@Seeras @Skua
@Hexcorp has copied yet another user's aircraft. It has been REPORTED several times but alas, it has not been taken down. This is the third aircraft they have copied. Thanks
@mikoyanster
You may use other builder's aircraft/vehicles if:
*You don't circumvent the successor system
*Credit is given to the original builder (successor is sufficient)
*You make some meaningful change to the original design (adding guns or changing the paint is not a meaningful alteration)
@CALVIN232
@CALVIN232
How to circumvent the successor sytem:
Remove the cockpit, save the rest of the aircraft as a custom part, load new aircraft and attach the new cockpit to the 'custom part', save aircraft.
This will not register as a successor. It's BS.
@CALVIN232
How are you misunderstanding my comments? Hexcorp clearly copied you aircraft. I couldn't make it more clear? Nobody is saying YOU copied anything as you clearly made changes to the aircraft and gave credit to the originator. Relax.
You can't be this dense. You really thought you could take another one of @CALVIN232 aircraft and claim it's your own? Rediculous!
Mods, this aircraft was, once again, stolen from CALVIN232. And once again @Hexcorp circumvented the successor system and claimed it was their own. Please remove the post and caution Hexcorp about the possibility of getting banned for continuous disregard for the stated rules. Thanks.
@Seeras @Skua
@Hexcorp
The fact that you weren't banned for circumventing the successor system is beyond me. At least @CALVIN232 gave credit to the original builder and made significant improvement; he also didn't claim it was his "first aircraft" even though it was someone else's build. There is no winning this argument for you, just don't do it again and all is good.
@CALVIN232
Just for the record. I wasn't saying you copied an aircraft, I was making a statement to the Mods (whom I tagged in my comment) that @Hexcorp clearly stole your work and circumvented the successor sytem. If you make a statement of theft and tag a Mod or two, they will pull the post down faster than just reporting it. Cursing gets you nowhere and talking with the thief is just going to piss you off more. The post has been taken down so no worries. Your builds are awesome, keep it up.
@Derrick980
@CALVIN232
Just for the record. I wasn't saying you copied an aircraft, I was making a statement to the Mods (whom I tagged in my comment) that @Hexcorp clearly stole your work and circumvented the successor sytem. If you make a statement of theft and tag a Mod or two, they will pull the post down faster than just reporting it. Cursing gets you nowhere and talking with the thief is just going to piss you off more. The post has been taken down so no worries. Your builds are awesome, keep it up.
@Derrick980
@CALVIN232
I wasn't saying you copied, I was making a statement to the Mods, whom I also tagged in the comment. This is clearly a theft of your aircraft; and the guy is still denying it as if it isn't obvious. I find that tagging a Mod or two in my statement of theft helps to correct the problem faster than exchanging comments with the thief or cursing, especially when they deny it.
@CALVIN232
Take it easy on the cursing, that won't get you anywhere.
This is a copied aircraft and should be removed. The user also circumvented the successor system which should be a bannable offence. Thanks.
@Seeras @Cedy117 @Skua
@Bluerobot11
No worries, both words have similar origins, but very different meanings now days. To the best of my knowledge, the NATO designation was givin due to the fact that the aircraft resembled a lit cigarette with its red nose intake. No harm done. Cheers!
Look up the actual NATO designation name and re-upload w/ new title. Your aircraft name is unexceptable unless hate speach is your intent.
@Seeras @Skua @TheLatentImage
@Treadmill103
Yes, she's a quick one. I was actually surprised at how stable the aircraft is at speed; even at or just above sea level. I couldn't figure out a landing gear system that could handle a 500mph touchdown.
@ChiChiWerx
Nice! That's well into the thermosphere and about 20km (65,000ft) short of low earth orbit (LEO). I'm thinking about making a challenge out of this build.
This is unacceptable. Yet another copied aircraft and this time @airplainebomberdude10 is actually claiming to be the original creator. Please remove.
@Seeras @Cedy117
Can we please have this copied aircraft removed?
@Seeras @Cedy117
This is a blatant copy of @SUPERSAMROCK aircraft. Reported.
Fine Tuner Mod
@Seeras @Skua
@Hexcorp has copied yet another user's aircraft. It has been REPORTED several times but alas, it has not been taken down. This is the third aircraft they have copied. Thanks
@mikoyanster
You may use other builder's aircraft/vehicles if:
*You don't circumvent the successor system
*Credit is given to the original builder (successor is sufficient)
*You make some meaningful change to the original design (adding guns or changing the paint is not a meaningful alteration)
@CALVIN232
@Pilotmario
Ouch
@CALVIN232
How to circumvent the successor sytem:
Remove the cockpit, save the rest of the aircraft as a custom part, load new aircraft and attach the new cockpit to the 'custom part', save aircraft.
This will not register as a successor. It's BS.
