I think this is a model that only works in fiction. Pressurized hulls need less glass and more thickness. An exploration submarine usually has a complement of equipment. Otherwise nice work.
Haha, that’s a good start. The wings look ugly, the propellers are too far off from the fuselage (and also not equal), and there are 2 big vertical stabilizers instead of one, and the landing gear is too long and few, compared to other large seaplanes.
.
Learn some more so you can make better looking planes. You should use references when making planes. Fuselages and hollow fuselages have you the freedom to make good, looking stuff; you can also “slice” said fuselages. I hope you have fun with the site.
.
P.S. everything you do must follow the rules, if you do not follow these rules, you might get yourself into trouble.
Why do pilots smoke in their cockpits? Is it dangerous nowadays to smoke in your cockpits?
.
Their placement makes them liable to be thrown off and/or lost, once the plane starts getting fast and/or maneuvering.
.
Also, you misspelled the word “instructions”.
Pretty good for a plane. The propeller maybe too thick. The colors are a bit uninteresting to me but whatever. Your plane needs to be of tail wheel configuration, considering the engine may interfere with the front gear.
Challenge organizer: “Noooo! You cannot just cheat the challenge with a detacher! You’re disqualified from all challenges! Nooooo!”
The cheater: “Haha, detacher go tchish!”
@Brayden1981, please be clear and constructive with your reply. I do not understand what it stands for (being merely consisting of 11 green squares with white ticks emojis and nothing else), despite implying appreciation of this post.
Did you forget the link to the plane and instead used a rickroll instead? If you do, go here (it’s, as of now, 7.7 years ago). Note that the “Dev comment” is missing there and the most recent comments (at the time of this comment) are about more than 5 years ago.
.
The box brining up this weird scrabble is, of course, because of bad internet.
@Tsuchiisan, yes I am Indonesian (you can find me in the Indonesian server), the same as you. There are other Indonesian users too, and I think you know some of them. Now why are you asking me this?
.
P.S. please don’t swear again.
@Th3rmoplylae, weak spots vary, and you cannot just program a missile to target a weak spot simply. It needs to use radar or infrared devices, so it can target a ship and all have a small chance to hit a weak spot, so there isn’t a high chance a guided missile could hit a weak spot and ships nowadays have stealth features to reduce weak spots.
@Th3rmoplylae, and if the missiles were destructive enough, the ship became very expensive, despite it’s size, because the missiles are very expensive.
Obviously, I know it is hard, but how are people going to board this semi-trailer truck if the ground clearance is too high. I suggest lowering the ground clearance, unless this is a monster truck for use in stadiums only.
. UPDATE, JUST FOUND OUT AN EARLIER PREDECESSOR TO THIS WAS POSTED ON THE SITE, AND IT HAD A TRAILER IN ADDITION TO IT’S MONSTER TRUCK GROUND CLEARANCE.
Hello, @Yurakap5. Welcome to the site. Please read the rules and follow them, so you won’t get into trouble.
.
Yes, this is indeed your first plane, and a lot of flaws come by. The entire plane is unusually chrome, too many weapons, the wings looks odd, the fuselage and nose cone looks odd, the cockpit fuselage is missing (you could have used fuselage slicing), and there is indeed no throttle or trim control (and yaw pedals). Try to improve your skills. If you don’t know how to do it, try to figure it out by yourself, and if you still did not, get help from other people (and make sure you follow the aforementioned rules and try and be patient, don’t throw tantrums if you didn’t get help). Enjoy the privilege of using this site.
Nice concept. Could drive around in multiplayer. Only thing I want to note are the lack of gun elevation and the wheels to cover the entire length of the vehicle. Note that I consider this an armored car, unless you somehow make “fake tracks”.
Hi. Your pictures are like a luxury brand advertising business jets - the plane depicted is an actual business jet either.
.
White Grey is okay for me, because it helps users distinguish between the primary color and secondary color, while also being pretty basic.
