Well...
Looks: 1/10- its just ugly with all those womgs, slrry
Speed: 3/10- the car kept lifting off and sliding off the track, so it was really hard to get over 275.
Total: 4/20. Heh.
Looks: 7/10- it looks like a car, it feels like a car!
Speed: 7/10- Acceleration was very quick, but the top speed is very low.
Total: 14/20- A very fun little car! Great work!
@Awsomur chilllll.. but I'm on ur side xD
Apple tends to make products that have higher part count and graphical abilities (GASP, AN ANDROID GUY SAID IT) compared to say, LG or a Dell or HP (iPhone and mac pro) but their modding policy puts a damper on the potential of the device.
@Minecraftpoweer well...
Looks: 3/10- funny, but that's the only good thing about the body xD
Speed: 4/10- it's a bit slow, but not too bad... xD
Total: 7/20
@Awsomur ok :) ebay has one for $375, but it seems steep. Does it have an hdmi out? Im running my computer into apple's 5k monitor and i dont wanna give that up lol
My grade:
Looks: 8/10- the back end is a bit wide, but the opening engine bay is mega-cool and it's got some good aero pieces. -1pt for no windscreen
Speed: 6/10- relatively slow to accelerate, using the active downforce really made slower in a straight shot, and the torque steer made it almost undriveable at times. I did hit 427mph tho without your turbo system, which seems to be jets, so those don't get used.
Total: 14/20- a very good concept with steering issues, speed could've been better. Great job though!
My grade:
Looks: 6/10- very racy, and the dual functioning spoiler is AWESOME! The front end could use some work tho :)
Speed: 8/10 a little slow to accelerate, but very good top speed.
Total: 14/20- the body could use some work, but the speed was well above average. Great work!
Well...
Looks: 1/10- its just ugly with all those womgs, slrry
Speed: 3/10- the car kept lifting off and sliding off the track, so it was really hard to get over 275.
Total: 4/20. Heh.
@Iamsilverdahedgie americans write the date a weird way lol
Yes im american xD
Petrol. Faster cars, higher rpms
@SledDriver ohhhhh cool ok
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
xD this is cool!
@Awsomur wait, bluetooth controller? Like what?
@chancey21 IKR!
@Iamsilverdahedgie oh ok lol
@Patrick20206 tag meh pls, im free now xD
@Iamsilverdahedgie sure seems like it.
@Awsomur didn't know about apple tv lol.
@SledDriver oh I meant in the other pictures, or is that in skybox too?
@RailfanEthan oh okay
@EpicPigster1 I think my city uses a no-name company that's on commission lol
@Strikefighter04 it's great on a 160" tv xD
I usually believe less detail is more, except in the case of TSAD, and this plane proves my point! Great looking without being too busy!
@RailfanEthan LOL
@SledDriver amazing as usual! Also, what's your backround?
That doesn't mean you should reupload it
Overload, multiplayer, smoke trails, and fine tuner
Probably impossible
@RailfanEthan huh. I was looking into getting an ipad. Are there any performance differences between the regular ipad and the mini?
Looks: 7/10- it looks like a car, it feels like a car!
Speed: 7/10- Acceleration was very quick, but the top speed is very low.
Total: 14/20- A very fun little car! Great work!
Very fun!
@AndrewGarrison
@RailfanEthan what @QuantausAviation said. And hes been gone for over 2 years
@Mattangi ill try it
@RailfanEthan holy jesus! What device did you use for that?!
I'd like to see something just by you :)
@Awsomur chilllll.. but I'm on ur side xD
Apple tends to make products that have higher part count and graphical abilities (GASP, AN ANDROID GUY SAID IT) compared to say, LG or a Dell or HP (iPhone and mac pro) but their modding policy puts a damper on the potential of the device.
@Mattangi ok
@Mattangi too high
@Mattangi well you're technically disqualified if I can't run it lol
@Mattangi xml and overload modes parts are allowd, and my tablet doesn't do well over 400, so that's the reason for the rule
You could do it with 7
@Mattangi yeah, since interior isnt counted, you don't need detail there
@SAC923 I knowwww it's not fair lol
Maybe add health with overload?
@Mattangi I'd like an original design, but if you can recreate an existing car and do it well, I'll accept it.
@Minecraftpoweer well...
Looks: 3/10- funny, but that's the only good thing about the body xD
Speed: 4/10- it's a bit slow, but not too bad... xD
Total: 7/20
@Iamaducklol sorry, been super busy
@Minecraftpoweer sure
@GhostHTX lol
@GhostHTX lol ok
@Awsomur ok :) ebay has one for $375, but it seems steep. Does it have an hdmi out? Im running my computer into apple's 5k monitor and i dont wanna give that up lol
@Awsomur how many parts(ish) can yours run?
Maybe I should look into one... Had to get a refund on steam cause my computer just cant run it... Oh well lol
My grade:
Looks: 8/10- the back end is a bit wide, but the opening engine bay is mega-cool and it's got some good aero pieces. -1pt for no windscreen
Speed: 6/10- relatively slow to accelerate, using the active downforce really made slower in a straight shot, and the torque steer made it almost undriveable at times. I did hit 427mph tho without your turbo system, which seems to be jets, so those don't get used.
Total: 14/20- a very good concept with steering issues, speed could've been better. Great job though!
One question... what makes up the turbo system?
My grade:
Looks: 6/10- very racy, and the dual functioning spoiler is AWESOME! The front end could use some work tho :)
Speed: 8/10 a little slow to accelerate, but very good top speed.
Total: 14/20- the body could use some work, but the speed was well above average. Great work!
No offense to the original one, but this looks much more refined :D
@chancey21 all in one go? XD