@Hellohi
Grading:45/50- Great👍👍👍👍👍
Flight Performance: Good!
Historical Accuracy: The vertical tail may be a little tall.
STRONKNESS: A hero of the red star.
Flight Performance: Good!
Historical accuracy: Good, however I have to say that the vertical tail is extremely large for any MiG-19
STRONKNESS: Stalin approves!
Flight performance: Quite nimble
Historical Accuracy: mostly good , however the real MiG-8 was much wider.
STRONKNESS: N/A this is an experimental aircraft.
Flight Performance: Good!
Historical Accuracy: Good but 2 things: The MiG-25 didn't have guns, and the stronk red stars seem rotated in the wrong place a little bit.
STRONKNESS: STRONKNESS LEVEL IS OVER 9000!!!!
@FlyingNarwhal
The landing gear is way too short for the fuselage, what you could have done is put shorter landing gear in the front, balancing things out.
Flight Performance: Mobility could have been better.
Historical Accuracy: Pretty good! Well, except for the landing gear
STRONKNESS: The gun in the front does an excellent amount of damage, good job!!!
Final profit 3 upvotes
Got to gold b4 me...
@Supermini555
Thanks!
@SkullsAndCrossbones
It'll be up by tomorrow
@SkullsAndCrossbones
You mean the Trainer Hawk? Ok!
Why doesn't DRP ever post a plane @DRP
facepalm
@Viper28
When will the video be up?
@Viper28
YEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSS
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀
@Viper28
Why does that happen D:
@Viper28
wut
@Viper28
Thanks!
@CrazyCodeC
In this challenge realism is based on how accurate it's looks are to the real thing
@Bdog04
Ok , I wish you luck Komrade
@Hellohi
Grading:45/50- Great👍👍👍👍👍
Flight Performance: Good!
Historical Accuracy: The vertical tail may be a little tall.
STRONKNESS: A hero of the red star.
Overall good!
Final Profit: 6 upvotes
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
I think @AviownCorp would like this
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
Thanks m8. I wouldn't have got to 3K without you :D
@PaderiegeZ
Thanks!
@XxcreedexX
Thanks!!! :D
@Tully2001
Thanks! :D
@VladCelTroll
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
@MasterManufacturing
The prize is 10+ upvotes
@Mudkip @PINK @Pilotmario
Grading: 45/50
Flight Performance: Good!
Historical accuracy: Good, however I have to say that the vertical tail is extremely large for any MiG-19
STRONKNESS: Stalin approves!
Overall good job!
Final Profit: 5 upvotes
@PINK
Grading: 35/40
Flight performance: Quite nimble
Historical Accuracy: mostly good , however the real MiG-8 was much wider.
STRONKNESS: N/A this is an experimental aircraft.
Overall more detail would have been appreciated
Final profit: 3 upvotes
@Gestour
Congrats!
@KnightOfAraluen
SHOTS FIRED!!!!!!!!!!!!
@BaconRoll
No problem!
@Mudkip @MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation @Supermini555
@VladcelTroll @PINK @Pilotmario
Grading: 45/50- Great!!! 👍👍👍
Flight Performance: Good!
Historical Accuracy: Good but 2 things: The MiG-25 didn't have guns, and the stronk red stars seem rotated in the wrong place a little bit.
STRONKNESS: STRONKNESS LEVEL IS OVER 9000!!!!
Final profit: 6 upvotes!
@FlyingNarwhal
The landing gear is way too short for the fuselage, what you could have done is put shorter landing gear in the front, balancing things out.
@mikoyanster
Ok! 👍👍
@Deloreandude
You can but you have to reupload it as a successor
@VladcelTroll @Mudkip @MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
Grading: 35/50
Flight Performance: Mobility could have been better.
Historical Accuracy: Pretty good! Well, except for the landing gear
STRONKNESS: The gun in the front does an excellent amount of damage, good job!!!
Final profit 3 upvotes
@frostbite
Ok!
@BaconRoll
Just put it in as a successor
@BaconRoll
Sure!
@TehNewDucky
No prob
@TehNewDucky
No prob man, I often confuse Iran with Iraq
@CrazyCodeC @MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
@TehNewDucky
There is a difference between Swedish and Swiss...
@SkullsAndCrossbones
Can you please upvote so this gets more recognition? thanks :)
@SkullsAndCrossbones
Ok!
@TrainDude
Lol m8 I agree
@oDDDynamics
Good. I'm thinking of getting an android for SP so I can get mods and better gameplay.
@GoldenEagle
Thanks!
@GoldenEagle
I need an MBT
Can its name be Rathwara IX?
Specifications: Must be under 250 parts