@Brields95 They're all "legit", but are they all garbage and a clear degradation and dare I say insult of my work? Yes they are. It doesn't matter anyway because their knock off is not an indicator to my original builds quality.
@randomusername Ok you're not the only one to have people make crappy successors of your builds. The difference in this situation is you let it get to you and acted out, which is what some people wanted. You have to either roll with it or not care at all, getting pissed off is absolutely the worst thing to do in these situations. Just because someone made a knock off of your build, that isn't indicative of that posts "quality". This happens to literally everybody on the site with a shred of attention.
Even though you say your English is bad, I cannot understand how you managed to type "English" with an Asian accent and autocorrect didn't try to stop you at all.
I don't think I remember the last time an off road vehicle had suspension as smooth and buttery as this, really does feel like a trophy truck, besides the massive scale lol.
Looks great, the cockpit is really well done. However it turns a bit too well I believe, and with the negative mass, the orbit camera is in a really odd and rather uncomfortable position. In the future I think you should try to build with lighter mass blocks from the start instead of decreasing weight later, or at least attach an orbit camera in the body to have a normal orbit view.
@F4f879 Glad you like mine hahaha, and that's good. If you get the flight characteristics just right as well, your attempt will be a lot better than mine :)
Wow looks great, I made an attempt at it a while ago but I messed up the fight characteristics, I had a fixed version here. Your cockpit is much better than my pretty basic interior but I think you could make the cables on the wings about half as thick. And IIRC I'm pretty sure the S.E.5.A's armament consisted of a Vickers mounted on the left side partially recessed into the body and a Lewis on top of the wing? Having two Lewis guns mounted like that seems a bit odd
@SimplyPlain well I genuinely do think you did a very nice job with the shape of the aircraft :). So I wasn't just trying to flatter you for an ulterior motive :)
Wow really good job with the body shape and the wings. Would you mind if I potentially use your P-47 in a few screenshots? I'm building a P-38J and I think it'd look really cool to have it, my P-51C and your P-47 all lined up :)
People should just understand that this is a child that can't take a hint, and should stop caring and fighting him in the comments. One day people will stop caring about this and that's the day this kid will fade back into obscurity.
@LuftwaffeAce262 I.... know that I'm in highschool math... I'm talking about the P-51 designation, I accidentally named it that instead of F-82... P-51 is the single fuselage Mustang.
Dllama: Makes 10 teasers, doesn't upload.
+1@MrSilverWolf I see no problems with that, liquids put out fires... right?
+3@thefalkenreich @belugasub Enough, you're starting to cross the point into tasteless insulting. I won't accomplish anything at all.
+1@BlackhattAircraft They're truly something lol
+1@bjac0 Right??? Literally less than 10m apart and we had no clue hahahaha
+1@Brields95 They're all "legit", but are they all garbage and a clear degradation and dare I say insult of my work? Yes they are. It doesn't matter anyway because their knock off is not an indicator to my original builds quality.
+1@randomusername Ok, whatever then. You do you
@randomusername Ok you're not the only one to have people make crappy successors of your builds. The difference in this situation is you let it get to you and acted out, which is what some people wanted. You have to either roll with it or not care at all, getting pissed off is absolutely the worst thing to do in these situations. Just because someone made a knock off of your build, that isn't indicative of that posts "quality". This happens to literally everybody on the site with a shred of attention.
Here's some examples:
+3This one
And this one
This one too
Another one
Yet another one
@goboygo1 thanks man :T
@goboygo1 Nice! Congrats man
@JamesBleriot I don't do that stuff so you'll just have to follow or stay tuned :)
@ProcessedPlAnEs P-38J-15 yes
@CRJ900Pilot true, I thought I was revealing too much with the canopy frame and fuselage curve.
@BogdanX oh true I might change that then
@Subnerdica yeah that's a 100% legit in game decal.
@Subnerdica yes, that was very much my intention 100% ;)
+1@BogdanX I just didn't want to add too many parts making a spade and etc :(
@CRJ900Pilot Crap, I made it too easy?
@Gameboi14 He's... literally right
looks neato dude
@Gameboi14 Right, your mom called you to bed over an hour ago :)
+1Wow that's a weird looking Honda Civic but alright.
Damn I was already making one lol, good job though!
Snowbirds :)
+2How in the fresh f*ck was this based on my Wyvern???
+4Even though you say your English is bad, I cannot understand how you managed to type "English" with an Asian accent and autocorrect didn't try to stop you at all.
+8An Old Republic ship, with TIE Fighters?
cool
+2I don't think I remember the last time an off road vehicle had suspension as smooth and buttery as this, really does feel like a trophy truck, besides the massive scale lol.
Wow.
That's a war crime right there.
+1@F4f879 If you'd like, you can use the version that doesn't have a scuffed flight model xD. That would definitely be very cool.
You didn't hear? Farming Simulator: Moscow Experience was renamed to "Don't starve together pt.2"
@F4f879 that's good to hear :)
Looks great, the cockpit is really well done. However it turns a bit too well I believe, and with the negative mass, the orbit camera is in a really odd and rather uncomfortable position. In the future I think you should try to build with lighter mass blocks from the start instead of decreasing weight later, or at least attach an orbit camera in the body to have a normal orbit view.
+1I am heavy weapons guy... and THIS... is my weapon
@F4f879 I'm looking forward to when you upload it lol
+1@F4f879 Glad you like mine hahaha, and that's good. If you get the flight characteristics just right as well, your attempt will be a lot better than mine :)
Wow looks great, I made an attempt at it a while ago but I messed up the fight characteristics, I had a fixed version here. Your cockpit is much better than my pretty basic interior but I think you could make the cables on the wings about half as thick. And IIRC I'm pretty sure the S.E.5.A's armament consisted of a Vickers mounted on the left side partially recessed into the body and a Lewis on top of the wing? Having two Lewis guns mounted like that seems a bit odd
@SimplyPlain well I genuinely do think you did a very nice job with the shape of the aircraft :). So I wasn't just trying to flatter you for an ulterior motive :)
Wow really good job with the body shape and the wings. Would you mind if I potentially use your P-47 in a few screenshots? I'm building a P-38J and I think it'd look really cool to have it, my P-51C and your P-47 all lined up :)
Adding on to what the other guy said, you can also have a gun that heals your parts lol
+1@metallicplanes Oh yeah, irl the Takao was an escort ship to the Kaga IIRC. I however, never built it.
@ElonMuskOfficial Moderator tracks your IP
+1@metallicplanes I don't really know what you're getting at?
@metallicplanes 3.8, congratulations! You've won nothing :)
@DatOneBoi I'm only going off of how you converse, so it's a little surprising a kid one year younger than me can act so immature.
People should just understand that this is a child that can't take a hint, and should stop caring and fighting him in the comments. One day people will stop caring about this and that's the day this kid will fade back into obscurity.
Looks fit for release to me, I don't know what you're on about.
+12@LuftwaffeAce262 I.... know that I'm in highschool math... I'm talking about the P-51 designation, I accidentally named it that instead of F-82... P-51 is the single fuselage Mustang.