage17, maybe you can tick off some stuff on your list.
Hello @Mustangflyer, thanks for participating. Here is the evaluation for your build.
Performance - You even admit it yourself. But it still flies. 10/40
Innovation - Nice inlet. Also no engine pylons. 1/30
Design - using blocks for most of the fuselage isn't a good choice, especially for you as a silver user. You have kinda messed up with the blocks too, as some places aren't as smooth as desired. You also have this weird inlet. And the smallest wings. 10/25
Livery - the orange inlet looks nice. 5/5
Description - Well, you warned about the quality and handling of the plane. 10/20
Total: 36/120
Again, thank you. I thought more effort would be worth it.
One updoot.
Hi @Nash11, and thank you for participating. Here is the evaluation for your build.
Performance - The plane flies with an unnaturally small wings. I don't know what you did with XML modding, but this shouldn't really be the case. The plane is also very unstable, possibly for the same reason. 25/40
Innovation - Your plane has a lot of interesting elements, like the configuration of wings, engines, and landing gear etc, though some of these things may not be practical in real life. 25/30
Design - Practicality and realism is lacking. The nose and wing-mounted gear is also exposed even after retraction. 10/25
Livery - xml modding the fuel tank to change the fuel tank pattern looks pretty good. But this is still just a random bunch of colors 3/5
Description - you provide instructions for your only control, but when I slid VTOL down the wings were immediately destroyed. So much for your description. 6/20
Total:69/120
Once again, thank you for participating. You will receive 3 upvotes plus any you may receive for being on the podium.
Hello @Captaincarroca.
Thank you for participating.
Here is the evaluation for your entry:
Performance: The acceleration and top speed of your vehicle is too slow to be realistic. Some tanks can drive at speeds of 60mph or more. Also, aiming the cannon sideways can flip and destroy the vehicle. 25/40
Innovation: I like how you use the car engines as ammo storage in the rear, and how you use structural panels around the driver's seat. I would, however, like to see more features and interactive parts. 10/30
Design: Your tank looks nice, but, as aforementioned, more engine horsepower would be welcome. The driver is also a little too exposed and in the open. Aside from those (major) disadvantages, your tank would fare pretty well. 15/25
Livery: Nothing to say here. Maybe camouflage would look better. 4/5
Description: You just explain the naming of your build. Nothing else. 2/20
Total:
56/120
Thank you for participating. You will receive 3 upvotes plus any you receive for being on the podium.
@Eiro @JSwannyGaming148 No, no no!!
V/S is vertical speed, not v speeds. V-speeds are airspeeds that describe the specs and performing characteristics of a plane. As 'v-speeds' is plural, they refer to a series of specs of the aircraft. There are too many of them to explain, but wikipedia explains better than me and provide examples. They are collectively called v-speeds because they are designated V and a number/abbreviation.
Also, some of them are more important than others
If you are building an airplane, I suggest you list some or all of these for max points:
V1
V2
VFE for specific flap settings
VLE
VLO
VLOF
VMC
VNE
VR
VRef
VS
@XAircraftManufacturer At your request, the guidelines have been changed to include land vehicles and watercraft. Anything else and maybe the point system may also be changed but I don't want that to happen.
@JSwannyGaming148 But the short time limit is the whole point of this challenge. You can see the link above for the Airliner Challenge. Maybe it's more suitable for you.
@XAircraftManufacturer oh and you can hide an extra layer of wings inside the wings. to ensure max lift, you can change it to Flat bottom. That usually works.
@XAircraftManufacturer As much as a hollow fuselage seems hollow, it isn't to the game's physics engine. You don't need more thrust, you just need set calculateDrag to false for the fuselage pieces surrounding the engines so they can get air.
I read this before @DPSAircraft
But I don’t have enough time and commitment
I’m a full time student here, even during currently unprecedented times XD
PS were still stuck at home here in the US
@Imsomeone you make a subassembly for your plane, download this, delete all but the cockpit, paste in the subassembly, put in the cockpit of your choice, then set your new cockpit as primary, and upload etc.
@BnanaX Serious disappointment
Sure, the landing gear has problems sometimes.
Please, offer me some constructive critiques if you want to criticize. Just saying it’s bad does nothing but make me sad.
@FireFast212 Sorry about that. I did think it was bullying, but I give my apology as the rules were unclear. Please do include a clear definition of this though to prevent any confusion in the future. Thank you so much! :)
@FireFast212 Please tell me then, what is "new"? You just said "no reposts". This is certainly not a repost, as my previous (work in progress!) build is obviously different. I still spent a lot of time on it. Even if everything is the same (which it isn't), I still went through some degree of effort repainting the whole thing. Not that I'm going to do anything about it, but do make it clear about what is new and what isn't please. After all, there is still only a certain number of parts in SP, so nothing can completely be unique. Plus, my airliner is still a work in progress.
