@sexylips35
I tried to make a gun-engine helicopter but that one end up in its own flames(like that one failed)
But I built another tilt-wing with normal engine(because I want to) and that became the 35,000 pound lifting beast
@sexylips35
Well if things explode (because of engine, then sorry, check your physics setting-a low physics setting makes bullets calculated incorrectly and of course...)
If it is the grand slam, take it out.
@CCXRCC
Oh I was thinking because if you go too quickly the front wheel will go nuts and sometimes the piston explodes and say parts damaged: piston
I was thinking why are you using pistons...
Yep the rear brakes first I was not knowing what I am typing...
@CCXRCC
Very nice!
I personally do not really like road bikes just because the skinny tires. I have MADE a mountain bike from a scavenged bike frame (GT bikes) and bought decent mountain wheel sets (Mavic) and very, very old Shimano 3x8 derailleur. I plan on replacing my current tire (small-block-eight by KENDA) with something more fitting with long-distance urban travel (like, 12 miles! a day). No rack, it still will be a RUGGED commuter.(Suspension was good enough, a ancient DOWN-HILL suspension fork, so going up the pavement is just simple-you ride directly up at it.)
Upvote for effort and derailleur.
OOO Shimano 105! XDDDD
Very nice...
Garmin make bike computers? Mine use a ancient SIGMA one.
Front brake first?
Still works just as well.
But why do you need pistons?
Awww you could have mechanized the derailleur by putting rotators(at least some visuals) but this is more than good.
@jamesPLANESii
~~It probably won't based on how it flys~~ It would be a nice thing, though. Moving the wings up forward by 1 block (0.5 unit) will solve he problem.
Probably too many landing gear though...
@SpiritusRaptor Ver nice!
I was saying that you are not using a infini-rotating rotator.
I am right...you are using VTOL engines.
But, try and not have the rotor tip provide the main lift (or they will bend upwards, looking awkward and ugly)
The real helicopters have a extremenly fast rotor that is not possible here, but their blade do not bend upward.
Yes it is nimble. TOO nimble being the word. (how can a helicopter reach over 100 mph?)
And this helicopter's lift (collective) curve was weird that if you throttle 0 there will still be lots of lift making faster decent impossible (I tried this on the short landing, keeping drifting skyward because I wasn't too good at the curve. Turned main rotor off and finally lost some altitude.) Try have the VTOL engine to be associated to throttle
HINT: you can have one of the engines associated with ACTIVATE GROUP 1 for (idling) and the other associated with throttle. Real helicopters do.
@MethaManAircraft
Don't feel like you being inactive was a bad thing
I started PROGRAMMING and was now writing couple historically successful games-PONG and BRICKBREAKER on my ARDUBOY
So I kind of dropping this. Don't worry, I will be more "here" after I write ASTROIDS
@Liyicheng
Sorry for the coming three years.
I cannot do much in my iPhone but good luck out there (sounds like that school sucks)
I was......stuck in China. Currently at Barstow International, I have good days. I was 16.5 year old now.
If you do not even have weekends, too bad.
But I also had my time.
Good luck, later.
Can you make a manual version? I am kind of not used to and HAVE HEADACHE using a automatic one as that involves a super-stupid spring that takes forever to reset itself and the lack of control over everything.
@IMFLYINHERE
With some modding it probably still will work -- reverse the velocity and make the bullet do no damage. My "flamethrower" and "water sprinkler" are somewhat recent creations that still mostly work -- one deal very small damage and the other deal negative damage (repairs parts)
why would I care
It's a stupid game that the only reason I downloaded again is to make sure the accurized models will actually perform decent so I can put this design somewhere else and stop wasting time here for any longer
of which it did. end of story.
I was going to drop a like
But consider the toxicity from everywhere and the lackluster response from game devs about updating the game's core, I didn't.
Only the ones that suffered miserably, and some more, are deemed "worthy" by the community and produce truly excellent builds. But by that time, you'd be much better off going either to professional CAD your design (like I am doing) or just play another game.
Yes, the turret is a bit too big. Not very noticeable, but it instantly thrown all of the german aspect ratio out of the window
How did you mess it up like that
@Gestour
Yes, but again. My thinking is that the slowness of the core should be reflected in the game running slow rather than laggy and having parts glitching all over the place
although I guess part of the argument against that theory would be how the programmer would assume that the device is able to do this many frames (or whatsover) per second
However, this does not make sense when some symptoms are "weak joints" or "wobbly hinges" which appear to be more of floating point precision loss rather than the inability to perform calculations. although there may be attempts to speed things up by intentionally dropping precision.
I'm asking the question rather to confirm/find out the reason and potential workarounds.
@Formula350
I do not know what you are talking about.
I also think you should try fiddle with terrain quality and physics quality. And, of course, it's not mobile.
Also. SimplePlanes do not run on Unity.
