Not possible, cannot do landing gear or cockpits without XML, it requires me to edit the "no collisions" parameter remember. Simply put, this challange requirements conflict with each other, you aren't gonna have a cockpit without making parts smaller.
@EpicPigster1
Generally, people like the eye candy, I mean, you probably know that builds with ultra detail generally do quite well. Then you can just make a mobile friendly version with the ultra detailed one.
@EpicPigster1
While it is a lovely car, you shouldn't be playing for "popularity", instead have fun in what you make, and if you like it a lot, share it with the community. If something doesn't get much recognition, so what?
I know REW is here, I've seen him comment and do stuff. Also, like anyone else, you'll have to wait until I finish the plane. Then I might make a mobile friendly version for mobile users. @GermanWarMachine
I see that you want to dabble your toes art of cockpit making. Well, make sure you have a firm grasp on the basics of the game, don't bite off more than you can chew, otherwise you'll have a very tacky result.
Ugh, your absolutely too obsessed over upvotes. Play the game for fun, not for some counter on your build. Whether it's fair, well no, but life is never fair. @pavthepilot
They're not better nor worse because they're not the same.
What your asking me to do is to tell me which ones a better, TV or pasta, two completely unrelated topics
@pavthepilot
Well, you asked for it.
I will now dissect your plane:
1.) Defult cockpit is a no no. They just look bad, really easy to make a fusalage cockpit too, better shape ect.
2.) Fusalage shape is clucky and wrong. The real fusalage follows back behind the cockpit (unless it's the Yak 1b), it's smooth too, unlike this. This shouldn't be hard to do, especially with being able to type sizes in.
3.) Tail, it's just not good. Try to use fusalage to make a smoother vertical stab and horizontal stab, they really not very nice right now
4.) Landing gear, it's not correct. WW2 planes have singular wheeled landing gear, with resizable wheels this shouldn't be hard. Plus with the parts transform tool, why didn't you nudge it into the wing so it looked connected. Also wheels are generally black not white.
5.) The wings. While the shaping might be alright, I highly encourage you to expose the ailerons, I personally know of people who despise hidden ailerons.
6.) Extras: Fusalage is generally too thin. Wings lack the correct dihedral. Proportions are a bit off.
If you think that was harsh, I'm sorry, but whining wasn't gonna do anything so I gave to you straight up, no sugar coating.
We all start bad, it's just how we go about getting better. Time is of the essence!
Ahh, forgot about the ejection seat, whoops. Thank you for the feedback though
@A3
Thank you
@QingyuZhou
Yeah, that probably could've worked
@Hawkeye156
Yeah, I regret putting them there, but there wasn't much space
@tsampoy
Cheers man, glad that you enjoyed it
@SimpleFlow
There's the amazon gift card though, but competition is a bit harder there. It'd be nice to move to PC, but well wait and see...
@EpicPigster1
I hope, but I'm more worried that he'll call it off due to the lack of entries.
@EpicPigster1
Thank you once again, this build has taken a month as a matter of fact, I've just been chipping away at it slowly.
@EpicPigster1
She's nice, without the spy stuff.
@temporaryaccount
Like the guns?
Wasn't enough room for them unfortunately.
@Hawkeye156
Thanks
@SSSvaSSa
@Hawkeye156
Thanks @BogdanX
Not possible, cannot do landing gear or cockpits without XML, it requires me to edit the "no collisions" parameter remember. Simply put, this challange requirements conflict with each other, you aren't gonna have a cockpit without making parts smaller.
@EpicPigster1
Generally, people like the eye candy, I mean, you probably know that builds with ultra detail generally do quite well. Then you can just make a mobile friendly version with the ultra detailed one.
@EpicPigster1
No, it's cause your probably on low physics
@gareth1234
While it is a lovely car, you shouldn't be playing for "popularity", instead have fun in what you make, and if you like it a lot, share it with the community. If something doesn't get much recognition, so what?