And about the wing pieces, they have abysmal drag already; it’d be unwise to make it thicker @DPSAircraft
About the small fuselage, this is supposed to be a regional jet. For its dimensions, it very closely matches the CRJ1000.
It’s called pitch down??? @DPSAircraft
I’m very confused
EDIT: of course there is a technical name for it. But I don’t know. Either way the result is the plane pitching up.
@Mastermind1941 Sure.
I think more detailed instructions on controls, and some short tutorials on critical flight phases (what to do on takeoff and landing etc). You can also add what makes your airliner stand out.
@Mastermind1941 nice
But I hate extreme controls XD
Funkytrees works on control surfaces now so you can make it smoother next time :)
Also pls read the rubric for descriptions; yours is lacking for my expectations.
Thank you so much! @Wallaby
And you forgot to change your name on the list
You’re still @ForeverPie
@XAircraftManufacturer As an idea, maybe build a Cessna caravan
At least I think it’s simple :)
Sorry then @Cabbage17
+1It seems like you like my suggestions so here are some more: @Cabbage17
+1Embraer ERJ145 in 145 parts
Embraer E175 in 175 parts
MD-90 in 90 parts
Boeing model 1 in 1 part
Tu-95 in 95 parts
Airbus 350 in 350 parts
XD
The train is box-shaped so it should be somewhat easy :) @Cabbage17
+1Boeing clipper in 314 parts @Cabbage17
+1(it's model 314)
@Cabbage17 Hmm... Maybe build a train. That would be fun.
+1BR class 378 Capitalstar in 378 parts?
Should be quite easy.
Also, build the Dash 8 Q300 in 300 parts.
@XAircraftManufacturer @JSwannyGaming148 @Eiro @Cabbage17 @2Papi2Chulo @airlinerbuilder @DPSAircraft
@PlaneFlightX
The challenge is ending in 24 hours if y'all are still interested, which I assume so as you have commented, upvoted, or both.
For @Cabbage17, maybe you can tick off some stuff on your list.
@Cabbage17 Cessna 172 in 172 parts
+1Cessna 208 in 208 parts
Diamond DA40 in 40 parts
G300 glass cockpit in 300 parts
But the Valkyrie is a real experimental bomber @Thecatbaron
wikipedia
@Cabbage17
+1A220 in 220 parts?
A318 in 318 parts?
Just asking
Tag me if you build it
@DafaARK that’s fine as long as you don’t make any changes (you kinda can but as long as it’s under 3hr total)
@Mustangflyer Your score of
+136/120places you in 3rd place as of now.@Nash11 Its fine. I hope you did your best. Your current score of
69/120places you in 1st place (!) as of now.Current Rankings:
69/120I did the challenge by @Nash1156/120Panzerzerstörer 300 by @Captaincarroca36/120speed build challenge entrie by @MustangflyerEDIT: I thought you guys would put more effort into this.
Hello @Mustangflyer, thanks for participating. Here is the evaluation for your build.
Performance - You even admit it yourself. But it still flies.
10/40Innovation - Nice inlet. Also no engine pylons.
1/30Design - using blocks for most of the fuselage isn't a good choice, especially for you as a silver user. You have kinda messed up with the blocks too, as some places aren't as smooth as desired. You also have this weird inlet. And the smallest wings.
10/25Livery - the orange inlet looks nice.
5/5Description - Well, you warned about the quality and handling of the plane.
10/20Total:
36/120Again, thank you. I thought more effort would be worth it.
+1One updoot.
Hi @Nash11, and thank you for participating. Here is the evaluation for your build.
Performance - The plane flies with an unnaturally small wings. I don't know what you did with XML modding, but this shouldn't really be the case. The plane is also very unstable, possibly for the same reason.
25/40Innovation - Your plane has a lot of interesting elements, like the configuration of wings, engines, and landing gear etc, though some of these things may not be practical in real life.
25/30Design - Practicality and realism is lacking. The nose and wing-mounted gear is also exposed even after retraction.
10/25Livery - xml modding the fuel tank to change the fuel tank pattern looks pretty good. But this is still just a random bunch of colors
3/5Description - you provide instructions for your only control, but when I slid VTOL down the wings were immediately destroyed. So much for your description.
6/20Total:
69/120Once again, thank you for participating. You will receive 3 upvotes plus any you may receive for being on the podium.
Hello @Captaincarroca.
Thank you for participating.
