My bad, you should download the current version simpleplanes is using. I think it is Unity 2018.3.6, so you should buy Unity 2018.4.18f1. I cannot guarantee this is the current version. I’ll let you know after I have made more thorough research. Right now, there isn’t any room for research. Maybe you could call one of the developers.
@AndrewGarrison, is it possible that when someone XML uploads a new craft to replace an old one, will the thumbnails be the same or will there be a new one?
@Neruneten21, you can buy and learn some unity though. Jundroo uses unity for it’s software like simpleplanes. The best way to start is to try to make some mods. You can try to make map mods though.
Meet our leather boots with an exotic style. Our hard boots can stomp like a marching soldier while waterproof like a boat! These exquisite boots are reserved for our exclusive patrons! For more information, contact us.
@Neruneten21, well, you have to learn a lot of coding to join Jundroo, because games need a lot of codes. I’ll give an idea. You can make your own servers with procedurally generated islands in seeds, while the default one becomes just another preset. Such servers allow multiple crafts to be stored in one server, just like in SimpleRockets2. Plus, multiplayer becomes even more possible! Get it?
People will see you as trying to beg for upvotes with this.
.
Why don’t you just replace the “Upvote this post.” with “Give a reason why.”? It encourages users to give a reason why and that makes your idea more believable.
@JuanNotAnAlt, @Dathcha, @MrSilverWolf, actually it was a lame joke comment meant to contain a link to a joke parody of the 20th century title card the craft depicts. The big text is actually a link. No drama please...
.
Upon closer inspection, it becomes clear that the build appears to be build on hard work.
. Comment removed, seems like it did not have any jokey context at all, or is it???
@PioneerThe2nd, he is a curator that curates aircraft as explained in a pinned post by Andy Gary and curators have lime tags to distinguish themselves from other users. They aren’t part of the staff and consist of normal users who had just played SPVR alpha. This role may be temporary and may be removed in the future. JamesPLANESii was just making a joke.
@CrimsonOnigiri, oh yeah sorry, my bad. @Selcukk, my apologies for your inconvenience but please reread post I have edited due to an error CrimsonOnigiri has found. Thank you.
Creating a stable aircraft in simple planes is a very complex process. You need to make sure that the center of lift is at the back of the center of mass. You also need to make sure that you have the wings correctly used accurately. You may need a lot of trial and error to make a plane that flies decently. You are lucky you are a gamer that plays simpleplanes because if you are a designer at a big aircraft company, there is not much any room for trial and error as their prototypes are expensive.
Some parts jitter and get a bit off the usual place if the craft bumps the ground fast enough. This can be seen on parts connected to rotators where they are not connected to the main fuselage and as such are not so rigid.
I cannot understand why would you put an instructional video, sped it up, and put a gotye iwokeuplikethis song. I cannot even understand how instructional videos got intertwined with lore memes. I’m sorry, but no offense; it’s not even funny for me.
@ZeroWithSlashedO, while it is not recommended to rant, it’s not always a bad idea to rant, it’s just you made an unnecessary post in anger. I made a post protesting against “thx for upvotes” posts, since I see them as spam. Although you could protest at something really bad, please keep in mind that you have to be reasonable, make sure your post is not necessary, and that it does not break the rules. When you’re about to vent, I suggest meditating yourself. Watch some meditation videos to clear out your tenses, so you don’t shout like crazy. Thanks.
Rant = Feelings.
.
This post is quite unnecessary. Simple planes is made for players to use crafts and create derivatives (or successors) off them to encourage creativity. Without this, would there be any creativity? There are rules in place to prevent copies and those copies to be removed have little or no effort in place to modify said successors, such as bad and simplistic recolors, adding a bunch of weapons randomly without any effort, or just plain effortless. Would it be very damaging if the automatic successor tag is removed from a successor post and the user plagiarizes it?
There is NO way for funky trees to detect health. But you can see that a fuselage jitters when your craft hits a solid piece of terrain.
.
Nice cockpit by the way.
There aren’t any pedal controls for the car to work, so a lever is instead created as a substitute. I liked how you used a joystick to solve the throttle problem and to replace the wheel. I also liked how it can be used as an easy plane to explore things and discover locations. Maybe a good UFO substitute, LOL.