Thank you, I'm glad that you enjoy them
@Danielnieto
Yes I have
@Danielnieto
True, it'd also explain why the devs don't upvote featured creations most of the time.
@BlazeInfinity
Thank you, but really anyone can do this. The only thing I do is learn to divide by 2, and use the part transform tool.
@KidKromosone
I know REW is here, I've seen him comment and do stuff. Also, like anyone else, you'll have to wait until I finish the plane. Then I might make a mobile friendly version for mobile users. @GermanWarMachine
I see that you want to dabble your toes art of cockpit making. Well, make sure you have a firm grasp on the basics of the game, don't bite off more than you can chew, otherwise you'll have a very tacky result.
It's flak, a direct or nearby hit is devastating, especially for lighter crafts. It's not a bug, it's a mechanic.
I think it's a bit late to change it now, but I definitely will work on it. @QingyuZhou
Well, at least yours had an interior, mines just gonna be empty
@QingyuZhou
Yeah, Rew is a lot better with fusalage panelling,
@koryg
Thank you
@F4f879
Rew is back, you can check out his works via the users tab or the highest rated creations
@temporaryaccount
Thank you
@kgv23
Thanks, though I personally think REW is better
@jamesPLANESii
Thanks
@Aarons123
@BaconEggs
@Feanor
Here's the link, they're really small though...
Here
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/SiEuIe/Spy-Car
It is, I have some that are set to AG 1 and 2
@jamesPLANESii
Never expected a jet from you, looks good by the way.
Well I built this on iOS, so you know, mines turned to ashes
@CursedFlames
I guess you can do that
@TommySchram13
This is very big, I mean it looks nice but it's size is just far too big, even if it is to scale
+1Yeah, what about undoing?
@koryg
Don't worry, we all make mistakes. Looks wonderful by the way, great work once again
@WalrusAircraft
Um, those ships were introduced in the 1.7 update, virtually everyone knows of them...
Well medium flak can cause some mild damage, specially if it's a direct hit
@TheOwlAce
Thank you,
@AmiYouri2007
Damage like that depends on whether it was heavy flak, medium flak or light flak @temporaryaccount
How come my landing gear for the F8F worked fine?
Strange, never happens to me
Pretty sure it's based on metres, but I'm not too sure. Just check how big a block (1x1x1) is and then scale via that.
Well, you can always upload less oftenly, you know, quality over quantity?
@ACMECo1940
Ugh, your absolutely too obsessed over upvotes. Play the game for fun, not for some counter on your build. Whether it's fair, well no, but life is never fair. @pavthepilot
He has 84 followers, you have 35, he has a bigger audience that's all. @pavthepilot
They're not better nor worse because they're not the same.
What your asking me to do is to tell me which ones a better, TV or pasta, two completely unrelated topics
@pavthepilot
Well, you asked for it.
I will now dissect your plane:
1.) Defult cockpit is a no no. They just look bad, really easy to make a fusalage cockpit too, better shape ect.
2.) Fusalage shape is clucky and wrong. The real fusalage follows back behind the cockpit (unless it's the Yak 1b), it's smooth too, unlike this. This shouldn't be hard to do, especially with being able to type sizes in.
3.) Tail, it's just not good. Try to use fusalage to make a smoother vertical stab and horizontal stab, they really not very nice right now
4.) Landing gear, it's not correct. WW2 planes have singular wheeled landing gear, with resizable wheels this shouldn't be hard. Plus with the parts transform tool, why didn't you nudge it into the wing so it looked connected. Also wheels are generally black not white.
5.) The wings. While the shaping might be alright, I highly encourage you to expose the ailerons, I personally know of people who despise hidden ailerons.
6.) Extras: Fusalage is generally too thin. Wings lack the correct dihedral. Proportions are a bit off.
If you think that was harsh, I'm sorry, but whining wasn't gonna do anything so I gave to you straight up, no sugar coating.
We all start bad, it's just how we go about getting better. Time is of the essence!
@pavthepilot