No no no no I am with you, the first DC-8 I built was mediocre according to my standards, and I thought to myself: "This could be wayyy better," Thank you for noticing though. @SouthTunnel2
@Mustang51 Well they sit and do nothing, with the occasional flight with the sole purpose to unstiff whatever is stiff, but now you say that, I kinda see your point.
@N661US Ah I see, I do apologise for lashing at you. But I do want to see your rendering of the DC-8-70, with how you know these things with the airbrakes, and sections, I bet it'd better than this.
@QingyuZhou I have seen your builds, but I'm satisfied with the method I am applying to my builds for nose paneling, uses much less parts than yours and honestly works enough. Accelerates too fast? Gee I wonder why...
Sandali na lang
Maari bang pagbigyan
Aalis na nga
Maaari bang awakan ang iyong mga kamay
Sana hay maabot ng langit ang iyong mga ngiti
Sana hay masilip
Wag kang mag-alala
'Di koy pipilit sa 'yo
Kahit na lilipad ang isip ko'y torete sa'yo
Ilang gabi pa nga lang
Nang tayo'y pinagtagpo
Na parang may tumulak
Nanlalamig, nanginginig na ako
Akala ko nung una
May bukas ang ganito
Mabuti pang umiwas
Pero salamat na rin at nagtagpo
Torete, torete, torete ako
Torete, torete, torete sa'yo
Wag kang mag-alala
'Di ko ipipilit sa'yo
Kahit na lilipad ang isip ko'y torete sa'yo
Torete, torete, torete ako
Torete, torete, torete ako
Torete, torete, torete ako
Torete, torete, torete sa'yo
Torete, torete, torete sa'yo
[I sure can't understand torete but it is really nice]
@232287168147825 @BuiltBionixInd10
If both of you could find another way to verify an alt account is actually an alt account and not a phony. Please let me know, I don't want to upvote myself either.
I'll see into it, although I have made progress on another airline and would suck if it would never see the light of day... Sorry, but yes, there might be a Lufthansa Livery of my build
@SouthTunnel2
All you need is at least 4 rotator things for this build. and you need to rotate the Lansing gear but that doesn’t increase part count @jelybaca
Great input, although I have made a gear tilt system that is very redundant, and extremely cheap (adds 0 parts, ZERO), basically I have offset the wheels four nudges down and four nudges up, giving an illusion of tilt, well it is tilted. But I'll keep that in mind, thank you.
@klm747klm747
It should be just a little bit more pointy. Thanks a lot for responding though! I made a comment on your A380 just letting you know that you can take those little creases out of the fuselage blocks that have very little rise by rotating them 90 degrees and swapping out the width and length, then using run instead of rise. It works because the fuselage isn't a true circle. But it all fairness, this build is very good and your position on the front page shows it.
It's kind of too late to fix the 747-8 but I am currently working on another civil transport, applied the method you have said, and works well. Thank you for the input.
@Porkchops1233 Not gonna lie I change me mind. It doesnt look good, its too unrealistic, and Philippine Airlines doesnt operate B747. This accelerates too fast, the hump is shaped wrong, the nose doesnt look good, and the isntruments are off. Plus the landing gears dont tilt. Perhaps I should have downloaded "your" plane first before commenting how good it is...
Dont let things in simpleplanes get into you... I have numerous cases of people plagiarising the planes I make but its best to leave it alone, and let the mods handle it. It can get really ugly, and hey free advertisement since the successor system works. Though it can get annoying when they bypass the successor system...
@CaptFoxworth19 no
@klm747klm747 oh, how so?
@SouthTunnel2 I do apologise, but my aim for builds is to use as few parts as possible, and comprimise unnecessary details. While I think a gear tilt would be lovely, it could increase part count to 900-1200, which would suck because well, though my phone could run such detail craft, others wont. So I try to limit builds to 799 parts.
Why ask though? Its commonplace for replica builders to use blueprint if available, or atleast a paper reference beside the phone. Or open in Apple Safari, or Google Chrome.
P.S. Actually, the fuselage, nose, and tail assembly didn't undergo blueprint, they were grafted from a previous project (747-146). Only the Wing assembly and undercarriage were built with blueprint. Decreasing parts drastically, of about 200 parts...
Looks really nice and aesthetically pleasing, and I appreciate your build style. Though might I ask; do the windows illuminate at night? I can't download it now since I am busy building another plane other than the 727-200.
Not to discredit, but dolls are a popular item among men as well, especially the interactive ones where it gets very intimate between the doll and the user. So it is not weird for a person of male gender to build a doll, well as long as said person plans to not do the doll very thoroughly...
@ACEPILOT109 I admire your positivity, though my expectation for this project is at least 25 upvotes because
1)of how poor my Tu-95 and Bell204 performed
2)how limiting iOS screenshots are
3)I was not known then
Maybe perhaps when I update it with windows screenshots
then it could compete with well known user's offerings.