Here is the evaluation for your entry:
Performance: The acceleration and top speed of your vehicle is too slow to be realistic. Some tanks can drive at speeds of 60mph or more. Also, aiming the cannon sideways can flip and destroy the vehicle.
25/40Innovation: I like how you use the car engines as ammo storage in the rear, and how you use structural panels around the driver's seat. I would, however, like to see more features and interactive parts.
10/30Design: Your tank looks nice, but, as aforementioned, more engine horsepower would be welcome. The driver is also a little too exposed and in the open. Aside from those (major) disadvantages, your tank would fare pretty well.
15/25Livery: Nothing to say here. Maybe camouflage would look better.
4/5Description: You just explain the naming of your build. Nothing else.
2/20Total:
56/120Thank you for participating. You will receive 3 upvotes plus any you receive for being on the podium.
Nice
T
@Eiro @JSwannyGaming148 No, no no!!
V/S is vertical speed, not v speeds. V-speeds are airspeeds that describe the specs and performing characteristics of a plane. As 'v-speeds' is plural, they refer to a series of specs of the aircraft. There are too many of them to explain, but wikipedia explains better than me and provide examples. They are collectively called v-speeds because they are designated V and a number/abbreviation.
Also, some of them are more important than others
If you are building an airplane, I suggest you list some or all of these for max points:
V1
V2
VFE for specific flap settings
VLE
VLO
VLOF
VMC
VNE
VR
VRef
VS
@JSwannyGaming148 Oh then there is no way for me to help you XD
@XAircraftManufacturer At your request, the guidelines have been changed to include land vehicles and watercraft. Anything else and maybe the point system may also be changed but I don't want that to happen.
@JSwannyGaming148 But the short time limit is the whole point of this challenge. You can see the link above for the Airliner Challenge. Maybe it's more suitable for you.
@XAircraftManufacturer
@DPSAircraft
I mean maybe yours wings are too small as 150mph should do for a plane this size @Imsomeone
But props don't rotate at 300mph... @Imsomeone
@XAircraftManufacturer oh and you can hide an extra layer of wings inside the wings. to ensure max lift, you can change it to Flat bottom. That usually works.
+1@XAircraftManufacturer As much as a hollow fuselage seems hollow, it isn't to the game's physics engine. You don't need more thrust, you just need set
+1calculateDragtofalsefor the fuselage pieces surrounding the engines so they can get air.The deadline has now been extended to 9/14 At 12pm UTC.
You can convert this time to your respective time zones.
No exceptions will be made.
@DPSAircraft
I will think about it.
Oh sorry @Cabbage17
+1Didn’t see that
Wow
+1Please put me on the list for student pilot @Wallaby
Airplane single-engine land, (basically fixed wing, single engine). I fly a C172
Please make an F-35 in 35 parts @Cabbage17
XD
I read this before @DPSAircraft
But I don’t have enough time and commitment
I’m a full time student here, even during currently unprecedented times XD
PS were still stuck at home here in the US
Wow! @DPSAircraft
Should I extend the deadline? I honestly don’t know how long it takes you guys to build stuff XD
@Imsomeone you make a subassembly for your plane, download this, delete all but the cockpit, paste in the subassembly, put in the cockpit of your choice, then set your new cockpit as primary, and upload etc.
@BnanaX Serious disappointment
Sure, the landing gear has problems sometimes.
Please, offer me some constructive critiques if you want to criticize. Just saying it’s bad does nothing but make me sad.
@DPSAircraft @BnanaX
+1@WarshipDude Oh.
@FireFast212 Sorry about that. I did think it was bullying, but I give my apology as the rules were unclear. Please do include a clear definition of this though to prevent any confusion in the future. Thank you so much! :)
@FireFast212 You shouldn't just bully people around with an unclear definition.
@FireFast212 Please tell me then, what is "new"? You just said "no reposts". This is certainly not a repost, as my previous (work in progress!) build is obviously different. I still spent a lot of time on it. Even if everything is the same (which it isn't), I still went through some degree of effort repainting the whole thing. Not that I'm going to do anything about it, but do make it clear about what is new and what isn't please. After all, there is still only a certain number of parts in SP, so nothing can completely be unique. Plus, my airliner is still a work in progress.
T
And about the wing pieces, they have abysmal drag already; it’d be unwise to make it thicker @DPSAircraft
About the small fuselage, this is supposed to be a regional jet. For its dimensions, it very closely matches the CRJ1000.
It’s called pitch down??? @DPSAircraft
I’m very confused
EDIT: of course there is a technical name for it. But I don’t know. Either way the result is the plane pitching up.
Thanks @F104Deathtrap