Very good (a.k.a. incredible) amount of ground clearance, although they won't work with the type of load given to them. Four-link is the go-to for monster trucks.
See this one
@Ethological @Rapidfire747w
I think it's designed this way so as to confuse enemies. Reversed layout nevertheless give great advantages over pitch agity.
@kaaraabiner
Eh. Maybe.
@Ergi
The american (or the way I learned) is "cannon".
The german way that I come to know is "kanone"
It's more like a howitzer, or "Haubitze", but I had yet to find a proper designation. Also some guns in german arsenal is called "mörsar". Probably meant "mortar".
The 15cm slg is called "schweres Infanterie Geschütz 33", with "geschütz" meaning "gun", and "schweres" meaning "heavy".
So piecing everything together, this might be called "schweres waffentrager auf E 100".
But the way german call SPGs -- they call them Geschützwagon instead.
So maybe I will call it "Schwerer Geshützwagon E 100". This end up being simply adding"schwerer" to the vehicle in world of tanks.
But if you look at it, the infamous "schwerer gustav" have a caliber of 80cm, and that is a supersonic gun firing armor-piercing shells. This instead simply lobs high-explosive shells.
@sexylips35
+1DON'T RUN THIS ON YOUR 3-YEAR-OLD PHONE....You will BREAK it!
Looks quite good.
+1Don't use the stupid gyro when climbing hills!
@sexylips35
+1I tried to make a gun-engine helicopter but that one end up in its own flames(like that one failed)
But I built another tilt-wing with normal engine(because I want to) and that became the 35,000 pound lifting beast
@sexylips35
+1Ah...
You kind of stole my idea...but I created a VTOL BEAST that lifts 35,000 pound using normal engines
@sexylips35
+1Well if things explode (because of engine, then sorry, check your physics setting-a low physics setting makes bullets calculated incorrectly and of course...)
If it is the grand slam, take it out.
@SpiritusRaptor
+1But when I was looking for lift and maneuverability, I went here.
@RailfanEthan
+1"pwn"ed being the word..
@CCXRCC
+1Oh I was thinking because if you go too quickly the front wheel will go nuts and sometimes the piston explodes and say parts damaged: piston
I was thinking why are you using pistons...
Yep the rear brakes first I was not knowing what I am typing...
@CCXRCC
+1Very nice!
I personally do not really like road bikes just because the skinny tires. I have MADE a mountain bike from a scavenged bike frame (GT bikes) and bought decent mountain wheel sets (Mavic) and very, very old Shimano 3x8 derailleur. I plan on replacing my current tire (small-block-eight by KENDA) with something more fitting with long-distance urban travel (like, 12 miles! a day). No rack, it still will be a RUGGED commuter.(Suspension was good enough, a ancient DOWN-HILL suspension fork, so going up the pavement is just simple-you ride directly up at it.)
Upvote for effort and derailleur.
OOO Shimano 105! XDDDD
Very nice...
Garmin make bike computers? Mine use a ancient SIGMA one.
Front brake first?
Still works just as well.
But why do you need pistons?
Awww you could have mechanized the derailleur by putting rotators(at least some visuals) but this is more than good.
@jamesPLANESii
+1~~It probably won't based on how it flys~~ It would be a nice thing, though. Moving the wings up forward by 1 block (0.5 unit) will solve he problem.
Probably too many landing gear though...
@CenturiVonKikie
+1Actually I wasn't too good at helicopters. Most of us aren't.
I just know usually they are slower than their fixed-wing counterpart.
@SpiritusRaptor Ver nice!
+1I was saying that you are not using a infini-rotating rotator.
I am right...you are using VTOL engines.
But, try and not have the rotor tip provide the main lift (or they will bend upwards, looking awkward and ugly)
The real helicopters have a extremenly fast rotor that is not possible here, but their blade do not bend upward.
Yes it is nimble. TOO nimble being the word. (how can a helicopter reach over 100 mph?)
And this helicopter's lift (collective) curve was weird that if you throttle 0 there will still be lots of lift making faster decent impossible (I tried this on the short landing, keeping drifting skyward because I wasn't too good at the curve. Turned main rotor off and finally lost some altitude.) Try have the VTOL engine to be associated to throttle
HINT: you can have one of the engines associated with ACTIVATE GROUP 1 for (idling) and the other associated with throttle. Real helicopters do.
@Tengam
+1They upvote because they like it
I like your stats but... what is vertical loop?
@MethaManAircraft
+1Don't feel like you being inactive was a bad thing
I started PROGRAMMING and was now writing couple historically successful games-PONG and BRICKBREAKER on my ARDUBOY
So I kind of dropping this. Don't worry, I will be more "here" after I write ASTROIDS
@PorkyClown3
+1The Hinge rotator of wonder.....
There are no other islands?
+1I thought someone were talking over some TRAIN TRACK...