@ACEPILOT109 It didnt get the recognition the first time, its aight, why now? Well thanks anyways, but I doubt it would surpass 30, Wizard whomever already made a profoundly more detailed offering of the Tu-114
@Strikefighter04
Quite flattered, Its all in practice, and the fuselage parts arent actually full on circle cross sections, they're a polygon with huge flat surfaces which I then exploit to make sure it wraps in cleanly.
@NightmareCorporation Its all in practice, and obsessive use of sub assemblies. All my planes share the same Cockpit with some manipulation to fit the flight deck and the proper interior of it.
@AircraftoftheRedStar
Pardon me, but reaching what?
@Dimkal Ah yes, and balloon the part count exponentially so mobile users cant enjoy it.
Look Dimkal, those are great insights, and did those things before; the wing triangulation, funky trees, and realistic performance but one way or another, ruined the project or lagged it severely.
The wing assembly method I use is good enough, its smooth and uses one to four parts per bend section whilst before (Triangle method) uses at least eleven parts per bend section. Check my Boeing 747-146, it consumes too many parts. But I do agree on your second point; I should double check all the moving surfaces before uploading because in fact, the rudder should move but got connected on the decals.
A fix should come soon for that error in a week or so, and I am glad you think I worked hard on it.
Oh, how so @SouthTunnel2 ?
No no no no I am with you, the first DC-8 I built was mediocre according to my standards, and I thought to myself: "This could be wayyy better," Thank you for noticing though. @SouthTunnel2
This is so many parts holy
I swear, all of the planes I am building right now would still sum up less than this in amount of parts.
@klm747klm747 yo, when do you plan on publishing this?
@HYpe1554 your simpleplanes is probably out of date, as the gears I use utilise a new FT function only available on the latest update.
@Mustang51 Well they sit and do nothing, with the occasional flight with the sole purpose to unstiff whatever is stiff, but now you say that, I kinda see your point.
Ride a bike, like a connect the dots to my friend's houses
@N661US Ah I see, I do apologise for lashing at you. But I do want to see your rendering of the DC-8-70, with how you know these things with the airbrakes, and sections, I bet it'd better than this.
@N661US Build one then in accordance to your desired level of detail and accuracy. Not everyone knows the innerworkings of each specific aircraft.
@QingyuZhou I was gonna say There's no load and maybe you set the throttle to 100% but those are plausible. Frick forgot to decrease brake torque.
@ShootsPlanes I'll see into it. I am planning to build it
@QingyuZhou I have seen your builds, but I'm satisfied with the method I am applying to my builds for nose paneling, uses much less parts than yours and honestly works enough. Accelerates too fast? Gee I wonder why...
@TheFantasticTyphoon Oh damn what a coincidence! Have you planned other releases though for tomorrow?
I and UP didnt find any reason to add trees, we'll add them next time@Louis2005
@Vidal99977 three of them are, frankly only one is built from scratch
Oh, no reason, no reason I could think of anyways why there's been a major sacking of users.
@asteroidbook345 nope, just some internet issues
baah who would listen.... God didn't make me a bottom for nothing
Sandali na lang
Maari bang pagbigyan
Aalis na nga
Maaari bang awakan ang iyong mga kamay
Sana hay maabot ng langit ang iyong mga ngiti
Sana hay masilip
Wag kang mag-alala
'Di koy pipilit sa 'yo
Kahit na lilipad ang isip ko'y torete sa'yo
Ilang gabi pa nga lang
Nang tayo'y pinagtagpo
Na parang may tumulak
Nanlalamig, nanginginig na ako
Akala ko nung una
May bukas ang ganito
Mabuti pang umiwas
Pero salamat na rin at nagtagpo
Torete, torete, torete ako
Torete, torete, torete sa'yo
Wag kang mag-alala
'Di ko ipipilit sa'yo
Kahit na lilipad ang isip ko'y torete sa'yo
Torete, torete, torete ako
Torete, torete, torete ako
Torete, torete, torete ako
Torete, torete, torete sa'yo
Torete, torete, torete sa'yo
[I sure can't understand torete but it is really nice]
Yes This is my Alt
@Starmang10 No I haven't yet
@Tully2001 Could have at least given a suggestion to verify an alt acc....
@232287168147825 @BuiltBionixInd10
If both of you could find another way to verify an alt account is actually an alt account and not a phony. Please let me know, I don't want to upvote myself either.
1982 parts|
That’s a lot, like two A380s lot. And yet densed down to the size of a 757. This is some serious project you are rocking.
Make a Lufthansa one old livery
I'll see into it, although I have made progress on another airline and would suck if it would never see the light of day... Sorry, but yes, there might be a Lufthansa Livery of my build
All you need is at least 4 rotator things for this build. and you need to rotate the Lansing gear but that doesn’t increase part count @jelybaca
Great input, although I have made a gear tilt system that is very redundant, and extremely cheap (adds 0 parts, ZERO), basically I have offset the wheels four nudges down and four nudges up, giving an illusion of tilt, well it is tilted. But I'll keep that in mind, thank you.
It should be just a little bit more pointy. Thanks a lot for responding though! I made a comment on your A380 just letting you know that you can take those little creases out of the fuselage blocks that have very little rise by rotating them 90 degrees and swapping out the width and length, then using run instead of rise. It works because the fuselage isn't a true circle. But it all fairness, this build is very good and your position on the front page shows it.
