COM doesn't have to be completely in the middle, thats probably your problem. Try shifting the main wings backwards, or if its not possible (replica) try stacking the horizontal stabilizers
@1342791782 sure, although there's a lot of part clipping going on which adds unnecessary polygons. You may take the model into blender and remove those to make it easier on the performance. (also to animate the rotation lol)
AI and map update. Should've already been done waaaay before. It's nice that we have new weapons and parts and xml properties, but it's just a very shortlived distraction from the fact how extremely stale the default map is.
Basically, 1.10 should be the User Voice update (except multiplayer, that's a whole different beast);
Proper clouds
Smoke and condensation trails
More map props
AI overhaul
Actual weather (not just a phantom force called "wind", let us see the raindrops, make the runways slippery, ...)
@504799 @Sm10684
Even though it was obvious just by looking, I wanted to give this vehicle the benefit of the doubt.
But, indeed, I am fairly certain that this creation and its predecessor are heavily based on Sm10684's post.
Many of the hex color codes are the same, the rear gears are picture perfect copies of each other, and many of the part ID patterns are the same.
Therefore, 504799, you have been officially put on the not cash money list.
@X99STRIKER at least four
<electronic warfare>
+3asteroid boob hah a
@Red0Bulll no they removed it a while back for being too political regarding the topic of sodium prices in Nicaragua
+1ᴼʷᴼ
@TheUnsinkableSam no
@NexusGaming where do you think I've been all this time
@Kenneth_ nah that's overrated
@AsteroidAsteroidTheBook congrats! btw just to confirm, were you on MP yesterday?
@KnightOfRen ah yes, videogame drama lol
@CenturyAerospace oh thats cool
germancorsair?
@tsampoy @T8flightcrafts
they have been ruined by imgur
@NexusGaming yes that's Him
+1that sucks
@lianken infinitely long, since I no longer have the source files for unity
@Panzerfaust2121 thanks, I don't remember having any issues with it, maybe some update broke it
i'll try flying it around myself
i no longer have the unity files, and back when i made this i was unable to export for android
@Numbers that's also how you get disqualified lol
how do you always manage to make me so uncomfortable yet hypnotized
@ErickvCamilo yes you can, you can edit any line that I specified in the rules, which does include FT
+2adds a lot of work for minimal payoff
+1COM doesn't have to be completely in the middle, thats probably your problem. Try shifting the main wings backwards, or if its not possible (replica) try stacking the horizontal stabilizers
lm don'r unsrstand how itd work how when sun circele earth. Ho wccome plant can go around other olanet
can u pls do mine next?
+4it's five guns, I just can't count
@Numbers
@belugasub I think that my PC could handle only about three parts more before giving up at that point
@Someguythatlikesplanes 4 flares in a single dispenser. Use the one provided in the post, it's already set up
@1342791782 sure, although there's a lot of part clipping going on which adds unnecessary polygons. You may take the model into blender and remove those to make it easier on the performance. (also to animate the rotation lol)
@Strikefighter04 they needed it the most
+1@SuperVirus38 scaling isn't allowed, sry m8
here
+4AI and map update. Should've already been done waaaay before. It's nice that we have new weapons and parts and xml properties, but it's just a very shortlived distraction from the fact how extremely stale the default map is.
+2Basically, 1.10 should be the User Voice update (except multiplayer, that's a whole different beast);
@Wi1dSk7 yes it is, it is basically a part of vanilla
+1@Brendorkus of course
@Potkuri they don't disappear here
+1@asteroidbook345 it's only for the best
@Numbers you can have only one
@JAVLARVAFAN you can't either. Min and max inputs can affect the performance of some parts
@Randomdoggo weird, I'll check it out one I get on my PC
@Liensis use vanilla, it's not that difficult to get it very close to the limit
@Random40 sure, I forgot to mention the entry limit. (2)
@FranzPeterSiegfried no, sorry.
@Thueerra nope
@Davidzhang2671 I'm fine with it as long as credit is given. This is straight up circumventing the auto-credit system
@504799 @Sm10684
Even though it was obvious just by looking, I wanted to give this vehicle the benefit of the doubt.
But, indeed, I am fairly certain that this creation and its predecessor are heavily based on Sm10684's post.
Many of the hex color codes are the same, the rear gears are picture perfect copies of each other, and many of the part ID patterns are the same.
Therefore, 504799, you have been officially put on the not cash money list.
@504799 @Sm10684
I smeel d r a m a I shall start the judging process
I will report back in few minutes