You have taken a lot of time to refine the details and the looks and color scheme made me think that the mech is from an anime-styled freemium videogame. Good job.
That’s a good start...
.
Learn some more and you could build the crafts according to your wishes.
.
PS. I appreciate your willingness to make the plane VR-capable.
What if you replace the number 8 in a circle with the number 9, I wonder what would it look... ;)
.
Nice craft by the way. The window glass appears nonexistent, and the craft appears to have no smoothing.
Pretty good details and shape but still rough, looking like a high quality Minecraft model.
Found this in Wikipedia commons.
+2Good luck. Tell me, if this is the same one you are using.
I think this is a model that only works in fiction. Pressurized hulls need less glass and more thickness. An exploration submarine usually has a complement of equipment. Otherwise nice work.
+9@XIAOYU160091, you could replace it with a fighter cockpit, eh? I find it easier to make a fighter cockpit than an airliner cockpit.
I also noticed that the traditional Japanese-styled interior might move on the plane, likely causing damage. I hope that they are screwed in place...
So, this is...
It kind of still preserves the basic shape of a plane a bit. I assume you could not make a satisfying airliner front cockpit.
It does not look like a conventional helicopter. What if you remove the propellers at the tail and replace it with a vertical stabilizer instead?
+1Too much bombs but otherwise good wings. It got weird looks to me either.
+1Haha, that’s a good start. The wings look ugly, the propellers are too far off from the fuselage (and also not equal), and there are 2 big vertical stabilizers instead of one, and the landing gear is too long and few, compared to other large seaplanes.
+1.
Learn some more so you can make better looking planes. You should use references when making planes. Fuselages and hollow fuselages have you the freedom to make good, looking stuff; you can also “slice” said fuselages. I hope you have fun with the site.
.
P.S. everything you do must follow the rules, if you do not follow these rules, you might get yourself into trouble.
That’s a pretty decent replica you made, though it needs more improvements and refinication.
You made good details on the wings and cowling. It’s got details. The only thing I want is that the wings need to be refined a bit.
@DeveloperKorzalerke, ok if you wish to...
+4The front landing gear is too small. I assume there is no space left.
The side windows ruin the look of an old-school SimplePlanes build.
Why do pilots smoke in their cockpits? Is it dangerous nowadays to smoke in your cockpits?
.
Their placement makes them liable to be thrown off and/or lost, once the plane starts getting fast and/or maneuvering.
.
Also, you misspelled the word “instructions”.
The cruiser that rammed a cruise ship.
Out in theaters now!
+1Pretty good for a plane. The propeller maybe too thick. The colors are a bit uninteresting to me but whatever. Your plane needs to be of tail wheel configuration, considering the engine may interfere with the front gear.
That’s pretty good (although the roundel’s looks ruined the plane’s looks).
My most upvoted comment, as of this post, was a satirical dialogue based off the “Nooo, you can’t X” meme, regarding using detachers to easily finish the “going the distance” level (which gives you an achievement of the same name). The contents of this comment were:
Some of my most upvoted comments included:
+1- An highly exaggerated reaction to the first comment Jundroo’s official account made, treating said account as a malicious artificial intelligence.
- A summarized list of controversies that has ever happened in SimplePlanes.com.
I hope you do not lose interest in your new project. Good luck with that.
+1@Brayden1981, please be clear and constructive with your reply. I do not understand what it stands for (being merely consisting of 11 green squares with white ticks emojis and nothing else), despite implying appreciation of this post.
What do you mean by that?
+2@Tsuchiisan, I actually don’t know, but all I can remember is that you got into trouble multiple times.
@U-Boat
It’s small
It’s fast
It’s slick
The best part is it’s
Right in this website...
You know what’s missing, the front wheel (although it still WIP, so I’ll let you build it).
Ah finally, you’re back...
@qblMQ123, I mean the height is short, not the length. Troops could not fit into such a stubby vehicle.
