@Nickasaurus this is EXACTLY the problem... what is my name? You can't know it.. or skua name? I don't know. My name on hangouts is TAP RACK BANG (and i just discovered that google abbined my YT channel to this feature)
@evoevry I did not do tests on your plane, only a dozen of runs. I think it is stability (you need more) on pitch axe and roll axe. More on roll, I think.
@evoevry Best result 0.23, but very low consistency. No missing ring in only one attempt, and in a lot of them from 1 to MANY miss.
Still present the problem of starting "nose up" (in this case, the plane reach near orizzontality, then recover and start to climb. This problem slow the race and with any plane with a faster start cause a midair collision.
No way to find the time to tune a plane to win, this time. So I used an old flying workbench I did to study an interesting canard formula. But... if there was a prize for tecnology or innovation, I will win! :D
@JShay @ValtsuAircraftIndustries Thanks
@BaconEggs Thanks mate
@MediocrePlanes Thanks my friend
Wow, may I use this as sub assembly in my projects?
@Nerdtronics thanks mate
Flying submarine with retractable wings
(It actually flies very well..)
My plane crashed two time in a row, and NEVER crashed before... Murphy hate me. :D
This one will win, I bet! :D
thanks to all partecipants, and thanks to bspboy
@bspboy ty
@bspboy thanks
@AgDynamics my one got 11 dowload. A couple of them are mine, but surely was used for some tests by a dev.
@Ave No, still miss a lot of rings, need much more agiliy
@Ave np, mate
@Ave you forgot to put some roll surfaces, lol... :D
It does not complete Lunar Ark, you need much more pitch agility. Hoping being helpfull.
ON my PC my entry never miss a ring, but I'm not sure on Andrew one will do the same.
but also simply "fabric" or "wooden" can be a great add for some old style planes or maybe steampunk ones...
@Nickasaurus this is EXACTLY the problem... what is my name? You can't know it.. or skua name? I don't know. My name on hangouts is TAP RACK BANG (and i just discovered that google abbined my YT channel to this feature)
Or some sort of "camouflage", like "german ww2", or maybe "modern stealth", and other.
@Nickasaurus :) Still thinking that a internal private message like every forum will be better..
There is no Mods or Devs plane... :(
@Nickasaurus hum... but how i can reach a specific user? Like you, or skua...
@evoevry I did not do tests on your plane, only a dozen of runs. I think it is stability (you need more) on pitch axe and roll axe. More on roll, I think.
@evoevry
Perfect run: 0.23 (but still missing rings in many runs)
Problem at start: Solved.
@Nickasaurus What is hangouts?
@evoevry Best result 0.23, but very low consistency. No missing ring in only one attempt, and in a lot of them from 1 to MANY miss.
Still present the problem of starting "nose up" (in this case, the plane reach near orizzontality, then recover and start to climb. This problem slow the race and with any plane with a faster start cause a midair collision.
@Nickasaurus hem... I totally missed it. What is?
@Waemoth yes great idea... resizing button.
Tis is epic, man. Must be integrated in the official editor
@evoevry I must add:
It fall down for a bit, and if the other plane start faster, your one do a huge acceleration and after few seconds hit the other one.
@evoevry 10 missed rings.
@SimpleTechAndResearch great hit at one mile of distance, greetings!
Wow... I cant belive. :D Thanks
No way to find the time to tune a plane to win, this time. So I used an old flying workbench I did to study an interesting canard formula. But... if there was a prize for tecnology or innovation, I will win! :D
So Andrew said... ;) I want to belive :P
@AviownCorp
@AviownCorp during race it will be not.
@Bando89 you are welcome
Modded wings are a great help. ;)
@bspboy Everithing is fine for me, do what you think is better
@KingDeadshot But upvoting this you was a very very fair player, thanks. :) I hope non steam users will be patched as soon as is possible.
@Skua Perfect explaination. you need a HUGE acceleration, a "normal" agility and a "good" stability. Nothing too complex to achieve.
Lunar arc video
@Frant24 Reported. I never reported a plane before...
So, EXACTLY my plane... no changes, no credits.... is not the way to get noticed as creator.
@Bravon 21 sec is a very, very nice time
Why this thing got an upvote? D:
@bspboy ignore them, they are armed with 6 guns... maybe i will do a specific version
@bspboy No, you graded my spitfire, then I posted you P-51 and F-82
oh, sorry, they are more armed than 2 wings gun, so ignore me. :(
Sorry... F-82 was ready too late for ww2.. I don't know if can be cosidered for the contest.