CoM and CoL are too close (basically coincident) and the plane is unflyable. Without the bombs it's a little better, Judge yourself if relase a new one (if successor of mine is better) or leave this one in.
I published a plane as public for mistake, I hope there are no "insipired" planes, because it has good chanche to be the winner. I removed it, but not first there is 3 download.
The pod work, and the plane flies, but the rear of the given parts is modified. This will count as "minus" in the judgment. BTW, thans for the time you spent for this entry in my little challenge.
The pod work, and the plane flies, so the entry is valid. Take off is really triky. Extensive tests at the end of the challenge. Thanks for your entry. :)
@randomusername nope, I chosed a selection of high-end parts compatible each other, ordered them and assembled all the parts by myself. Sadly the SSD HD is dead, and now I have "only" a TB for windows and a 2TB for the data, but convetional disks. Fast, but not fast as a SSD one.
@randomusername I buy all the parts on purpose, but not retail but wholesale. Even the motherboard is high-end, the cooling is liquid, the power supply is high-end ...
@stig27 I did just some quick tests, and extensive ones will be done only in august, but I think you have the rear gear too backward, and this make the rotation at take off impossible. You must wait the end of the strip, and just find yourself in air after the land end. The wings are a bit flappy, but it give no problems to the plane, so its not a problem.
Escape pod engines no longer work, so the pod can't really "escape". It can only bail out, but in many situation it fall back on the plane and explode. Invalid entry.
I suggest to check what is gone wrong, and fix it. :) BTW thanks for your time to built this.
@AviownCorp You are right my friend, but a lot of things have taken my mind in those months and maybe years. :( Last one my dad passed away, and I must follow my mom (89 years hold).
CoM and CoL are too close (basically coincident) and the plane is unflyable. Without the bombs it's a little better, Judge yourself if relase a new one (if successor of mine is better) or leave this one in.
@Zkillerwolfe After the first contender pass the first ring the time start for both. A nice vertical acceleration is the key
Very minor changes from my original.
It flies, and the pod works fine. Valid entry. The rudder is inverted.
Thanks for the time you spent for my little challenge.
@CrazyInventor What is your realistic target time?
I published a plane as public for mistake, I hope there are no "insipired" planes, because it has good chanche to be the winner. I removed it, but not first there is 3 download.
Pod is working, and the plane flies. Valid entry.
@pilotred233 nope, the challenge is based on using the given parts (in this post)
@Mong63 Save one as sub assembly, and freely ise it.
The pod work, and the plane flies, but the rear of the given parts is modified. This will count as "minus" in the judgment. BTW, thans for the time you spent for this entry in my little challenge.
The pod work, and the plane flies, so the entry is valid. Take off is really triky. Extensive tests at the end of the challenge. Thanks for your entry. :)
@BaconAircraft I hope we cant.
The SSD was a small disk (250 gb) where there was only windows, it was quick and a lot of operations was like a bullet.
Anyway, I use my PC also for edit my youtube videos, (I have a youtube channel), for 3D design, photoediting and - of course - to play videogames.
@randomusername nope, I chosed a selection of high-end parts compatible each other, ordered them and assembled all the parts by myself. Sadly the SSD HD is dead, and now I have "only" a TB for windows and a 2TB for the data, but convetional disks. Fast, but not fast as a SSD one.
Can someone tell me a good target time?
@randomusername I buy all the parts on purpose, but not retail but wholesale. Even the motherboard is high-end, the cooling is liquid, the power supply is high-end ...
It flies perfectly. GJ.
One note, there is no jets. It have only old props engine (discontinued in the game)
@stig27 I did just some quick tests, and extensive ones will be done only in august, but I think you have the rear gear too backward, and this make the rotation at take off impossible. You must wait the end of the strip, and just find yourself in air after the land end. The wings are a bit flappy, but it give no problems to the plane, so its not a problem.
The pod still work 100%, and the plane flies. Valid entry. Thanks for your time you gift at my little challenge.
@Chancey21 obviously :)
@randomusername I was a tecnician, I assembled it.
@AndrewGarrison OK, now it work. For some reason at the time of my post the button "new post" are not present.
With this one I safely landed on the aircraft carrier at first attempt.
Escape pod engines no longer work, so the pod can't really "escape". It can only bail out, but in many situation it fall back on the plane and explode. Invalid entry.
I suggest to check what is gone wrong, and fix it. :) BTW thanks for your time to built this.
@Nerfenthusiast PC windows 10, videocard 1080, 16 gb ram, 8 core 4 ghz cpu
@Chancey21 Ask me what you do not understand, I will try to explain.
Sorry for my english, it's terrible, I know.
@randomusername Please don't, or the judment work would be hard.
I would like this work ported directly in the game.
The plane flies, and the escape pod still work perfectly. Valid entry. :)
The plane flies, and the escape pod still work perfectly. Valid entry. :)
@AvroPilot You are welcome :)
@AndrewGarrison I'm unable to open new posts on forum (I have a suggestion), it's my fault or a real problem? Sorry for contact you with this metod.
Can you please give me a nice target time?
@TMach5 Absolutelly yes, tag me when you relase it, I can't wait to see the result.
Please, let a little credit for the plane in description. :)
@getorge Yeah! And a modern biplane, born for airshows! :D
@AviownCorp You are right my friend, but a lot of things have taken my mind in those months and maybe years. :( Last one my dad passed away, and I must follow my mom (89 years hold).
It crash my game. Nvidia 1080.
LOL!? :)
Copy.... shame on the thief.
@ApachE420 you only twiched a couple of xml parameters, and give no credit for overall design. You steal. Point.
Aestethically pleasant, with the little exception of the canopy (personal taste). Globally a very good work
@ddweck32 tanks
@Jetpackturtle tho other two are in your links. The one I linked it's the 3rd
@Jetpackturtle https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/N4Uz8H/MEKE-car
Great work anyway! :D
Well done anyway. :)
@Jetpackturtle I seen at least 3 cars really similar
@DJ123 description
@DJ123 the lick will appear here as soon Andrew is ready to start. Usually some minuts
Good luck and ejoy the stream 😀