+1Did you forget the link to the plane and instead used a rickroll instead? If you do, go here (it’s, as of now, 7.7 years ago). Note that the “Dev comment” is missing there and the most recent comments (at the time of this comment) are about more than 5 years ago.
.
The box brining up this weird scrabble is, of course, because of bad internet.
@Tsuchiisan, yes I am Indonesian (you can find me in the Indonesian server), the same as you. There are other Indonesian users too, and I think you know some of them. Now why are you asking me this?
.
P.S. please don’t swear again.
@Th3rmoplylae, weak spots vary, and you cannot just program a missile to target a weak spot simply. It needs to use radar or infrared devices, so it can target a ship and all have a small chance to hit a weak spot, so there isn’t a high chance a guided missile could hit a weak spot and ships nowadays have stealth features to reduce weak spots.
The world of luxury never ends, it keeps going on...
.
Nice yacht. The wood needs to be a series of long planks.
@Th3rmoplylae, and if the missiles were destructive enough, the ship became very expensive, despite it’s size, because the missiles are very expensive.
The first time I see this, it looks like an eggship. Could use in Multiplayer.
@DogeToTheMoon, yes, the new one looks similar to the Pacific P12.
Biggus greatus is here to stay.
Obviously, I know it is hard, but how are people going to board this semi-trailer truck if the ground clearance is too high. I suggest lowering the ground clearance, unless this is a monster truck for use in stadiums only.
.
UPDATE, JUST FOUND OUT AN EARLIER PREDECESSOR TO THIS WAS POSTED ON THE SITE, AND IT HAD A TRAILER IN ADDITION TO IT’S MONSTER TRUCK GROUND CLEARANCE.
Hello, @Yurakap5. Welcome to the site. Please read the rules and follow them, so you won’t get into trouble.
.
Yes, this is indeed your first plane, and a lot of flaws come by. The entire plane is unusually chrome, too many weapons, the wings looks odd, the fuselage and nose cone looks odd, the cockpit fuselage is missing (you could have used fuselage slicing), and there is indeed no throttle or trim control (and yaw pedals). Try to improve your skills. If you don’t know how to do it, try to figure it out by yourself, and if you still did not, get help from other people (and make sure you follow the aforementioned rules and try and be patient, don’t throw tantrums if you didn’t get help). Enjoy the privilege of using this site.
Nice concept. Could drive around in multiplayer. Only thing I want to note are the lack of gun elevation and the wheels to cover the entire length of the vehicle. Note that I consider this an armored car, unless you somehow make “fake tracks”.
Pretty nice replica attempt. Unfortunately, I cannot inspect the cockpit, so...
+1Hi. Your pictures are like a luxury brand advertising business jets - the plane depicted is an actual business jet either.
+1.
White Grey is okay for me, because it helps users distinguish between the primary color and secondary color, while also being pretty basic.
You have taken a lot of time to refine the details and the looks and color scheme made me think that the mech is from an anime-styled freemium videogame. Good job.
+1Nice, but from my sight, the cockpit looks bare.
+1Pretty nice IFV, though a little too short.
+1Nice plane overall. Just the cockpit fuselages need to be refined and the refuel probe interferes with an inlet, which is going to cause problems.
+2This is such a nice try at making a framed canopy. Unfortunately, the plane does not look as close as the IRL plane though.
What is the issue?
+1.
Is it bad flight (X-Wings are not fly able aerodynamically), the gyroscope being so rigid, the vibrations, or what?
Finally, you made a really decent craft! :D
That’s a good start...
+2.
Learn some more and you could build the crafts according to your wishes.
.
PS. I appreciate your willingness to make the plane VR-capable.
That’s pretty nice for this little tank. The spaced armor gives defense.
+1What if you replace the number 8 in a circle with the number 9, I wonder what would it look... ;)
.
Nice craft by the way. The window glass appears nonexistent, and the craft appears to have no smoothing.
There is an user named 7, he’s currently volunteering as a curator.
+2Tag it as solved if it is really solved (usually by adding “[SOLVED]” to the title and adding the “Solved” tag).