Guess you just need to download another map.
Yes the wheels in Simpleplanes do opened up a lot more possibility.
+1@Liyicheng
+1Sorry for the coming three years.
I cannot do much in my iPhone but good luck out there (sounds like that school sucks)
I was......stuck in China. Currently at Barstow International, I have good days. I was 16.5 year old now.
If you do not even have weekends, too bad.
But I also had my time.
Good luck, later.
Ah, the mushroom antenna.
+1What is the receiver's brand? (lol)
Must be fried with Peanut oil.
+1I am OK if a machine made the cut.
Man I miss the FIVE GUYS days...
@Pinata14 I am a 16 year-old student interested at any type of mechanical objects and “stock up” on general knowledge.
+1@Pinata14 Well you can release a new and better edition anyway
+1redirected from the rules when I am spending my time......wow. Get featured?
+1Cool. I love Churchill I though.......
+1Can you make a manual version? I am kind of not used to and HAVE HEADACHE using a automatic one as that involves a super-stupid spring that takes forever to reset itself and the lack of control over everything.
+1100 parts? sick
@IMFLYINHERE
With some modding it probably still will work -- reverse the velocity and make the bullet do no damage. My "flamethrower" and "water sprinkler" are somewhat recent creations that still mostly work -- one deal very small damage and the other deal negative damage (repairs parts)
To scale, but massively fast. and heavy.
Althought the weight issue cannot really be solved without massive research on actual weight of parts..
Massive static model. 3D printing much?
I wish DRS would be a thing. Cars with aero can go absolutely insane with those.
It's starting to take shape!
the old gun have a burst. the cannons dont
valiant effort.
My version
Not too different.
why would I care
It's a stupid game that the only reason I downloaded again is to make sure the accurized models will actually perform decent so I can put this design somewhere else and stop wasting time here for any longer
of which it did. end of story.
I was going to drop a like
But consider the toxicity from everywhere and the lackluster response from game devs about updating the game's core, I didn't.
Only the ones that suffered miserably, and some more, are deemed "worthy" by the community and produce truly excellent builds. But by that time, you'd be much better off going either to professional CAD your design (like I am doing) or just play another game.
Yes, the turret is a bit too big. Not very noticeable, but it instantly thrown all of the german aspect ratio out of the window
How did you mess it up like that
@Gestour
Yes, but again. My thinking is that the slowness of the core should be reflected in the game running slow rather than laggy and having parts glitching all over the place
although I guess part of the argument against that theory would be how the programmer would assume that the device is able to do this many frames (or whatsover) per second
However, this does not make sense when some symptoms are "weak joints" or "wobbly hinges" which appear to be more of floating point precision loss rather than the inability to perform calculations. although there may be attempts to speed things up by intentionally dropping precision.
I'm asking the question rather to confirm/find out the reason and potential workarounds.
... Oh. We have multiplayer. This help explain.
For a moment I thought the lower ones are some kind of weird emoji characters
🤩
@Formula350
I do not know what you are talking about.
I also think you should try fiddle with terrain quality and physics quality. And, of course, it's not mobile.
Also. SimplePlanes do not run on Unity.
Hey, it is actually quite impressive ...
Very good (a.k.a. incredible) amount of ground clearance, although they won't work with the type of load given to them. Four-link is the go-to for monster trucks.
See this one
The handling on pavement (a.k.a. runway) is quite incredible. But it can't even move offroad.
Quite heavy, too.
@realSavageMan
lol
@Ethological @Rapidfire747w
I think it's designed this way so as to confuse enemies. Reversed layout nevertheless give great advantages over pitch agity.
@kaaraabiner
Eh. Maybe.
@Ergi
The american (or the way I learned) is "cannon".
The german way that I come to know is "kanone"
It's more like a howitzer, or "Haubitze", but I had yet to find a proper designation. Also some guns in german arsenal is called "mörsar". Probably meant "mortar".
The 15cm slg is called "schweres Infanterie Geschütz 33", with "geschütz" meaning "gun", and "schweres" meaning "heavy".
So piecing everything together, this might be called "schweres waffentrager auf E 100".
But the way german call SPGs -- they call them Geschützwagon instead.
So maybe I will call it "Schwerer Geshützwagon E 100". This end up being simply adding"schwerer" to the vehicle in world of tanks.
But if you look at it, the infamous "schwerer gustav" have a caliber of 80cm, and that is a supersonic gun firing armor-piercing shells. This instead simply lobs high-explosive shells.
why don't you just strap the rotators to the propeller directly?
@TheNightmareCompany
How did you make sure that the blades do not fight each other?
@TheNightmareCompany
I mean that you could make the user able to explode the "tnt" via press of button (or activation group)
sounds interesting.
Fixed plane.
link
I feel like it is missing something, but I can't name what that is missing.
"I hate to see a bird go down like that."
What's wrong with helicopters?