It's kind of too late to fix the 747-8 but I am currently working on another civil transport, applied the method you have said, and works well. Thank you for the input.
@Mike667o
พอดีฉันเครื่องบินพวก ww2 เช่นB-29
เอาล่ะฉันจะลอง
@Porkchops1233 Not gonna lie I change me mind. It doesnt look good, its too unrealistic, and Philippine Airlines doesnt operate B747. This accelerates too fast, the hump is shaped wrong, the nose doesnt look good, and the isntruments are off. Plus the landing gears dont tilt. Perhaps I should have downloaded "your" plane first before commenting how good it is...
Dont let things in simpleplanes get into you... I have numerous cases of people plagiarising the planes I make but its best to leave it alone, and let the mods handle it. It can get really ugly, and hey free advertisement since the successor system works. Though it can get annoying when they bypass the successor system...
@CaptFoxworth19 no
@klm747klm747 oh, how so?
@SouthTunnel2 I do apologise, but my aim for builds is to use as few parts as possible, and comprimise unnecessary details. While I think a gear tilt would be lovely, it could increase part count to 900-1200, which would suck because well, though my phone could run such detail craft, others wont. So I try to limit builds to 799 parts.
@QingyuZhou
Did you use blueprint?
Yes.
Why ask though? Its commonplace for replica builders to use blueprint if available, or atleast a paper reference beside the phone. Or open in Apple Safari, or Google Chrome.
P.S. Actually, the fuselage, nose, and tail assembly didn't undergo blueprint, they were grafted from a previous project (747-146). Only the Wing assembly and undercarriage were built with blueprint. Decreasing parts drastically, of about 200 parts...
@ChisP
Thank you, I am considering building the 707, maybe around July...
@XAircraftManufacturer using bigger parts...
@ACEPILOT109
no, and asertod helped a lot with all the little details. and what you maken?
Oh, like a collab... That is nice. And Great work as well! Kudos to you both.
What am I making? Definitely not a Boeing 727-200.
Though I must say, I should get a move on in my Clientwork Queuueueueu in my Biography
Damn, you beat me to it....
....Now I gotta build something else
Looks really nice and aesthetically pleasing, and I appreciate your build style. Though might I ask; do the windows illuminate at night? I can't download it now since I am busy building another plane other than the 727-200.
Not to discredit, but dolls are a popular item among men as well, especially the interactive ones where it gets very intimate between the doll and the user. So it is not weird for a person of male gender to build a doll, well as long as said person plans to not do the doll very thoroughly...
Will there be an interior cockpit?
@UnlistedPlanes You had me at Thai BL series...
I'll dm you in an unlisted plane...
@UnlistedPlanes wow you really chose this huh?
anyway, what is this grand mod map of yours?
@ACEPILOT109 I admire your positivity, though my expectation for this project is at least 25 upvotes because
1)of how poor my Tu-95 and Bell204 performed
2)how limiting iOS screenshots are
3)I was not known then
Maybe perhaps when I update it with windows screenshots
then it could compete with well known user's offerings.
@ACEPILOT109 It didnt get the recognition the first time, its aight, why now? Well thanks anyways, but I doubt it would surpass 30, Wizard whomever already made a profoundly more detailed offering of the Tu-114
@TheXDimension32 pardon, What is Ofc?
Looks good and all, but Isuzu Elf truck is more aesthetic.
@AircraftoftheRedStar
Aight, Thanks for the info
@Strikefighter04
Quite flattered, Its all in practice, and the fuselage parts arent actually full on circle cross sections, they're a polygon with huge flat surfaces which I then exploit to make sure it wraps in cleanly.
@NightmareCorporation Its all in practice, and obsessive use of sub assemblies. All my planes share the same Cockpit with some manipulation to fit the flight deck and the proper interior of it.
@AircraftoftheRedStar
Pardon me, but reaching what?
@THEAIRCRAFTCRAFTER @Strikefighter04
You guys think so?
@ACEPILOT109
YUMMY
WHEN YOU WAMT I CAN TAKE SOME SCREENYS
Pardon me, do not forget to at least take one shot on ground level level with the ground, so we could feel the chonkiness of the plane.
@asteroidbook345 Challenge accepted
Ooh, this is looking good, will it have an interior cockpit?
@Dimkal Ah yes, and balloon the part count exponentially so mobile users cant enjoy it.
Look Dimkal, those are great insights, and did those things before; the wing triangulation, funky trees, and realistic performance but one way or another, ruined the project or lagged it severely.
The wing assembly method I use is good enough, its smooth and uses one to four parts per bend section whilst before (Triangle method) uses at least eleven parts per bend section. Check my Boeing 747-146, it consumes too many parts. But I do agree on your second point; I should double check all the moving surfaces before uploading because in fact, the rudder should move but got connected on the decals.
A fix should come soon for that error in a week or so, and I am glad you think I worked hard on it.
@ACEPILOT109 so when do you plan to publish this plane?