@CALVIN232
How are you misunderstanding my comments? Hexcorp clearly copied you aircraft. I couldn't make it more clear? Nobody is saying YOU copied anything as you clearly made changes to the aircraft and gave credit to the originator. Relax.
@CALVIN232 @Derrick980
I guarantee they stole it from someone.
You can't be this dense. You really thought you could take another one of @CALVIN232 aircraft and claim it's your own? Rediculous!
Mods, this aircraft was, once again, stolen from CALVIN232. And once again @Hexcorp circumvented the successor system and claimed it was their own. Please remove the post and caution Hexcorp about the possibility of getting banned for continuous disregard for the stated rules. Thanks.
@Seeras @Skua
@Hexcorp
The fact that you weren't banned for circumventing the successor system is beyond me. At least @CALVIN232 gave credit to the original builder and made significant improvement; he also didn't claim it was his "first aircraft" even though it was someone else's build. There is no winning this argument for you, just don't do it again and all is good.
No more than 250 parts, now we're talkin'. ;)
No less than 250 parts? Pass.
@Hexcorp
Might want to make sure it's an original this time.
@CALVIN232
Just for the record. I wasn't saying you copied an aircraft, I was making a statement to the Mods (whom I tagged in my comment) that @Hexcorp clearly stole your work and circumvented the successor sytem. If you make a statement of theft and tag a Mod or two, they will pull the post down faster than just reporting it. Cursing gets you nowhere and talking with the thief is just going to piss you off more. The post has been taken down so no worries. Your builds are awesome, keep it up.
@Derrick980
@CALVIN232
Just for the record. I wasn't saying you copied an aircraft, I was making a statement to the Mods (whom I tagged in my comment) that @Hexcorp clearly stole your work and circumvented the successor sytem. If you make a statement of theft and tag a Mod or two, they will pull the post down faster than just reporting it. Cursing gets you nowhere and talking with the thief is just going to piss you off more. The post has been taken down so no worries. Your builds are awesome, keep it up.
@Derrick980
@CALVIN232
I wasn't saying you copied, I was making a statement to the Mods, whom I also tagged in the comment. This is clearly a theft of your aircraft; and the guy is still denying it as if it isn't obvious. I find that tagging a Mod or two in my statement of theft helps to correct the problem faster than exchanging comments with the thief or cursing, especially when they deny it.
@CALVIN232
Take it easy on the cursing, that won't get you anywhere.
This is a copied aircraft and should be removed. The user also circumvented the successor system which should be a bannable offence. Thanks.
@Seeras @Cedy117 @Skua
@Ginco10
Agreed. Just wanted to be sure there were no misinterpretations.
@TheLatentImage
Thank you! I'm sure no harm was intended, but that's not always everone's interpretation.
@Bluerobot11
No worries, both words have similar origins, but very different meanings now days. To the best of my knowledge, the NATO designation was givin due to the fact that the aircraft resembled a lit cigarette with its red nose intake. No harm done. Cheers!
Look up the actual NATO designation name and re-upload w/ new title. Your aircraft name is unexceptable unless hate speach is your intent.
@Seeras @Skua @TheLatentImage
@Liquidfox
Thanks, it was a challenge to build.
@Treadmill103
Thank you.
Thanks to @SerialVapist for the idea.
@Stingray
Thank you!
Great build! I'm going to be playing with this concept now. Very innovative.
@Crypt0
Thanks!
BRILLIANT!! Amazing work by everyone.
Considering your portfolio of awesome aircraft designs... ummmm no.
@Treadmill103
Thanks
Great design! Unfortunately my tablet would self destruct if I downloaded and attempted to fly it.
@Treadmill103
Yes, she's a quick one. I was actually surprised at how stable the aircraft is at speed; even at or just above sea level. I couldn't figure out a landing gear system that could handle a 500mph touchdown.
@oDDDynamics
Thanks. I built the plane around the engine modules. The new update and intakes are really cool.
@spefyjerbf
Awesome, thanks for the support!
@ChiChiWerx
Nice! That's well into the thermosphere and about 20km (65,000ft) short of low earth orbit (LEO). I'm thinking about making a challenge out of this build.
@ChiChiWerx
Deactivate AG3
@Sarpanitu
Common courtsy makes me happy ;)
It is an awesome cockpit build BTWs.
It's always a good idea to credit any builders' work you are using. I.E. thanks for the awesome cockpit @Sarpanitu
This is a copy and should be removed.
@Cedy117 @Seeras @Skua
Great build!
This is a copying of another player's aircraft and should be removed. Reported.
@Seeras @Skua
@SteadfastContracting
Thank you!
@spefyjerbf
Thank you, I appreciate the Spotlight.
@rubbishcraft
Thanks!
@Clawsome
Well done. Not sure why your post didn't get the same attention.
I don't usually upvote aircraft without descriptions, but this one is pretty cool. Keep 'em comming.
@ForeverPie
Thanks mate.
The 'Formania Gunship'. Nice