When I first see this post, I thought this is a serious health related post, but it’s actually just a non-health related teaser. I would have known if this was a teaser had there been a “[TEASER]” tag at the back of the name. Good riddance! :(
.
Nice gloster meteor by the way. Smooth, simple, low part count (I hope). Suggest cutting the wings in the inlet?
@Kangy, but I get none. And I have no pinned comments from Andy Gary, despite the upvote. But when I tried to edit it, it says it has been curated and cannot be edited.
I have an excavator, still unfinished. I abandoned it after an idea of an easy and multipurpose skid-steer loader got into my mind.
.
Nice build though.
A simple looking superstructure makes a durable one. If you’re into a Japanese superstructure, you feel the jittering. These super structures are called “queen Anne’s mansions” for their resemblance to such.
Energy weapons require a lot of research and are usually too expensive for mainstream combat. Ace combat developers had to make convenient exceptions for gameplay.
My bad, you should download the current version simpleplanes is using. I think it is Unity 2018.3.6, so you should buy Unity 2018.4.18f1. I cannot guarantee this is the current version. I’ll let you know after I have made more thorough research. Right now, there isn’t any room for research. Maybe you could call one of the developers.
Is it auto-aiming?
+3@AndrewGarrison, is it possible that when someone XML uploads a new craft to replace an old one, will the thumbnails be the same or will there be a new one?
@Neruneten21, the instructions to create your own map mods can be found here.
+1@Neruneten21, you can buy and learn some unity though. Jundroo uses unity for it’s software like simpleplanes. The best way to start is to try to make some mods. You can try to make map mods though.
Kaiser Boots Manufacturing
Meet our leather boots with an exotic style. Our hard boots can stomp like a marching soldier while waterproof like a boat! These exquisite boots are reserved for our exclusive patrons! For more information, contact us.
@Neruneten21, well, you have to learn a lot of coding to join Jundroo, because games need a lot of codes. I’ll give an idea. You can make your own servers with procedurally generated islands in seeds, while the default one becomes just another preset. Such servers allow multiple crafts to be stored in one server, just like in SimpleRockets2. Plus, multiplayer becomes even more possible! Get it?
@Neruneten21, nice idea by the way.
@Neruneten21, about the “upvote this post” thingy...
NO ONE CARES
People will see you as trying to beg for upvotes with this.
+1.
Why don’t you just replace the “Upvote this post.” with “Give a reason why.”? It encourages users to give a reason why and that makes your idea more believable.
This build has been APPROVED BY WNP78.
+4.
Pretty nice though. Looks just like the stock planes.
@JuanNotAnAlt, @Dathcha, @MrSilverWolf, actually it was a lame joke comment meant to contain a link to a joke parody of the 20th century title card the craft depicts. The big text is actually a link. No drama please...
+3.
Upon closer inspection, it becomes clear that the build appears to be build on hard work.
.
Comment removed, seems like it did not have any jokey context at all, or is it???
@PioneerThe2nd, he is a curator that curates aircraft as explained in a pinned post by Andy Gary and curators have lime tags to distinguish themselves from other users. They aren’t part of the staff and consist of normal users who had just played SPVR alpha. This role may be temporary and may be removed in the future. JamesPLANESii was just making a joke.
@CrimsonOnigiri, oh yeah sorry, my bad. @Selcukk, my apologies for your inconvenience but please reread post I have edited due to an error CrimsonOnigiri has found. Thank you.
+1Creating a stable aircraft in simple planes is a very complex process. You need to make sure that the center of lift is at the back of the center of mass. You also need to make sure that you have the wings correctly used accurately. You may need a lot of trial and error to make a plane that flies decently. You are lucky you are a gamer that plays simpleplanes because if you are a designer at a big aircraft company, there is not much any room for trial and error as their prototypes are expensive.
Some parts jitter and get a bit off the usual place if the craft bumps the ground fast enough. This can be seen on parts connected to rotators where they are not connected to the main fuselage and as such are not so rigid.
+1@WAR122, what are you referring to anyways, the tracks mod or the vanilla tank tracks?
