My friend, as a Host of the challenge, this is absolutely amazing. I appreciate the realism; Although I have one gripe.
The camera is a bit high up in the interior. I put it to -0.05 and it looked fine. This is a very fun aircraft to fly.
Performance cost is an attempt to measure the computational intensity of a craft in terms of straight blocks. For example, if a craft has a performance cost of 500, then you might expect it to affect framerate about the same as a craft that was made of 500 straight blocks. It's still very much just an estimate, but hopefully, it is a better estimate than part count.
Each part type has a constant performance cost associated with it. Some part types have an additional cost depending on their settings. For example, wings will have more performance cost if they are larger because that requires more sections of wing physics. Bladed engines have additional cost with each blade. Labels cost more if they use expressions.
T
I’m on crap Wi-Fi so I’ll get this fast o7
+1T
T
I love when people make these planes soley to call them “Fagot”.
+2Damn! Nice.
+1Kashin waves!
+1T please
It’s a paint job I threw together in a rush to get it released. Mainly based on that aircraft however, yes. @MrShenanigans
What the actual fuck this is literally just my build recolored
Hey I was the updoot that got you to plat yayy
+1Fo sho get in my dms @Focks
fest updood
fastest updoot in the west
+2Very nice.
Can I have free version for test?!?!?! I will no do other thing besides test!1!1!1!!1!!1!!!1!! Promise!!!
Hmmm. Wonder who actually made this.
No, it’s been named that since the game released. @BRUHMELLA
Too chodey to be a 7.62. And at that, what type of 7.62? 7.62x39? 7.62x54? 7.62x94? 7.62 NATO?
T
+1My friend, as a Host of the challenge, this is absolutely amazing. I appreciate the realism; Although I have one gripe.
The camera is a bit high up in the interior. I put it to -0.05 and it looked fine. This is a very fun aircraft to fly.
I now want to die.
Smol pp @WiiMini
+2You mean, uh, Default4 lol
The plane you just built is a foxbat, like this one @WhyBreadSoFattning
T
+1I don't know why people call this plane ugly I actually think it looks pretty good
+2Great build! could you possibly make an Me-163 soon?
Yes it was
+1T
wait what
@Garfield
YES THANK YOU
+2Ik I asked for 262 but im assuming you're gonna make it in the future
T
@Alvin784 thx
I will gloriously grunt "ANDREW" while doing squats at my local gym while wearing the Tank Top. Thank you.
+4cringe my guy
+1Ayyy he be Plat
+1Thanks for T
+2@jamesPLANESii lol nice
james did you curate your own plane
T
+2We need a slding option for the canopy, I don't like how it can only open vertically.
Boujie
We have a new vertigo now :)
+5t
+1@Vincent to*
+1@meteorbook345 bobgandx moment
@meteorbook345 Yes
Performance cost is an attempt to measure the computational intensity of a craft in terms of straight blocks. For example, if a craft has a performance cost of 500, then you might expect it to affect framerate about the same as a craft that was made of 500 straight blocks. It's still very much just an estimate, but hopefully, it is a better estimate than part count.
Each part type has a constant performance cost associated with it. Some part types have an additional cost depending on their settings. For example, wings will have more performance cost if they are larger because that requires more sections of wing physics. Bladed engines have additional cost with each blade. Labels cost more if they use expressions.
+3t