@Mitterbin You forgot to add tags, which is the thing at the top of the page next to the download counter. If your plane has tags, then it will show up in the search results whenever someone searches one of the tags, allowing your plane to be seen at any point
@blt it does, but PEA puts the Simple back into simpleplanes. I don't understand the hate behind PEA. Some people may misuse the title, but Part Efficiency is something this site needs more of
@blt the mobile friendly tag is a bit vague. To me, PEA means realistic, good looking planes that are below 100 parts. Part Efficient planes have more flexibility than high part models
@Pakdaaircraftindustries I know, but the name "AC-130" and images lead me to believe that this was the gunship variant, and that you have posted the wrong version
@Boeing727200F you should add tags so people can see this in the future
+1@Rob119 spotlight time
Could you please make a BMPT Terminator?
+1@asrun What did you change?
Welcome back!
+1@Nation1 you should add tags so people can see this in the future
@Mitterbin You forgot to add tags, which is the thing at the top of the page next to the download counter. If your plane has tags, then it will show up in the search results whenever someone searches one of the tags, allowing your plane to be seen at any point
+1@Mitterbin you should add tags so people can see this in the future
+1@MoriSamaSP you forgot the tags. You should probably through all of your planes and add tags, your planes are very good
@ThatrandomguywholikesSP you should add tags so people can see this in the future
@KPLBall you have posted significantly more than him, so you have more builds that your followers can upvote
@ShooterSteven you should add tags so people can see this in the future
@dackyjones you should add tags so people can see this in the future
+1@t10m What changed?
@LowQualityRepublic they claim t10m is their other account. Also, the title says "(fix some problems)", so they added something to it
@Rob119 @mod https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/4jlVlo/tank-is-6-simple
+2This post shows littlenika admitting that t10m is their other account
@IDK0 you should add tags so people can see this in the future
+1You're good 👍, just thought it was interesting
+1@LunarEclipseSP Correct, thank you
+1https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hudson_Wasp
@dabestsock https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/iLV4kk/VH-Toyota
@dabestsock I kinda did
The ZAZ-968 wasn't a front engined car, it was rear engined, as evidenced by the air scoops at the rear
+1@MoriSamaSP you should add tags so people can see this in the future, it's a very nice plane
She up on my load
@Boeing727200E you should add tags so people can see this in the future
@Avgeekaviationfan122 you should add tags so people can see this in the future
@Lemonsharkii you should add tags so people can see this in the future
+1@Rizik23 you should add tags so people can see this in the future
+1@THAI1143 you should add tags so people can see this in the future
@Convex please remember to add tags, you make great planes! I don't want them to end up only being accessible with the search bar
@Rizik23 can you please add tags, your planes don't deserve to be banished to the search bar
+2@Convex you should add tags so people can see this in the future
@MoriSamaSP you should add tags so people can see this in the future
@Convex this is a very nice replica, you should add more tags so people can see this in the future
Good lord
+1@Rizik23 you should add tags so people can see this in the future
+1@blt it does, but PEA puts the Simple back into simpleplanes. I don't understand the hate behind PEA. Some people may misuse the title, but Part Efficiency is something this site needs more of
@blt the mobile friendly tag is a bit vague. To me, PEA means realistic, good looking planes that are below 100 parts. Part Efficient planes have more flexibility than high part models
+1@Rizik23 you should add tags so people can see this in the future
Absolute banger, we finally have a low part Mule!
@KarakalMaschinenbauAnlage you should add tags so people can see this in the future
This may have not been an entry, but I'm glad it was in the successors, cause I would have never found this gem otherwise
@dabestsock I have no idea on how to make a towed plane. The glider just keeps going ahead and pulling the tow plane around
@dabestsock Can you clarify? Do you want me to add a C-47 tow plane?
@Pakdaaircraftindustries I know, but the name "AC-130" and images lead me to believe that this was the gunship variant, and that you have posted the wrong version
@Pakdaaircraftindustries where are the guns?
@WritersCrusadersAirCo2 If it's alright, can you please make a Boys anti-tank rifle?
@ARandomGuyj7j you should add tags so people can see this in the future
+1@Verglas you should add tags so people can see this in the future
+1