Why the rickroll though? All the evidence I can get is just plain, old, boring text. Is this a joke?
This map made me feel like we’re in an usual fantasy setting.
+1Good luck.
.
Pro tip: use diagonal fuselages (but it will need diagonal slicing, in which we don’t have yet).
If there were diagonal slices, I could make an even more accurate crown! XD
I cannot understand why would you put an instructional video, sped it up, and put a gotye iwokeuplikethis song. I cannot even understand how instructional videos got intertwined with lore memes. I’m sorry, but no offense; it’s not even funny for me.
Looks like a raider from battestar galactica. Unique though.
+1@CRATE52PART2, I cannot guarantee my theory. I have not tested it out.
@ZeroWithSlashedO, while it is not recommended to rant, it’s not always a bad idea to rant, it’s just you made an unnecessary post in anger. I made a post protesting against “thx for upvotes” posts, since I see them as spam. Although you could protest at something really bad, please keep in mind that you have to be reasonable, make sure your post is not necessary, and that it does not break the rules. When you’re about to vent, I suggest meditating yourself. Watch some meditation videos to clear out your tenses, so you don’t shout like crazy. Thanks.
+2Rant = Feelings.
+1.
This post is quite unnecessary. Simple planes is made for players to use crafts and create derivatives (or successors) off them to encourage creativity. Without this, would there be any creativity? There are rules in place to prevent copies and those copies to be removed have little or no effort in place to modify said successors, such as bad and simplistic recolors, adding a bunch of weapons randomly without any effort, or just plain effortless. Would it be very damaging if the automatic successor tag is removed from a successor post and the user plagiarizes it?
There is NO way for funky trees to detect health. But you can see that a fuselage jitters when your craft hits a solid piece of terrain.
+1.
Nice cockpit by the way.
@asteroidbook345, but tags do not show up in the forums.
@jamesPLANESii, @GrentonAircraftCo, and you can only use the base game VR, once you bought SPVR.
+1There aren’t any pedal controls for the car to work, so a lever is instead created as a substitute. I liked how you used a joystick to solve the throttle problem and to replace the wheel. I also liked how it can be used as an easy plane to explore things and discover locations. Maybe a good UFO substitute, LOL.
+1When I first see this post, I thought this is a serious health related post, but it’s actually just a non-health related teaser. I would have known if this was a teaser had there been a “[TEASER]” tag at the back of the name. Good riddance! :(
.
Nice gloster meteor by the way. Smooth, simple, low part count (I hope). Suggest cutting the wings in the inlet?
@ToxyPilot, I was referring to the looks. It looks like a beefed up challenger.
@Gro, it’s already done.
Spectacular, feels like we’re in a Mad Max style apocalypse setting.
+1Beefed up Challenger?
@Kangy, but I get none. And I have no pinned comments from Andy Gary, despite the upvote. But when I tried to edit it, it says it has been curated and cannot be edited.
I have an excavator, still unfinished. I abandoned it after an idea of an easy and multipurpose skid-steer loader got into my mind.
.
Nice build though.
A simple looking superstructure makes a durable one. If you’re into a Japanese superstructure, you feel the jittering. These super structures are called “queen Anne’s mansions” for their resemblance to such.
+1@BeastHunter, no, you won’t get notified of when a build is curated.
+2@bilibiliuid432306208, and if you know what the part count limit is, it is 350.
Do you want to put it in the VR challenge?
So @AndrewGarrison, are you gonna minus the one added by the performance cost download?
Modern luxury. Ah, yes...
Congratulations, @Bryan5! Here’s your prize for completing your first refuel!
+1Nice guide, although some new users can detect that emission thingy. XD
Why not put this info from the description to the aircraft instructions?
BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRT!
.
+1I like the unqiue styling of the A 10. What I don’t like is the fact that it seems simple but is actually complex.
Pineapple apple plane... 😎
.
Like this. It makes a good defense advertisement.
To submit to the challenge, please use the following tags:
That’s a pretty good replica you made. Why don’t you use smoothing for the glass?
Energy weapons require a lot of research and are usually too expensive for mainstream combat. Ace combat developers had to make convenient exceptions for gameplay.