@Boeing727200F Life alert? Never heard that term before.
And no, Graingy does not have any unions. We do, however, have robust protections.
Daren Sesame was investigated during the Red Scare in the 1950s.
@overlord5453 So let me see if I'm getting this right:
Every cockpit part on an aircraft measures its own position/velocity/etc.
Each of these, for each part, can be assigned a corresponding control output.
FT can be used to make the cockpit try point at(?) the selected target, or point where the velocity of both dictates they'd meet.
The outputs can be used to control specially assigned control surfaces to fly the missile.
Did I get that right? Keep in mind my FT experience is literally zero beyond stealing ammo count screens out of the new stock craft.
To be clear, I am Grain. Same person as behind Graingy. I just checked my personal account.
I have a tendency to converse across the two.
Anyways, how do secondary cockpits fit in? And how do you plan to keep the bomb working once disconnected?
Flag designs that I would accordingly consider objectively good (disregarding their connotations) include:
The Union Jack, the flag of Canada, the flag of the USA (though it has an excessive number of elements), the flag of Japan, the flag of both Koreas, the flag of Brazil (main elements, text and stars excluded), the flag of Quebec (though the "fleurs-de-lis" are themselves tricky), the flag of Georgia (country), the flag of Newfoundland and Labrador, the flag of Nazi Germany (again, from an objective design standpoint), the flag of South Africa, the flag of Israel (ignoring religious nature of the Star of David), the Confederate Battle Flag (Really not a good lineup I have forming here, heh), the Flag of the USSR (1936-1955 and 1955-1991 designs, though for slightly different reasons, and both are rather challenging to define), flag of Yugoslavia, flag of Greenland.
All of these make heavy use of either straight lines or circles. Bringing in freehand elements, in my view, makes for a difficult to reproduce design and lessens the value of the design as an emblem.
The colour combo works, I think, but the mouse image is... Personally I am not a fan of flag or insignia which cannot be practically mathematically defined.
@TheMouse Pfft
The cost of fame
@Talon7192 money to buy a crowbar?
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 YOU’RE BLACK
make that 2000 tonnes, I think.
@EnglishGarden From then.
Gutterman
@overlord5453 I'm sure it'll be fiiiine.
+1Now if you don't mind me I'm going to go in the other direction-
@Boeing727200F I don't have a charge nor gun :/
@overlord5453 Graingy studies suggest economic centralization with improved working conditions is vastly more efficient in the long run. So, no.
+2@Mosquitowithagun
OUT.
+1It's been five years, though. Maybe someone's already claimed them...?
Nah, that'd mean going to France. Nobody wants to do that.
@Boeing727200F Life alert? Never heard that term before.
And no, Graingy does not have any unions. We do, however, have robust protections.
Daren Sesame was investigated during the Red Scare in the 1950s.
They have to speak beepity bapitty boopitty
@Boeing727200F And do you know how to replace those engineers?
@Mosquitowithagun That looks fucking delicious.
+1@overlord5453 That would violate our labour policy so bad.
@Boeing727200F With what you said about those I don't think the CEO would want those in our properties.
+2Also, *Effective
@Mosquitowithagun How bad is that pizza?
+1@overlord5453 I was more hoping for ideas relating to the smoothness. Like, idk, sledding or something. I only have one, unfortunately.
@Boeing727200F I need ideas.
And the range is notoriously long for these things. As I said, air resistance is comparatively minimal.
@overlord5453 So let me see if I'm getting this right:
+1Every cockpit part on an aircraft measures its own position/velocity/etc.
Each of these, for each part, can be assigned a corresponding control output.
FT can be used to make the cockpit try point at(?) the selected target, or point where the velocity of both dictates they'd meet.
The outputs can be used to control specially assigned control surfaces to fly the missile.
Did I get that right? Keep in mind my FT experience is literally zero beyond stealing ammo count screens out of the new stock craft.
Caanabana
@TheMouse Italian rodent?
+1I'd start looking for a lawyer right about now...
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 That wasn't me...
Who the hell did you just shoot down.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 You must have the same supplier as @Guywhobuildsstuff
Page 900 of best of the year
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 By your initial count they should've arrived by now.
Magahorus
+1@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Must be very slow.
@TheMouse Did I win?
To be clear, I am Grain. Same person as behind Graingy. I just checked my personal account.
+1I have a tendency to converse across the two.
Anyways, how do secondary cockpits fit in? And how do you plan to keep the bomb working once disconnected?
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 No. I don't think flares even used or evasive maneuvers taken.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Potatoes, huh?
@EnglishGarden Reminds me, you still owe me a plane.
S duck
With money or with crowbar??
I mean, it looks like some Tangent stuff.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Thank goodness for countermeasures...
@Boeing727200F No.
I am blinded
@Mosquitowithagun Buckle up
+1@Boeing727200F No, but it's slowing down.
Flag designs that I would accordingly consider objectively good (disregarding their connotations) include:
The Union Jack, the flag of Canada, the flag of the USA (though it has an excessive number of elements), the flag of Japan, the flag of both Koreas, the flag of Brazil (main elements, text and stars excluded), the flag of Quebec (though the "fleurs-de-lis" are themselves tricky), the flag of Georgia (country), the flag of Newfoundland and Labrador, the flag of Nazi Germany (again, from an objective design standpoint), the flag of South Africa, the flag of Israel (ignoring religious nature of the Star of David), the Confederate Battle Flag (Really not a good lineup I have forming here, heh), the Flag of the USSR (1936-1955 and 1955-1991 designs, though for slightly different reasons, and both are rather challenging to define), flag of Yugoslavia, flag of Greenland.
All of these make heavy use of either straight lines or circles. Bringing in freehand elements, in my view, makes for a difficult to reproduce design and lessens the value of the design as an emblem.
The colour combo works, I think, but the mouse image is... Personally I am not a fan of flag or insignia which cannot be practically mathematically defined.
@LowQualityRepublic We cool again?
@hpgbproductions A Red Rock is in the base!
@Convex behind
@Mosquitowithagun nuh uh
hammer
Jar Jet Arc ft. Milk
Jar jEt aRc ft. milK
@Boeing727200F No.
It's a conceptual flank, really.